Badfish's first time at the track :)
Originally Posted by Lances03GT
And yes I know about elevation!!!
I'm just saying there is no way you would run 12's with your Mod's right now!!!
I'm just saying there is no way you would run 12's with your Mod's right now!!!
and yes i am the DA stang god...w/e that is
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by csledd
whoa.. saying a 2.1 60ft is like a 1.8 60ft at sealevel? so you could run a 1.8 60ft without doing a burnout at sealevel? I'd like to see this move
lol.... 2.1 60 at 5800 probably equals more like a 2 sea level... lol....
i dunno about a .3 scond drop in the first 60ft.
Originally Posted by Jack The Ripper
lol.... 2.1 60 at 5800 probably equals more like a 2 sea level... lol....
i dunno about a .3 scond drop in the first 60ft.
i dunno about a .3 scond drop in the first 60ft.

Jon, that correction is off or the data you inputed is faulty. If for no other reason then the fact that you can't cut a 2.1 60 foot and run a 12.7 on a near stock GT.
I am glad that you raced and applaud the fact that you corrected your times, but the results are just not right.
When you spray at this rate you are gonna end up with a corrected run of 9.5 secs. Then, what are you gonna say? lol
Anyway, like Christie said, internet racing is tough. You really need to line-up two cars side by side to really know what is going on. Use the corrected data for comparison only, but don't assume that you can run those times at sea level.
I am glad that you raced and applaud the fact that you corrected your times, but the results are just not right.
When you spray at this rate you are gonna end up with a corrected run of 9.5 secs. Then, what are you gonna say? lol
Anyway, like Christie said, internet racing is tough. You really need to line-up two cars side by side to really know what is going on. Use the corrected data for comparison only, but don't assume that you can run those times at sea level.
Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
Jon, that correction is off or the data you inputed is faulty. If for no other reason then the fact that you can't cut a 2.1 60 foot and run a 12.7 on a near stock GT.
I am glad that you raced and applaud the fact that you corrected your times, but the results are just not right.
When you spray at this rate you are gonna end up with a corrected run of 9.5 secs. Then, what are you gonna say? lol
Anyway, like Christie said, internet racing is tough. You really need to line-up two cars side by side to really know what is going on. Use the corrected data for comparison only, but don't assume that you can run those times at sea level.
I am glad that you raced and applaud the fact that you corrected your times, but the results are just not right.
When you spray at this rate you are gonna end up with a corrected run of 9.5 secs. Then, what are you gonna say? lol
Anyway, like Christie said, internet racing is tough. You really need to line-up two cars side by side to really know what is going on. Use the corrected data for comparison only, but don't assume that you can run those times at sea level.
Originally Posted by Badfish
I really don't care about "internet times"...like I said...just to give myself and others an idea...
Originally Posted by Jack The Ripper
Damn, if i ever go to the track i aint posting **** after reading through this.
Grats Jon on your times. I saw his 14.6 run. I don't know about correcting any track times but out of all the stangs running with us that day that were n/a his was the fastest.
I ran a crappy 12.9 with a 2.0 60'. Traction issues all day for everyone.
Originally Posted by steve-o
That is why I quit posting about my times. The 1st time I did I got told I don't know how to drive.
Grats Jon on your times. I saw his 14.6 run. I don't know about correcting any track times but out of all the stangs running with us that day that were n/a his was the fastest.
I ran a crappy 12.9 with a 2.0 60'. Traction issues all day for everyone.
Grats Jon on your times. I saw his 14.6 run. I don't know about correcting any track times but out of all the stangs running with us that day that were n/a his was the fastest.
I ran a crappy 12.9 with a 2.0 60'. Traction issues all day for everyone.
Originally Posted by Badfish
your saying i wouldnt even run mid 13's...you can't compare my stang based on what other people are doing
and yes i am the DA stang god...w/e that is

and yes i am the DA stang god...w/e that is

You have a factory freak then LMAO
Originally Posted by Badfish
I would run 12's....someone pay for my gas to florida...and I'll prove you guys wrong 

hell yeah i'll pay for gas for you to come. Thursday nights are $15 to race as much as you want, which is about 45 min south of me. If i don't go this thursday, i'll be goin next thursday. That'd be sweet as hell to race you. I'd bring a few cameras to get every angle. That'd be a badass video I could make
[QUOTE=jjtgiants]Oh I know, I was just a little shocked at 12.7 that's all....that's pretty damn fast....you have gears and everything it takes so keep doing it dude



