why would anyboby waist money on a v6
#31
12-17-2006 | 12:56 PM
Thread Starter
|
average joe
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
From: anchoage ak
well with that being said then those 6 sec 4 cyliders have way more potential tha the 6? you are an idiot. what type of engine is the fastest you ask? well smart guy, last time i checked all the top classes ie nascar, winston cup, irl, trophy truck, f1, sprint, dirt track, nhra, ihra, nmra, damn i think all of them run v8's. and for you guys that are into haretage what do you think about the 4cyl muffstains?
#32
12-17-2006 | 01:12 PM
Civic
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,577
From: brewster ny
well with that being said then those 6 sec 4 cyliders have way more potential tha the 6? you are an idiot. what type of engine is the fastest you ask? well smart guy, last time i checked all the top classes ie nascar, winston cup, irl, trophy truck, f1, sprint, dirt track, nhra, ihra, nmra, damn i think all of them run v8's. and for you guys that are into haretage what do you think about the 4cyl muffstains?
#35
12-17-2006 | 01:48 PM
Thread Starter
|
average joe
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
From: anchoage ak
look im not bashing mustangs, i love mustangs. im bashing v6s. and idiots. there are so many nice cars on here. and so many people put their hearts in them. im sorry ifi offended anyone. i was just wondering why?
#37
12-17-2006 | 02:04 PM
8-2=6
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,196
From: Houston,TX
look ive owned a few as well 71' coupe 351 windsor 4spd, 82' hatch 5.0 4spd, 95' gt 5spd and now a 00' gt 5spd. im glad you saw the light and got some v8's. the strait 6 in the mustang did not make it popular, it was the light weight, good handling. if you look for a classic mustang its hard to find a I6 for a reason. everybody and their dog put v8's in them. why you ask? because it was a slug with the I 6. i didnt say dont make them. i said save them for the females and point a to b. dont waist you money modifying them. as for the tard in florida, you need to pay attention when you read. nowhere did i say PRODUCTION anywhere. i said top fuel. oh yeah i dont see any in NASCAR, do you? oh yeah the high school remark. i liked it it was funny.
although it was not that long ago i was there ive since been married. so no need to look for high school nookie. you cant say youve never seen them. there is a few on here. im not talking kids doing this full grown men. but im sorry if your one of those v6 sadists, im sorry i hurt your feelings. i should be a little more thaughtful next time
although it was not that long ago i was there ive since been married. so no need to look for high school nookie. you cant say youve never seen them. there is a few on here. im not talking kids doing this full grown men. but im sorry if your one of those v6 sadists, im sorry i hurt your feelings. i should be a little more thaughtful next time
#39
12-17-2006 | 02:13 PM
Blown 2V
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,297
From: kansas
lets see...xlr8r if u were a real mustang enthuisiest then you shouldnt have a problem with V6 mustangs...and a person who owns a V6 that wants to race a GT might just do it for ***** a giggles...why do you flame on them?
so...F uck off just because we dont have V8 dont mean ****...its still a ****ing mustang...talk to Teal_Beast about V6 horsepower...his is putting out 380hp which last time i checked is more than yours...so please just get off our boards...thanks
so...F uck off just because we dont have V8 dont mean ****...its still a ****ing mustang...talk to Teal_Beast about V6 horsepower...his is putting out 380hp which last time i checked is more than yours...so please just get off our boards...thanks
#40
12-17-2006 | 04:28 PM
Haul ass on regular gas
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,149
From: San Diego, CA and Boca Raton, FL
If you say that a V-6 should never be modified because you should just get a GT, then you could say the same for a GT. Why waist money modding a GT when you could just get a Cobra.
In reality, your opinion is valid....to a point. In any case, from a financial point of view, modding a car is nearly ALWAYS a bad idea no matter which one you own.
Saying that a 6'er is for chicks....well, most Mustangs built come with a six. And, what are you gonna say next near when the 6'ers are making 260 hp right out of the box....faster then your current GT.
In reality, your opinion is valid....to a point. In any case, from a financial point of view, modding a car is nearly ALWAYS a bad idea no matter which one you own.
Saying that a 6'er is for chicks....well, most Mustangs built come with a six. And, what are you gonna say next near when the 6'ers are making 260 hp right out of the box....faster then your current GT.
nuf said thanks for the support man
#41
12-17-2006 | 04:31 PM
Haul ass on regular gas
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,149
From: San Diego, CA and Boca Raton, FL
how can you blame a car? i think that flrida sun is getting to youtard anyways it was more directed at the owner anyways "you". now im not saying that you go around posing to be a real car. now if you are useing it to get back and forth to flip burgers i understand. but uh hey if you info for a v8 just let me know that your ready for a real car.
#42
12-17-2006 | 04:36 PM
Haul ass on regular gas
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,149
From: San Diego, CA and Boca Raton, FL
oh yeah just to show that v6 mustangs are worth it tell me what the second car on this list is?
https://mustangboards.com/timeslips.php
https://mustangboards.com/timeslips.php
#50
12-17-2006 | 07:51 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,085
From: Austin, Texas
seriously j/k with that....
#52
12-17-2006 | 10:18 PM
Thread Starter
|
average joe
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
From: anchoage ak
look im not saying that they dont make horse power, you can make anything fast. a v6 is still a v6 and still gay. wow 380 hp thats alot unless you go to a turbo buick forum. for the money (which is what you all seem to be concerned about) a v8 produces way more power, there is way more technology in the modern v8 than v6's. i understand you guys being defensive. im not trashing your work you put into them. most of your guys' cars look really good. this started about people anyway. im tired of people acting like all the ricers thinking thier cars is fast when its really not. is this a smack talk forum? i am sensing some hostility? im sorry if i look at v6s like everybody on here looks at a civic
#53
12-17-2006 | 10:29 PM
Thread Starter
|
average joe
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
From: anchoage ak
greg my favorite car was my 95 stang, but as technology advances things get better. no im not saying that a v6 is better than a 5.0, but it is a more efficiant engine. yes it produces more hp, but think for a sec on how long ago the fox and sn 95 were. more than ten years. the 302 has been around since the 60s, it was time for something better. the 4.6. so as the v8 evolved so did the v6s. its a good thing. but its still a v6
#54
12-17-2006 | 10:41 PM
Civic
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,577
From: brewster ny
greg my favorite car was my 95 stang, but as technology advances things get better. no im not saying that a v6 is better than a 5.0, but it is a more efficiant engine. yes it produces more hp, but think for a sec on how long ago the fox and sn 95 were. more than ten years. the 302 has been around since the 60s, it was time for something better. the 4.6. so as the v8 evolved so did the v6s. its a good thing. but its still a v6
#55
12-17-2006 | 11:12 PM
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
greg my favorite car was my 95 stang, but as technology advances things get better. no im not saying that a v6 is better than a 5.0, but it is a more efficiant engine. yes it produces more hp, but think for a sec on how long ago the fox and sn 95 were. more than ten years. the 302 has been around since the 60s, it was time for something better. the 4.6. so as the v8 evolved so did the v6s. its a good thing. but its still a v6
the 5.0 was replaced for something better?
In 96 ford dropped the 281SOHC into the GT. They continued to use this engine until 99 when they introduced better power improved heads...
But the 95 OHV302 made more TQ similar HP and weighed less then the SOHC281! This is better?
V6s... as far as my knowledge are OHV up to 04 (not sure on the DEW98/S197s)
and you forget that the V6 is the sole reason that they mustang is on the road...
As far as modding a V6 being gay... ha... tell that to the owner of this car https://mustangboards.com/v6-tech-fo...-timeslip.html
really... get a damn edgubacation yoo fukwin morron!
you should know
It doesnt matter whats under the hood.
It matters whats between your legs.
*****
#56
12-17-2006 | 11:16 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
This is all I need to Say..
https://mustangboards.com/v6-tech-fo...f-my-turd.html
best 1/4 mile-9.83@136mph
best 1/8th mile-6.25@112
Best 60ft-1.41
You're an i-d-i-o-t! 
https://mustangboards.com/v6-tech-fo...f-my-turd.html
best 1/4 mile-9.83@136mph
best 1/8th mile-6.25@112
Best 60ft-1.41
You're an i-d-i-o-t!
#57
12-17-2006 | 11:27 PM
Nitrous Injected 3.8
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,881
From: Bakersfield, CA
.... spend 16 grand on a v6 with 32k miles... or spend 22 grand on a v8 with the same amount of miles, and the same year...hmmm....
6 thousand dollar difference..drop twin turbos in and say goodbye to that GT..
Oh..tell my buddy that 6ers suck.. he ran a GT this weekend and beat it..
As far as a honda being a ricer... this has been discussed but when you roll to the track and get whipped by a honda that doesn't have a huge fart can on it..then call it a ricer... lol...
Oh and I beleive in some of those formula and other race cars..they use a bigger engine then a v8... something like...v10/v12 ...regardless you're comparing a street engine to a engine that shoots 12 foot flames when it takes off..
I wouldn't be suprised if some of those 6ers that pulled up next to you and reved would actually whip you..sometimes its not ignorance..its knowing that they could bend you over like a school girl
6 thousand dollar difference..drop twin turbos in and say goodbye to that GT..
Oh..tell my buddy that 6ers suck.. he ran a GT this weekend and beat it..
As far as a honda being a ricer... this has been discussed but when you roll to the track and get whipped by a honda that doesn't have a huge fart can on it..then call it a ricer... lol...
Oh and I beleive in some of those formula and other race cars..they use a bigger engine then a v8... something like...v10/v12 ...regardless you're comparing a street engine to a engine that shoots 12 foot flames when it takes off..
I wouldn't be suprised if some of those 6ers that pulled up next to you and reved would actually whip you..sometimes its not ignorance..its knowing that they could bend you over like a school girl
#59
12-18-2006 | 12:17 AM
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
those engines are a large bore but a VERY short stroke...
they are designed to run high HP @ high RPMS for short fast acceleration bursts...
they are designed to run high HP @ high RPMS for short fast acceleration bursts...
#60
12-18-2006 | 03:13 AM
Thread Starter
|
average joe
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
From: anchoage ak
yes the mod motoers are better than the old push rod types. they are more efficient in the way they make power. ie. no push rods, alot less valvetrain defelction. and it even evolved to wear the pi heads and intake, a big improvement. then came the 3 valve, that is a killer engine. 5500 can get you a procharger with 575rwhp. lets see what you get when you do that to a 5.0 about 475rwhp. now push rods are not bad of an engine there is so much in the aftermarket for them you can build them however you want. again im not saying you cant make power with a 6 or that they arent that fast, yes there are some out there that are crazy fast. i understand the reason why their made, you have to have production numbers, i know. SnTBakosFinest do you honestly believe that a gt cost 22,000 or even a 6 that costs 16,000. proposterous. clearly you live in candy land or extremly high inflation. if any of you truely believe this you to get your head checked