Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Discuss possibility of a 2 valve making 350+ RWHP N/A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-08-2009 | 12:39 PM
stanger00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Thumbs up Discuss possibility of a 2 valve making 350+ RWHP N/A

Think of a build that consists of big bore not stroked. The block is going to be a machined and sleeved Teksid at 324 C.I. and filling it with 03-04 cobra take outs. The pistons are going to be 11cc dished, supposed to make 11.5:1 compression with PI ported and polished heads. The cam will be custom which will maximize the heads intake and exhaust flow numbers. The intake manifold is going to be one from a Bullitt mustang and Im unsure if it will be ported or not.

Im just not convinced this motor will cut 350 to the wheels without being spun to 6500-6800 RPMs...The max RPM intentions on this motor are not yet clear nor givin. I know I wouldnt run 11.5:1 compression on pump gas at close to 7k rpms.

I have limited exp...but maybe some of you may have seen some 2 valves make 350+ hp N/A.
 
  #2  
Old 11-08-2009 | 01:00 PM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

With the trick flow heads it's a non issue not sure about the ported pi's though
 
  #3  
Old 11-08-2009 | 01:04 PM
stanger00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

I'm sure the Trickflow 40cc version off the shelf will cut 400rwhp no problem.
 
  #4  
Old 11-08-2009 | 01:39 PM
TUFF 4.6's Avatar
"Just Add Foot"
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,250
From: Richmond Va.
Default

I think you're going to see it very soon. I believe the 350 rwhp has already been done.
I know we are talking about these Trick Flow heads as being the greatest thing since sliced bread but its a step in right direction.

There is a lot of smart people out there that will take these heads and make them better and matched with the right cams and intakes (as you said) 400 will be a reality.

R3d said he thinks that 281 ci will not be enough to produce this, I dont know? Stroker kits yea! Its gonna be fun!
 
  #5  
Old 11-08-2009 | 03:41 PM
stanger00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

I want to emphasize more on doing this with PI heads not trickflows new design. I really havent seen any N/A numbers or havent looked for any.

I'm sure a 4.6 based block has made 350 N/A horsepower and im sure one has even hit close if not over 400. For a street car I dont think a high rev'ng motor is going to be as fun as a stroker or 330 build.
 
  #6  
Old 11-08-2009 | 05:14 PM
krenogin's Avatar
A pony.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,782
From: Kentucky
Default

i dont see how 7k rpm can be made safely with a 2v.. i figured youd need 4v to make that RPM but then you would be pushing tons of power over 350 after u got done.
 
  #7  
Old 11-09-2009 | 08:27 AM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

it's been done on PI heads with a race port and some nasty cams. You have to run them up to pretty high rpm no matter what to see that kind of power. 7K rpm is tall but not limited to 4v. You just have to make sure the heads will flow there and your cam is ground for it.

With TFS heads, you can do it on reasonable compression and cam timing but you still have to spin it pretty high to do so. 5.4's do it 1000rpm sooner. A big bore (3.7") would make it much easier to do on PI heads.

If my heads were not the crap they turned out to be my car would have slapped down 330 and a couple degrees of retard on the cam timing would have probably let me spin it to 350rw.

Porting the TFS heads on a 4.6 I think might end you up with a very high strung motor. On a 5.4 you'll end up with a 6K rpm tq monster.
 
  #8  
Old 11-10-2009 | 08:17 PM
Leonide's Avatar
Avatar just for Jack
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,035
From: Whitehall, Ohio
Default

oh it's possible. (link to the guys that produced it: http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...ine/index.html )


you have to use a Carbeurator conversion kit, port the PI heads, add some good cams and long tubes, but it's very possible.
 
  #9  
Old 11-10-2009 | 08:39 PM
Bullitt5339's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 207
Default

It's been done by a guy here locally. He has TFS heads with VT/CMS Stage 2 cams. Made 355rwhp/349rwtq with the stock plastic intake on the car. I believe with cams that are actually matched to the heads, and a better intake, he could make 265-270rwhp at least. This is through an automatic also, so numbers on a 5 spd car would naturally be higher.
 

Last edited by Bullitt5339; 11-10-2009 at 08:43 PM.
  #10  
Old 12-01-2009 | 02:18 PM
Kyanbi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 433
From: Buffalo, N.Y.
Default

Has anyone been using the TFS Track Heat intake manifolds?
 
  #11  
Old 12-01-2009 | 03:05 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

outside a blower application they're not really that popular.
 
  #12  
Old 12-13-2009 | 07:57 PM
helloman1976's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 34
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Default

350+rwhp on a 2V isnt impossible at all but it's going to take a lot of work and adjusting to get there. Generally speaking, people have been making more power than that off 2V's for a long, long time. I would absolutely go with a fuel injection setup and the best heads (trick flow) and biggest cams you can get and an expert tune. Port and polished heads, port matching intake and exhaust, bowl blending and a serious valve job for the heads...head work is essential.

Spinning to 7,000rpms? No problem, you have to have the setup for it. You're gonna need billet I-beam rods, cams designed for 7k+ and springs that will allow you to spin up to 7k.

Lastly, if you really want that kind of power and dont want to spend a bunch of money getting there with an N/A setup...get a turbo/supercharger and call it a day. My 2 cents...
 
  #13  
Old 12-13-2009 | 08:24 PM
stanger00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

I just dont think its worth the trouble to have such a volatile set up for a weekend street warrior. I'd rather keep an octane safe boosted 2 valve.
 
  #14  
Old 12-17-2009 | 06:14 AM
White04GT's Avatar
KenneBell Blown
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,287
From: Kingwood, Tx.
Default

What is your budget?
 
  #15  
Old 12-17-2009 | 09:08 AM
wildride02gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 187
From: Cape Cod
Default

check out latest issue of 5.0&SF. They made almost 350 RWHP using a stock bottom end, TFS heads and cams, 75mm TB and plenum, CAI, longtubes, exhaust, 24lb-hr. inj., and a tune. With a built bottom end, more aggressive cams, and a really good tune, you could probably make 400RWHP out of a 4.6 now. Course, for the same price, you could apply the above to a 5.4 and probably easily make 400RWHP, with insane torque. Just saying.
 
  #16  
Old 12-17-2009 | 11:39 AM
stanger00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

this isnt my plan...

someone is building this thing up and will be using Ported PI heads not TFS 38cc heads.
 
  #17  
Old 05-22-2011 | 02:14 PM
00stroker's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
it's been done on PI heads with a race port and some nasty cams. You have to run them up to pretty high rpm no matter what to see that kind of power. 7K rpm is tall but not limited to 4v. You just have to make sure the heads will flow there and your cam is ground for it.

With TFS heads, you can do it on reasonable compression and cam timing but you still have to spin it pretty high to do so. 5.4's do it 1000rpm sooner. A big bore (3.7") would make it much easier to do on PI heads.

If my heads were not the crap they turned out to be my car would have slapped down 330 and a couple degrees of retard on the cam timing would have probably let me spin it to 350rw.

Porting the TFS heads on a 4.6 I think might end you up with a very high strung motor. On a 5.4 you'll end up with a 6K rpm tq monster.
Hi R3dn3ck. I am really interested in this swap as a potential low-buck venture. My question is, what is the practical rev limit on a factory 5.4? Would a factory 5.4 spin high enough to make use of a hardballr, heads and cams (something like 274/278XEH)? Talking about a 5-spd application, so no torque converter issues.
 
  #18  
Old 05-22-2011 | 02:21 PM
00stroker's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by 00stroker
Hi R3dn3ck. I am really interested in this swap as a potential low-buck venture. My question is, what is the practical rev limit on a factory 5.4? Would a factory 5.4 spin high enough to make use of a hardballr, heads and cams (something like 274/278XEH)? Talking about a 5-spd application, so no torque converter issues.
Phrased another way, would the long stroke / extra volume of the 5.4 allow the motor to make use of heads / cams / intake at practical engine speeds for a stock shortblock (perhaps with room to grow when budget allows for a forged motor)?
 
  #19  
Old 05-23-2011 | 07:28 AM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

I would go with a better cam but the intake was designed to work at normal rev ranges so yeah, it'd be a nice low buck combo. < 6000 rpm.

PI heads are the limitation due to flow. TFS heads can support spinning it a good bit higher. The 5.4 bottom end in factory trim should stay under 6K rpm.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deathdiesel
The Lounge
17
12-21-2010 08:22 AM
King
Modular 4.6L Tech
88
09-25-2009 09:49 AM
Leonide
Modular 4.6L Tech
1
07-05-2009 01:28 PM
jeredan2003
General Tech Forum
1
10-27-2005 07:29 AM
jjtgiants
The Lounge
4
09-08-2005 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 PM.