Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

BBK LT&x-pipe -vs- O/R H-pipe for stock setup, anyone with real world dyno#'s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #1  
MidNiteBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 13
Default BBK LT&x-pipe -vs- O/R H-pipe for stock setup, anyone with real world dyno#'s?

I have both the BBK setup (LT and catted Xpipe) and a MAC off road H pipe for shorties. I can installl the MAC for free now or wait a month or two and do the BBK setup. I'm just curious if anyone has dynoed a LT combo vs just an offroad pipe. Not too concerned with the peak to peak numbers but actual usuable power differences. Long tubes have to be worth at least 20-30tq over the o/r H pipe alone, anyone with actual comparisons and driving experiences?
 
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #2  
PureStang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,796
From: Downingtown/West Chester, PA
Default

unless you have boost...then you wont really benefit from LT's. yes you will get better results with lt's than stock manifolds and shorties in general, but the restults of LT's on an N/A car and installation/the pain in the *** to install doesnt justify the cost at all.
 
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #3  
blownstang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 445
From: Chicago, IL
Default

My car gained 17rwhp and 13rwtq after longtubes, catted x, and custom tune. Was worth .3 in the quarter mile.
 
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 08:35 AM
  #4  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

Originally Posted by PureStang
unless you have boost...then you wont really benefit from LT's. yes you will get better results with lt's than stock manifolds and shorties in general, but the restults of LT's on an N/A car and installation/the pain in the *** to install doesnt justify the cost at all.
hardly the case.

longtubes are known to yeild anywhere from 15-25rwhp/tq. Where pure is probably pointing is that that small return is not much compared to the 800-1000 dollars it will cost to get them installed.
 
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #5  
MidNiteBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 13
Default

I can get them installed for $300.00, plus I purchased them (headers/cat pipe) used for $400.00. I think that's a pretty good deal!
 
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #6  
blue02's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 61
Default

If you wanna get LTs I suggest doing the work yourself. Its not as bad as everyone says. I really didnt know that much about cars when I did mine and I finished in about 3 days. This site has the step by step directions I followed when installing mine. LTS are definitely worth it...performance and sound. http://www.fnsweet.com/garage/ltinstall.shtml
 
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #7  
blownstang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 445
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by MidNiteBlue
I can get them installed for $300.00, plus I purchased them (headers/cat pipe) used for $400.00. I think that's a pretty good deal!
Then it's definitely a deal. Do them! I paid $425 to have mine installed, and that is what most performance shops in my area charge. Then the tune cost me $350.
 
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 04:27 AM
  #8  
MidNiteBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by blownstang
Then it's definitely a deal. Do them! I paid $425 to have mine installed, and that is what most performance shops in my area charge. Then the tune cost me $350.
Sounds like a plan to me! Now I'm just debating on keeping the BBK catted X or looking for a used off-road H pipe (I still have a set pf MIL eliminators lying around).
Either way it will be done in the next couple of months.
Now it's time to search for a 4.10 for sale!
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #9  
Grady Rogers's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 65
From: Benbrook TX
Default

by the time u read this you prolly already made ur decision, i put bbk l.t. with the h/flow cats on my 08 gt, and i did the dyno before and after, before 305hp 298rwt - after instal 330hp - 348rwt.
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #10  
MidNiteBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 13
Default

AWESOME numbers!!! Is that with just the LTs and catted mid? 25rwhp and 50rwtq WOW
I haven't installed mine yet, waiting for some time and cash.
Of course I have a 2V 4.6 so my numbers will be less.
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
mcmmotorsports's Avatar
Resident Mental Patient
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,834
From: Wappingers Falls, NuYawk
Default

Lets not forget better fuel mileage and cooler operating temps too. Any future Mustang of mine WILL have L/T's PERIOD!
 
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #12  
Grady Rogers's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 65
From: Benbrook TX
Default

Originally Posted by MidNiteBlue
AWESOME numbers!!! Is that with just the LTs and catted mid? 25rwhp and 50rwtq WOW
I haven't installed mine yet, waiting for some time and cash.
Of course I have a 2V 4.6 so my numbers will be less.
I wish i could post my dyno sheets on here so you can see. yes, just the bbk lt and high flow cats, also put the k&n filter on it also, but after those 3 items i gained 48rwt 25hp.
 
Attached Thumbnails BBK LT&x-pipe -vs- O/R H-pipe for stock setup, anyone with real world dyno#'s?-gt-001.jpg  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
j_gutta870
Suspension Talk
12
Feb 21, 2010 10:55 PM
StreamlineGT
Modular 4.6L Tech
9
Sep 30, 2007 12:34 PM
powermelissa
Videos
0
Nov 28, 2006 06:01 PM
Rabbit
The Lounge
11
Sep 1, 2006 11:58 AM
Jack The Ripper
SMACK Talk!
14
Jul 16, 2006 07:25 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:21 AM.