The Lounge This is the General Talk forum.

Difference between Mustang V6 and Other Cars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-02-2007 | 10:32 PM
battousai287's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 19
Default Difference between Mustang V6 and Other Cars

i have one question. ive got a V6 mustang with about 200 horses, its a 2000.my friend just got a mitsubishi eclipse (06) and its also a V6, but only like a 2 something liter, but stock is 263 horses. my question is, whats his car got that i dont. is there anything i can do to give a V6 more power?
 
  #2  
Old 03-02-2007 | 11:13 PM
CCM's Avatar
CCM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,395
From: Northern Virginia
Default

There's a few key things about the way that eclipse's V6 operates that gives it more power than your Mustang's V6.

1. Your V6 is a pushrod engine, meaning it has a single camshaft and only 2 valves per cylinder. The mitsubishi V6 is DOHC, which among other things means that it has 4 valves per cylinder. More valves=better airflow, which in turn means more power.

2. The mitsubishi motor has a higher compression ratio than your Mustang's V6.

3. The stroke of the mitsubishi V6 is undoubtedly shorter than your Mustang's, which means it can rev faster and have a higher redline.

Keep in mind that this is all lamens terms, and that the cliff notes is your Mustang is using engine technology dating back to the 50s, while the Eclipse's engine is much more up to date and efficient.

The only way to get real power with your V6 is either going to be a wet nitrous kit or a turbocharger.
 
  #3  
Old 03-02-2007 | 11:28 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Originally Posted by CCM
There's a few key things about the way that eclipse's V6 operates that gives it more power than your Mustang's V6.

1. Your V6 is a pushrod engine, meaning it has a single camshaft and only 2 valves per cylinder. The mitsubishi V6 is DOHC, which among other things means that it has 4 valves per cylinder. More valves=better airflow, which in turn means more power.

2. The mitsubishi motor has a higher compression ratio than your Mustang's V6.

3. The stroke of the mitsubishi V6 is undoubtedly shorter than your Mustang's, which means it can rev faster and have a higher redline.

Keep in mind that this is all lamens terms, and that the cliff notes is your Mustang is using engine technology dating back to the 50s, while the Eclipse's engine is much more up to date and efficient.

The only way to get real power with your V6 is either going to be a wet nitrous kit or a turbocharger.
Agreed

Originally Posted by battousai287
my friend just got a mitsubishi eclipse (06) and its also a V6, but only like a 2 something liter, but stock is 263 horses.
Incorrect, his v6 is the same size as yours (3.8) but has all new technology, like CCM said.
It has DOHC, Variable valve timing (basically vtec), and operates at a higher RPM...
And FWD... yeah, the new eclipse GT v6 is fubar'ed compared to 95-99... would have been a damn nice time to return to AWD
 
  #4  
Old 03-03-2007 | 02:56 PM
battousai287's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 19
Default

so is the engine really the only thing that makes that huge 60 hp jump? i know i could put a v8 in my car but that would cost a fortune changing everything else to fit it and paying the mechanic an arm and both legs, but would if be possible to drop a new V6 engine in it? but not a new 2006 mustang engine either, cause it still isnt much more horsepower. i mean like an engine from a completely different car that wouldnt require change much else in my car?
 
  #5  
Old 03-03-2007 | 03:12 PM
6erPony01's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 34
From: Folsom, CA
Default

That would be like ripping the heart out of a true mustang, and the engine is what makes it what it is kinda. It would be more power, and im not bashing you, but its like in tokyo drift when they put a 350Z engine in the ol' stang, you know? I too feel bad knowing that we have more literage than eclipses and even new V6 chargers, but 60 or less HP....... thats the way it is unless you really shake stuff up with the engine haha
 
  #6  
Old 03-03-2007 | 04:45 PM
GREG@SN95's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
Default

the v6 in the 06 mustang makes more HP then the 302 in the sn95s...

so if you can find a cheap v6 out of an s197... go for it...
 
  #8  
Old 03-03-2007 | 07:08 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

People don't buy V-6 Mustangs because they are fast, so don't get too wrapped-up around the axle on being slower then a few cars out there.

Also, you will notice that while there are a lot of small displacement motors making big power, the torque generally sucks-***. hp can not tell the whole story.

I had an Eclipse Spider when I was working in LA a few weeks ago as a rental. It was 4 cyl and was embarrassing as far as power is concerned. Holy ****, every mini-van on the planet was faster that that peice of crap.

I was shocked at how nice the car looked and how crappy it accelerated. Hope the 6-ers are better.
 
  #9  
Old 03-03-2007 | 07:21 PM
tennstang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 395
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@SN95
the v6 in the 06 mustang makes more HP then the 302 in the sn95s...

so if you can find a cheap v6 out of an s197... go for it...

Greg.. Yer Avatar is killing me!
 
  #10  
Old 03-05-2007 | 06:02 PM
stang88's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by 6erPony01
That would be like ripping the heart out of a true mustang, and the engine is what makes it what it is kinda. It would be more power, and im not bashing you, but its like in tokyo drift when they put a 350Z engine in the ol' stang, you know?

agreed
 
  #11  
Old 03-05-2007 | 06:33 PM
Milos's Avatar
Six-Gunnin'
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,043
From: Bowling Green, KY
Default

Originally Posted by WaterDR
People don't buy V-6 Mustangs because they are fast
I bought it for the history
 
  #12  
Old 03-05-2007 | 07:33 PM
doobie's Avatar
skin and bones
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,055
From: woodridge, il
Default

Originally Posted by WaterDR
People don't buy V-6 Mustangs because they are fast, so don't get too wrapped-up around the axle on being slower then a few cars out there.
i bought it because it's what i could afford
 
  #13  
Old 03-05-2007 | 11:30 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

I bought my first mustang (1995 v6) to learn 5 spd, rwd, fun little car, 3 grand, and it looked so damn sexy when I was done with it lol.
 
  #14  
Old 03-07-2007 | 11:34 PM
GREG@SN95's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
Default

Originally Posted by tennstang
Greg.. Yer Avatar is killing me!
I got banned for it... lol...
 
  #15  
Old 03-08-2007 | 12:02 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

I had a 98 eclipse before i bought the stang. It was just the GS model and it had like 150hp. It was slow, but it was a nice little car with great gas mileage. They need to return to the AWD turbo days. At the last car show I was at they had a prototype of the new eclipse with a race package installed. It had huge breaks, a body kit that was actually useful and looked good, and also had a beefed up EVO engine in it. I would have taken it. To bad it will never be made.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
venom
Tire and Wheel Talk!
25
01-01-2013 09:38 PM
Shambles
Political Talk
9
05-05-2008 08:35 PM
customstang
General Tech Forum
8
04-17-2006 03:52 PM
foncarelli
The Lounge
9
02-16-2006 01:17 PM
burnsmustang
General Tech Forum
17
05-05-2005 02:46 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:48 PM.