Dyno Results Post your actual dyono results here for all to view.

Dyno results for cammed/bolt on 2001 mustang GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 12:32 PM
  #1  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default Dyno results for cammed/bolt on 2001 mustang GT

Just got the car back from the dyno and it produced 252 RWHP and 259 ft/lbs of torque... scanner on printer is broken so i cant upload the dyno sheet (sorry Guys).. my question is dont this seem VERY low to you guys... specs are 2001 mustang GT automatic with TFS stage 1 cam, cold air intake, bored out 75mm upper intake, magnaflow catback exhaust, catted x pipe w/highflow cats and flowmaster 40 mufflers. I was thinking car should be somewhere around 265-270 RWHP.. waht you guys think
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 12:44 PM
  #2  
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,381
From: Sarasota, FL
Default

I don't think that's is too far off. Through an auto that equates to roughly 300hp at the crank. When you say bored out 75mm upper intake do you mean a stock intake?
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 12:50 PM
  #3  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default

no sir i got a professional products 75mm intake.. not bored out sorry my old one was bored.
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 01:13 PM
  #4  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default

just seems weird because stock pushes 260 hp (roughly 215-220) at the wheels and 302 ft/lbs of torque at 4,000 RPMS and mine is only laying 252RWHP and 259 ft/lbs of torque at 5920 RPMS.. its weird im losing 43 ft/lbs of torque running a bigger cam and more rpms
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 01:33 PM
  #5  
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,381
From: Sarasota, FL
Default

What are the specs for the cams?
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 01:43 PM
  #6  
TUFF 4.6's Avatar
"Just Add Foot"
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,250
From: Richmond Va.
Default

Those numbers are pretty close, a set of long tubes would help a little plus you're an auto with about 18% lost thur the driveline.
 

Last edited by TUFF 4.6; Jul 2, 2011 at 09:23 PM.
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 04:23 PM
  #7  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by whitestang04
What are the specs for the cams?
http://www.trickflow.com/partdetail....1&autoview=sku

thats the link for specs on my cam
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 05:14 PM
  #8  
bigkeeko's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 322
From: Scotland
Default

If its any help I`ll be dynoing my 2003 GT auto in the near future so you can see how much you`ll be up.. No cams and just a few wee stuck on bits.
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 05:45 PM
  #9  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by bigkeeko
If its any help I`ll be dynoing my 2003 GT auto in the near future so you can see how much you`ll be up.. No cams and just a few wee stuck on bits.

lol i dont know if it will make me feel better, might make me bang my head on the ******* wall lol i was hoping mine was gonna be pushing more... a guy i know 2002 gt with just flowmaster mufflers laid out 238 RWHP.
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default

so you guys are saying the RWHP is about right but dont you guys think my torque numbers are way off!?
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 06:09 PM
  #11  
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,381
From: Sarasota, FL
Default

Originally Posted by juggalofalife24
so you guys are saying the RWHP is about right but dont you guys think my torque numbers are way off!?
You are sacrificing some torque to pick up horsepower higher in the RPM band. You are still making more torque than HP so it should make for a pretty nice street setup. Save up the coin for a set of Trick Flow twisted wedge heads and a new intake manifold and you will have a prett nasty street motor, even with a stage 1 cam.
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 06:30 PM
  #12  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by whitestang04
You are sacrificing some torque to pick up horsepower higher in the RPM band. You are still making more torque than HP so it should make for a pretty nice street setup. Save up the coin for a set of Trick Flow twisted wedge heads and a new intake manifold and you will have a prett nasty street motor, even with a stage 1 cam.

nah lol its already at 128xxx miles so im done putting money into it.. next is the 2011 5.0.. dont even need to add anything to it, already has 400+hp lol
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 06:47 PM
  #13  
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,381
From: Sarasota, FL
Default

LOL I hear ya. I'm sure it's quite a bit of fun as it is. what all do you have done to it other than the cams and bolt-ons?
 
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 08:07 PM
  #14  
juggalofalife24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by whitestang04
LOL I hear ya. I'm sure it's quite a bit of fun as it is. what all do you have done to it other than the cams and bolt-ons?
it has stage 1 cams, 208 lb valve springs, crank sprockets, cold air intake, 75mm uppter intake, catted x pipe, magnaflow catback, flowmaster 40's,
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cr4sh_0v3rl0ad
Dyno Results
26
May 11, 2011 03:56 PM
stanger00
Dyno Results
18
Jul 1, 2008 08:42 AM
ClemsonStang
General Tech Forum
4
Mar 15, 2007 04:23 PM
csledd
The Lounge
10
Jun 17, 2005 03:58 PM
Blue02GT
Modular 4.6L Tech
6
Apr 19, 2005 06:45 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 AM.