Dyno results for cammed/bolt on 2001 mustang GT
Just got the car back from the dyno and it produced 252 RWHP and 259 ft/lbs of torque... scanner on printer is broken so i cant upload the dyno sheet (sorry Guys).. my question is dont this seem VERY low to you guys... specs are 2001 mustang GT automatic with TFS stage 1 cam, cold air intake, bored out 75mm upper intake, magnaflow catback exhaust, catted x pipe w/highflow cats and flowmaster 40 mufflers. I was thinking car should be somewhere around 265-270 RWHP.. waht you guys think
|
I don't think that's is too far off. Through an auto that equates to roughly 300hp at the crank. When you say bored out 75mm upper intake do you mean a stock intake?
|
no sir i got a professional products 75mm intake.. not bored out sorry my old one was bored.
|
just seems weird because stock pushes 260 hp (roughly 215-220) at the wheels and 302 ft/lbs of torque at 4,000 RPMS and mine is only laying 252RWHP and 259 ft/lbs of torque at 5920 RPMS.. its weird im losing 43 ft/lbs of torque running a bigger cam and more rpms
|
What are the specs for the cams?
|
Those numbers are pretty close, a set of long tubes would help a little plus you're an auto with about 18% lost thur the driveline.
|
Originally Posted by whitestang04
(Post 474750)
What are the specs for the cams?
thats the link for specs on my cam |
If its any help I`ll be dynoing my 2003 GT auto in the near future so you can see how much you`ll be up.. No cams and just a few wee stuck on bits.
|
Originally Posted by bigkeeko
(Post 474756)
If its any help I`ll be dynoing my 2003 GT auto in the near future so you can see how much you`ll be up.. No cams and just a few wee stuck on bits.
lol i dont know if it will make me feel better, might make me bang my head on the fucking wall lol i was hoping mine was gonna be pushing more... a guy i know 2002 gt with just flowmaster mufflers laid out 238 RWHP. |
so you guys are saying the RWHP is about right but dont you guys think my torque numbers are way off!?
|
Originally Posted by juggalofalife24
(Post 474760)
so you guys are saying the RWHP is about right but dont you guys think my torque numbers are way off!?
|
Originally Posted by whitestang04
(Post 474761)
You are sacrificing some torque to pick up horsepower higher in the RPM band. You are still making more torque than HP so it should make for a pretty nice street setup. Save up the coin for a set of Trick Flow twisted wedge heads and a new intake manifold and you will have a prett nasty street motor, even with a stage 1 cam.:D
nah lol its already at 128xxx miles so im done putting money into it.. next is the 2011 5.0.. dont even need to add anything to it, already has 400+hp lol |
LOL I hear ya. I'm sure it's quite a bit of fun as it is. what all do you have done to it other than the cams and bolt-ons?
|
Originally Posted by whitestang04
(Post 474764)
LOL I hear ya. I'm sure it's quite a bit of fun as it is. what all do you have done to it other than the cams and bolt-ons?
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands