http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ4fc...eature=related


enjoy enjoy enjoy.

 

http://www.stangnet.com/category/mustang-videos/

 

Is anyone else woefully disappointed that they resorted to 4v heads without even trying to do something with 2v or even 3v? The heads would have been way lighter and the whole valve train would have been less complicated/expensive.

 

D: Only chirping into second? Still...WANT.

 

It sounds nice

 

I wish ford wouldve tried to do 4v heads pushrod style, or 3v pushrod. I really dont like goin more than 2v on the heads when u get into performance unless i have the money to cover its unreliability. BUT who knows, this engine may be "bullitt"proof

 

why the hell would you want pushrods and 4v? that makes no sense really... the 4v thing works because of the extra space allowed by OHC

 

A 4v pushrod engine would need 32 pushrods..... that would be rediculously complicated if it's even possible

 

what about 351 clevelands? they were 4v. and pushrod with 16 pushrods.

nvm, they was saying 4v in regards to a carburetor.. thats why i thought 4v with pushrod.

okay give me the idiot award.

 

As deserved.

 

 

Idiot of the day is being a little nice.

 

what they're saying is that on the cleveland and really all the old carb'd mustangs 4v meant 4 venturi referring to the number of "barrels" the carb had. In modern OHC parlance 4v means 4 valves-per-cylinder and also means usually 4 total camshafts, 2 on top of each head which = dual over head cams or DOHC.

 

pretty lame video.

 

Why the **** would you want to go back to old school pushrod technology. Look what these little motors can do compared to the big chevy and dodge setups. We make less power in most cases, but power per CI is a different story.

 

I thought the 5.0 was only SOHC.

Or maybe I'm majorly mistaken there.

 

new five ohs dohc, but pushrod seems soo much more reliable. chevrolet gets 400 horses out of pushrods, but there is a large displacement. i love my 3.8 and its pushrods, soo easy to work on.

 

The old 5.0 was a push rod totally different from a OHC engine but I'm assuming you knew that.

the new 5.0 is a DOHC

 

Yea I knew the old was pushrod. But I swore I read somewhere it was SOHC still and for the life of me I can't find anywhere that says whether or not its SOHC or DOHC.

Although I don't see two cams being able to control 32 valves by themselves but who knows...

 

lmao

 

i like the 4v. no complaints. my only complaint is not i cant say my 95 is "the last of the 5.0s"