Mustang Boards

Mustang Boards (/)
-   Videos (https://mustangboards.com/videos/)
-   -   The video you've all been waiting for. 5.0 (https://mustangboards.com/videos/38923-video-youve-all-been-waiting-5-0-a.html)

krenogin 12-28-2009 10:24 PM

The video you've all been waiting for. 5.0
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ4fc...eature=related


enjoy enjoy enjoy.

krazypony 12-29-2009 06:44 AM

http://www.stangnet.com/category/mustang-videos/

r3dn3ck 12-29-2009 07:56 AM

Is anyone else woefully disappointed that they resorted to 4v heads without even trying to do something with 2v or even 3v? The heads would have been way lighter and the whole valve train would have been less complicated/expensive.

Deathdiesel 12-29-2009 09:44 AM

D: Only chirping into second? Still...WANT.

Lazerred6 12-29-2009 10:00 AM

It sounds nice

krenogin 12-29-2009 10:42 AM

I wish ford wouldve tried to do 4v heads pushrod style, or 3v pushrod. I really dont like goin more than 2v on the heads when u get into performance unless i have the money to cover its unreliability. BUT who knows, this engine may be "bullitt"proof

r3dn3ck 12-29-2009 10:45 AM

why the hell would you want pushrods and 4v? that makes no sense really... the 4v thing works because of the extra space allowed by OHC

Lazerred6 12-29-2009 10:59 AM

A 4v pushrod engine would need 32 pushrods..... that would be rediculously complicated if it's even possible

krenogin 12-29-2009 11:36 AM

what about 351 clevelands? they were 4v. and pushrod with 16 pushrods.

nvm, they was saying 4v in regards to a carburetor.. thats why i thought 4v with pushrod.

okay give me the idiot award.

01FR500 12-29-2009 11:51 AM

As deserved.

zigzagg321 12-29-2009 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by krenogin (Post 443675)
what about 351 clevelands? they were 4v. and pushrod with 16 pushrods.

nvm, they was saying 4v in regards to a carburetor.. thats why i thought 4v with pushrod.

okay give me the idiot award.

http://thedeezone.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/id10t.jpg

00blkstanggt 12-29-2009 11:59 AM


Originally Posted by 01FR500 (Post 443679)

Idiot of the day is being a little nice.

r3dn3ck 12-29-2009 12:52 PM

what they're saying is that on the cleveland and really all the old carb'd mustangs 4v meant 4 venturi referring to the number of "barrels" the carb had. In modern OHC parlance 4v means 4 valves-per-cylinder and also means usually 4 total camshafts, 2 on top of each head which = dual over head cams or DOHC.

jseven 12-29-2009 12:58 PM

pretty lame video.

spike_africa 12-29-2009 06:33 PM

Why the fuck would you want to go back to old school pushrod technology. Look what these little motors can do compared to the big chevy and dodge setups. We make less power in most cases, but power per CI is a different story.

08mustang_gt 12-29-2009 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by r3dn3ck (Post 443692)
what they're saying is that on the cleveland and really all the old carb'd mustangs 4v meant 4 venturi referring to the number of "barrels" the carb had. In modern OHC parlance 4v means 4 valves-per-cylinder and also means usually 4 total camshafts, 2 on top of each head which = dual over head cams or DOHC.

I thought the 5.0 was only SOHC.

Or maybe I'm majorly mistaken there.

krenogin 12-29-2009 09:31 PM

new five ohs dohc, but pushrod seems soo much more reliable. chevrolet gets 400 horses out of pushrods, but there is a large displacement. i love my 3.8 and its pushrods, soo easy to work on.

Lazerred6 12-30-2009 02:33 AM


Originally Posted by 08mustang_gt (Post 443755)
I thought the 5.0 was only SOHC.

Or maybe I'm majorly mistaken there.

The old 5.0 was a push rod totally different from a OHC engine but I'm assuming you knew that.

the new 5.0 is a DOHC

08mustang_gt 12-30-2009 11:43 AM


Originally Posted by Lazerred6 (Post 443787)
The old 5.0 was a push rod totally different from a OHC engine but I'm assuming you knew that.

the new 5.0 is a DOHC

Yea I knew the old was pushrod. But I swore I read somewhere it was SOHC still and for the life of me I can't find anywhere that says whether or not its SOHC or DOHC.

Although I don't see two cams being able to control 32 valves by themselves but who knows...

SeanStang 12-30-2009 12:05 PM


Originally Posted by 00blkstanggt (Post 443682)
Idiot of the day is being a little nice.

lmao

mustangman95gt 12-30-2009 12:48 PM

i like the 4v. no complaints. my only complaint is not i cant say my 95 is "the last of the 5.0s"


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands