Power Adders Technical discussions for forced induction with nitrous and blowers.

Whipple 3.4 or Kenne 2.8

Old Mar 5, 2009 | 07:34 AM
  #1  
mpt_1962's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,041
From: Twentynine Palms, CA
Default Whipple 3.4 or Kenne 2.8

is anyone running either of these on a 4v?
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 07:48 AM
  #2  
stanger00's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

what do you want to know?
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #3  
Lazerred6's Avatar
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

Throw either of those on your car and I will bow to you
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 08:04 AM
  #4  
stanger00's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

the whipple will make a lil more power...most people that run the 3.4 make mid 600's on pump gas and 17-18#'s of boost. you will just have to make a couple fuel upgrades to feed the beast.

i would over kill the fuel system with single -6 lines coming off of twin GT pumps connected in a FORE hat. then a Y adapter to a single -8 line to another Y adapter to single -6 lines for each rail. you will also need to upgrade your FPDM's as well to handle the extra current and to avoid running a boost a pump. you will also need 60# injectors and a MAFIA.

Cooling i would upgrade to a larger reservoir and a dual fan heat exchanger to keep the IAT's in check.
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 08:05 AM
  #5  
mpt_1962's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,041
From: Twentynine Palms, CA
Default

i'm leaning more towards the 2.8L. There wont be any clearance issues, right around the same hp output. I want to know how the install is with them. i know they are a direct replacement, but how tough. I plan on doing the work myself and trailer it to a tuner to have the dyno done. Just wondering it anyone has done the work before, what was the base hp and what mods they have done since.
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #6  
Lances03SVT's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,684
From: Carthage, Missouri
Default

I'd go Whipple.It seems like people have alot more problems with a KB.
 
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 07:40 AM
  #7  
mpt_1962's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,041
From: Twentynine Palms, CA
Default

Well i like the idea of keeping the stock hood...i know a cobra isnt much of a sleeper, but i like the stock look with the brute to back it up. I'm most likely going with the 3.4L. Just have to keep doing a little looking around. Anyone have any info about the install...time/difficulty?
 
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #8  
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

I had Delk do the install on my Cobra for the KB. It took about 5 guys less than a whole day and it was on the dyno last night. I never let other people work on my car, but for the SC I was too afraid of messing something up. It only costed me a little under $700, but my sister also dates the oldest Delk brother so not a worthy comparison. I didn't have to get anything else other than what KB sent me in the kit.

I'm not so sure about the Whipple other than I've been spanked a few times by it, but if I changed the pulley on the KB and upgraded the fuel I could run the same. To me the KB just seemed like an easier way to go, and it's what the guys at Delk recommended.

And the whine of the KB sounds wayyyy better than the Whipple. When I took it to the road course all the guys were cussing me because all they could hear was the whine of the KB over their cars lol.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mug11
Pictures
10
Oct 17, 2007 05:26 PM
B-rett
Videos
2
Sep 20, 2006 08:52 PM
ModMotorRacer
Videos
54
May 10, 2005 05:11 PM
White2004
Modular 4.6L Tech
31
Jan 2, 2005 03:09 PM
Ozone89
Modular 4.6L Tech
10
Sep 30, 2004 07:22 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:02 PM.