Officical NFL Thread Bah, bah, bah, Bahhhhhhhh
View Poll Results: Who will win?
Hell yes! The pats won't go undefeated!
6
60.00%
Hell No, the pats are the best team in history, Tom Brady is my hero!
4
40.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Will the steelers hand the pats their 1st loss?

  #1  
Old 12-08-2007, 08:38 AM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,312
Default Will the steelers hand the pats their 1st loss?

I think they can. The ravens and the eagles defense both stepped up when they needed to, but it was their worthless offenses that didn't deliver the finishing punch! The steelers on the other hand have a very good defense and a stout offense! I say Worthlisberger sticks it to the pats and bilichik (spelling)...
 
  #2  
Old 12-08-2007, 08:45 AM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

i think they "can", but they won't. Tom Brady is too good, and he always finds a way to win, no matter the odds.

Pats will be 13-0.
 
  #3  
Old 12-08-2007, 03:21 PM
Lances03SVT's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Carthage, Missouri
Posts: 9,684
Default

Whoever voted for the Pats being the best team in history....




NO WAY!!
 
  #4  
Old 12-08-2007, 06:31 PM
Codiddy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,786
Default

Originally Posted by Lances03SVT
Whoever voted for the Pats being the best team in history....
*cough* mixedbreed *cough* *cough*
 
  #5  
Old 12-08-2007, 10:05 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by Codiddy
*cough* mixedbreed *cough* *cough*
dam skippy!!!! they are the best team in history!
 
  #6  
Old 12-09-2007, 12:40 AM
Lances03SVT's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Carthage, Missouri
Posts: 9,684
Default

Originally Posted by Mixedbreed02GT
dam skippy!!!! they are the best team in history!
Not even close.
 
  #7  
Old 12-09-2007, 09:49 AM
3.8for the win's Avatar
Evolution 9
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,887
Default

Originally Posted by Lances03SVT
Not even close.
+1
 
  #8  
Old 12-09-2007, 11:50 AM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

if they win the Super Bowl this year they will be right along side the steelers.

they will have 4 Super Bowls in 7 years.
 
  #9  
Old 12-09-2007, 04:20 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Pats 34
Squealers 13

still perfect 13-0. and for a supposedly #1 defense, NE sure crushed them pretty good.

Bitchburg sucks. they might as well give their playoff spot to Tennessee or some other team, because they aren't gonna do anything with it.

not very often 6 people are wrong and 1 is right...but in this case..

all 6 of you suck!!! bawahahaha!
 
  #10  
Old 12-09-2007, 11:12 PM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,312
Thumbs down

Well worthlisberger failed me..
 
  #11  
Old 12-09-2007, 11:26 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by 4.6 Love
Well worthlisberger failed me..
did you expect anything less? his Super Bowl year was a fluke, just as Peyton Mannings was.

i love stupid idiots like Anthony Smith run their big fat worthless pie holes the week before a game

Anthony Smith - "I guarantee a win this week against the Patriots".


sure thing pal...you got beat like a red headed step child most of the game, and your prediction fell 22 points short.
 
  #12  
Old 12-10-2007, 10:04 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

Originally Posted by Mixedbreed02GT
did you expect anything less? his Super Bowl year was a fluke, just as Peyton Mannings was.

i love stupid idiots like Anthony Smith run their big fat worthless pie holes the week before a game

Anthony Smith - "I guarantee a win this week against the Patriots".


sure thing pal...you got beat like a red headed step child most of the game, and your prediction fell 22 points short.
You really think the Colts winning/Peyton Manning was a fluke? Peyton Manning is a damn good quarterback and so is the rest of the team. Check his stats, once this season is over he will have had 8 out of 10 seasons with passing for over 4,000 yards. I can't wait until the Colts meet the Pats in the playoffs and hand them their ***.
 
  #13  
Old 12-10-2007, 11:36 AM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by 00blkstanggt
You really think the Colts winning/Peyton Manning was a fluke? Peyton Manning is a damn good quarterback and so is the rest of the team. Check his stats, once this season is over he will have had 8 out of 10 seasons with passing for over 4,000 yards. I can't wait until the Colts meet the Pats in the playoffs and hand them their ***.
hah! right. Billichick owns Manning. also, yes the Colts were a fluke because last year they had the leagues worst rush defense, and gave up 300 yds to Jacksonville, then they got lucky at the right time and manged to play some good defense to win the Super Bowl....F-L-U-K-E....just like when the Ravens won the Super Bowl, ain't been back since.

Pats will own Manning and the Colts again in the Playoffs.

Colts haven't won in NE since before Brady, and the road to the Super Bowl will go through NE in the AFC.

and 7 out of those 10 didn't include a Super Bowl appearance or a Super Bowl win...only 1 out of 10 was SB Appearance and WIn.

Brady has tripled that feat. Manning is good, but Brady is better
 
  #14  
Old 12-10-2007, 12:02 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

It's not a fluke that your defense finally steps up and starts playing better. Either way Colts beat the Pats in the playoffs and then took the Superbowl. Brady may be playing better then Manning this year, but I wouldn't call him better. Brady doesn't read defenses like Manning does and he still wears his little play sheet on his forearm. What he can't memorize all the plays.
 
  #15  
Old 12-10-2007, 12:20 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by 00blkstanggt
It's not a fluke that your defense finally steps up and starts playing better. Either way Colts beat the Pats in the playoffs and then took the Superbowl. Brady may be playing better then Manning this year, but I wouldn't call him better. Brady doesn't read defenses like Manning does and he still wears his little play sheet on his forearm. What he can't memorize all the plays.
are you joking me? Brady has 3 Super Bowl rings!!! Manning has 1. and to boot, Brady has beaten Manning in so many playoff games, it's not even funny! Brady has won 3 out of 4 AFC Championship Games Against Manning!

Brady doesn't read defenses as well? you are on crack!!! He reads them better...Brady doesn't do all that ridiculous audibling like Manning.

Manning got lucky...just like Trent Dilfer did when he was with the Ravens. Manning is a 1 pump chump and done.

Brady's over 4,000 yards again as well! He has 45 TD's with 3 games to play! he's gonna decimate Manning's TD record of 49.

He'll be in the Pro Bowl for the 7th Time since he came into the league.

I've also never heard Brady publicly criticize a teammate or a coach, but what about Manning...hmmm if recall a couple years ago at the Pro Bowl.

Manning: thanks to our idiot kicker. the idiot just can't keep his mouth shut, he's an idiot. (in reference to Mike Vanderjagt after missing field goals that would have beat the Steelers in an AFC Divisional Playoff Game).

Brady = Class

Manning = Louisiana White Trash...just like his little brother, and just like his worthless father. 2 of the 3 are bonafide losers, and Peyton just got lucky last year.

Yeah, and the Pats playbook is like 3 times as big as the colts...its not hard for manning to memorize 50 plays, but it's pretty tough to memorize 300 plays like Brady would have to.

you must be off in la la land. Brady is gonna end up being the best QB to ever play the game, and all he needs is 1 more Super Bowl win. if he gets 2 or 3 more which is very very possible...then there is no doubt whatsoever, that he's the best of all time....it wont even be an argument.

and worse...Peyton left a poor poor little monkey unemployed.

who does that to a poor little monkey who just wants to work?

http://www.bangcartoon.com/2006/parade.htm
 
  #16  
Old 12-10-2007, 01:44 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

This will be only the 2nd year Brady has thrown for over 4,000 yards. Wow 2out of 8 seasons.If Manning does break 4,000 this year, that makes 8 out of 10 years. 6 of those years were in a row.So you know for a fact that the Pats have 300 plays? and that all just magically fits on someones forearm? All they do is pass. Throw to Moss, throw to Welker, then throw back to Moss. It's hard to memorize all that.

Manning got lucky, right. I'm sure every other quarterback got lucky cause they weren't as good as Brady. Montana was very luck as well as Aikman. It was all luck for them. Brady is lucky he has good players surrounding him. It's funny how they pick up Moss and Brady starts throwing all these touchdowns and has all these yards. I bet he would not have the same numbers if that wasn't the case. Just keep on riding on your Patriots bandwagon some more. You probably didn't give a crap about Bradys nuts until this year.

Also, I don't know where you get 7 pro bowls, but he's only been to 4. Where do you get your stats anyways?
 
  #17  
Old 12-10-2007, 02:00 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by 00blkstanggt
This will be only the 2nd year Brady has thrown for over 4,000 yards. Wow 2out of 8 seasons.If Manning does break 4,000 this year, that makes 8 out of 10 years. 6 of those years were in a row.So you know for a fact that the Pats have 300 plays? and that all just magically fits on someones forearm? All they do is pass. Throw to Moss, throw to Welker, then throw back to Moss. It's hard to memorize all that.

Manning got lucky, right. I'm sure every other quarterback got lucky cause they weren't as good as Brady. Montana was very luck as well as Aikman. It was all luck for them. Brady is lucky he has good players surrounding him. It's funny how they pick up Moss and Brady starts throwing all these touchdowns and has all these yards. I bet he would not have the same numbers if that wasn't the case. Just keep on riding on your Patriots bandwagon some more. You probably didn't give a crap about Bradys nuts until this year.

Also, I don't know where you get 7 pro bowls, but he's only been to 4. Where do you get your stats anyways?
i was guessing on the pro bowls...but so what he still has more Super Bowls than Manning...and that's what matters.

this is Brady's 7th year as a starter, and to date he already has 192 TD's, and the season's not over.

this is Manning's 10th season and he just now passed the 300 TD mark.

Brady will shatter that mark as well, and probably before his 10th year.

for the record, i am not on the patriots bandwagon...i just think until someone beats them in the regular season and in the playoffs this year, they're the best team with the best QB in the league. i respect what they've done, because all they do is win, and they have the #1 offense in the league. they are the favorite to win the Super Bowl this year, and until someone stops them, they will continue to be the favorite.

people like you just hate them because they're so good, and you can't stand it.

i think it's awesome for a team like the Patriots to have done what they've done in the era of free agency with win 3 Super Bowls in 4 years, and were in the playoffs all but one year (2002 Season), and went to the AFC Championship game last year and just came up short.

and please stop the well if they hadn't picked up Moss statements...that's a copout. They didn't have Moss last year, or Welker or Stallworth, and they still almost got to the Super Bowl with Gaffney, and Graham, and Watson, and some other no name wideouts. unfortunately the defense wasn't as solid as it needed to be to hold the Colts off the rest of that game...otherwise, Brady would have had SB Ring #4, and been on his way to #5 this year...but that's ok, because honestly, it's just prolonging the inevitable.
 
  #18  
Old 12-10-2007, 02:40 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

I doubt Brady will shatter 300 TDs before season 10. Even if he finishes with 200 after this season, he would still need 33 TDs each season for the next 3 years just to hit 300. Don't think he will all of a sudden start throwing 40+ TDs a season from now on. They will eventually have to start producing somewhat of a run game. And I don't use Moss as a copout for the whole team being good. I was just saying Bradys numbers as well as Moss's suddenly shot up since coming to New England. Moss did nothing while on the Raiders and now he's good again cause he has a quarterback. I will give credit where credit is due and the Patriots are a good team, but you seem to put everyone else down or say everything was just a fluke. I don't care how many times someone or some team beat another team. That doesn't mean crap. You can beat a team 10 times out of 10, but doesn't guarantee you will the 11th time.

Let me ask you this. If and when someone beats the Pats this year, whether it be regular season, playoffs, or Superbowl,are you going to copout and just say oh that was just a fluke, the other team got lucky, or the Pats had a bad game? Or can you actually just say flat out they got their asses handed to them?
 
  #19  
Old 12-10-2007, 03:06 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by 00blkstanggt
I doubt Brady will shatter 300 TDs before season 10. Even if he finishes with 200 after this season, he would still need 33 TDs each season for the next 3 years just to hit 300. Don't think he will all of a sudden start throwing 40+ TDs a season from now on. They will eventually have to start producing somewhat of a run game. And I don't use Moss as a copout for the whole team being good. I was just saying Bradys numbers as well as Moss's suddenly shot up since coming to New England. Moss did nothing while on the Raiders and now he's good again cause he has a quarterback. I will give credit where credit is due and the Patriots are a good team, but you seem to put everyone else down or say everything was just a fluke. I don't care how many times someone or some team beat another team. That doesn't mean crap. You can beat a team 10 times out of 10, but doesn't guarantee you will the 11th time.

Let me ask you this. If and when someone beats the Pats this year, whether it be regular season, playoffs, or Superbowl,are you going to copout and just say oh that was just a fluke, the other team got lucky, or the Pats had a bad game? Or can you actually just say flat out they got their asses handed to them?
depends on the game. if they play the Dolphins, Jets, or Giants, to the wire, and it comes down to a field goal and the Pats miss it...no im not gonna say they got their *** handed to them, because they only lost by a field goal. or if it's a close game in general, and they come up short, or some bs ref call causes them to the lose the game. (like the one that cost the Titans yesterday against the Chargers on 4th down)...that call was bs.

but if one of those teams blows them out and does hand their *** to them then sure i'll be the first to say the other team beat there ***.

hell Baltimore controlled them all week last week, but NE still came out with the victory...and that's what a damn good team does when it counts.

but if you look back over our recent posts..it was about Brady being better than Manning...and you can't deny that. He is better overall.
 
  #20  
Old 12-10-2007, 06:56 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

Originally Posted by Mixedbreed02GT
depends on the game. if they play the Dolphins, Jets, or Giants, to the wire, and it comes down to a field goal and the Pats miss it...no im not gonna say they got their *** handed to them, because they only lost by a field goal. or if it's a close game in general, and they come up short, or some bs ref call causes them to the lose the game. (like the one that cost the Titans yesterday against the Chargers on 4th down)...that call was bs.

but if one of those teams blows them out and does hand their *** to them then sure i'll be the first to say the other team beat there ***.

hell Baltimore controlled them all week last week, but NE still came out with the victory...and that's what a damn good team does when it counts.

but if you look back over our recent posts..it was about Brady being better than Manning...and you can't deny that. He is better overall.
I will say Brady has done better this year, but Manning is still better in my eyes. Sure Brady has more Superbowls, but thats not just because of him. You have to thank the rest of the team for that as well. If you put Brady on a sub-par team, I doubt he would even have 1 superbowl ring. Look at Marino, stayed with the same team for years and never won. Brady is good, but he can't win the game himself.

I have my opinions and you have yours which is fine. I just believe in saying things are flukes just because a team "isn't" suppose to win or they pull together towards the end of the year and take the whole thing.

That is all and I'm done.
 
  #21  
Old 12-11-2007, 11:55 AM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,312
Default

My prediction is brady won't have a year like this again. Randy moss is doing an excellent job but his record with previous teams speaks for itself...with all his drugs problems and such...he was a bad *** while with the vikings and his drug addiction caught up with him....same thing when he was with the raiders...the pats will be no different...
 
  #22  
Old 12-11-2007, 01:41 PM
04DarkShadowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,095
Default

The Patriots are the best team since the start of free agency, but imo they are not as good througout the whole team as the 90 Cowboys, 80s 49ers, 70s Steelers, etc.

The Patriots offense is awesome, but the defense is not even close to as good as the ones on the teams I mentioned above. What the Colts and Patriots have done over the last 7-8 years has been incredibe. They and maybe the Steelers are the only teams that year in and year out win 10+ games and are title contenders.
 
  #23  
Old 12-11-2007, 02:10 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

Originally Posted by 04DarkShadowGT
The Patriots are the best team since the start of free agency, but imo they are not as good througout the whole team as the 90 Cowboys, 80s 49ers, 70s Steelers, etc.

The Patriots offense is awesome, but the defense is not even close to as good as the ones on the teams I mentioned above. What the Colts and Patriots have done over the last 7-8 years has been incredibe. They and maybe the Steelers are the only teams that year in and year out win 10+ games and are title contenders.
Can't leave out the '94 49ers. Being the first team to win 5 superbowls and Steve Young throwing for 6 touchdowns in the game. Man I miss those days.
 
  #24  
Old 12-11-2007, 03:00 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default

Originally Posted by 4.6 Love
My prediction is brady won't have a year like this again. Randy moss is doing an excellent job but his record with previous teams speaks for itself...with all his drugs problems and such...he was a bad *** while with the vikings and his drug addiction caught up with him....same thing when he was with the raiders...the pats will be no different...
i disagree...they were never title contenders in Minnesota (except for the year they drafted him when Vikes went 15-1), or Oakland. the guy was around negative people in a negative environment, and with players he obviously thought were losers.

Now that he's in a positive environment, with positive people, and a coach and QB who are going to push him to be the best he can be...we are now finally seeing the Randy Moss that everyone thought he was when he was drafted. I also think a bit of maturity has come from him going to New England, because he knows this is his big chance to shine, and to win a contender and he's making the most of it.

I think as long as he's on the Pats team, he'll be ok, but if they dump him in a few years, I think he'll revert to the same old Randy Moss.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SnTBakosFinest
The Lounge
13
06-02-2009 08:21 PM
4.6 Love
Officical NFL Thread
5
11-26-2007 05:24 PM
4.6 Love
Officical NFL Thread
13
11-05-2007 05:08 PM
B-rett
General Tech Forum
4
09-05-2007 09:38 AM
suthrnstang
Pictures
22
04-19-2006 05:03 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Will the steelers hand the pats their 1st loss?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 AM.