View Poll Results: Should the 2010 Mustang have had 5.0L emblems?
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll
2010 Mustang with 5.0L Emblem Yes or No
#32
11-24-2008, 12:55 PM
#33
11-24-2008, 12:56 PM
[quote=NewEdge01;366721 Jesus, I mean I could go as far as saying I blame stupid Americans like yourselves for your comments, but I'm not gonna do that because there are probably more Americans in here then Canadians.[/quote]
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahaha ha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
hahahahahahah..... ... ... **** You.
Bitch I think I struck a chord. Can we get an emblem of a shovel on here so you can get the maple leaves out of your vagina.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahaha ha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
hahahahahahah..... ... ... **** You.
Bitch I think I struck a chord. Can we get an emblem of a shovel on here so you can get the maple leaves out of your vagina.
Last edited by Havokk; 11-24-2008 at 01:01 PM.
#34
11-24-2008, 12:59 PM
Look at the title of your thread new egde.
"Should the 2010 Mustang have had 5.0 emblems"
Emblems, not should it have had a 5.0. Goddamn emblems.
"Should the 2010 Mustang have had 5.0 emblems"
Emblems, not should it have had a 5.0. Goddamn emblems.
#35
11-24-2008, 12:59 PM
So I don't know what 5.0L means do I Ghostalker than why would I have started this thread?
I also noticed you saying that 5.0L means something in regards to engine size but GT doesn't?
"I think he has no idea what 5.0 means in regards to engine size, merely thinking it another term for GT."
Maybe your the one that needs to think about what your saying. Last time I checked a GT refers to V8, and a V8 equals 2 more cylinders than a standard Mustang, thus a bigger engine.
Did you read the word "was" in my post by the way, that means this was something that could have happened but didn't and I just wanted to see what people thought.
Honestly I don't know if you are like slow or something but I will post part of what I said here for you again and maybe if you read it really carefully you will understand what I said. I will also emphasize key points for you.
I read on the internet there "was" talk of the 2010 having the 5.0L emblems on the side of them like the third generation stangs and "bringing back the days of the 5.0L engines".
The sentence above is in past tense there for I obviously know this is something that is not around anymore and I am quite aware of the size engines made by the Ford Motor company through the years 1979-1993.
I also noticed you saying that 5.0L means something in regards to engine size but GT doesn't?
"I think he has no idea what 5.0 means in regards to engine size, merely thinking it another term for GT."
Maybe your the one that needs to think about what your saying. Last time I checked a GT refers to V8, and a V8 equals 2 more cylinders than a standard Mustang, thus a bigger engine.
Did you read the word "was" in my post by the way, that means this was something that could have happened but didn't and I just wanted to see what people thought.
Honestly I don't know if you are like slow or something but I will post part of what I said here for you again and maybe if you read it really carefully you will understand what I said. I will also emphasize key points for you.
I read on the internet there "was" talk of the 2010 having the 5.0L emblems on the side of them like the third generation stangs and "bringing back the days of the 5.0L engines".
The sentence above is in past tense there for I obviously know this is something that is not around anymore and I am quite aware of the size engines made by the Ford Motor company through the years 1979-1993.
I am also not sure what you meant. I read it several times and I am still confused. Yes, there were rumors that the 2010 was supposed to have a 5.0, but it doesn't. It has a 4.6. With that being said, why would they put a 5.0 emblem on the side of a 4.6?
Yes, a GT does refer to a V8, but the displacements of a 5.0 and a 4.6 are not the same. A 5.0 is a 302. A 4.6 is a 281. Yes, they are both V8's, but the 5.0 is obviously a little bigger. Once again, GT could mean two different things, depending on the year of the car.
I don't know if you are asking if we think the 2010 should have been a 5.0 with 5.0 emblems, or a 4.6 with 5.0 emblems on the side. If you are asking the first question, my answer is 'yes'. If you are asking the second, I say 'hell no'. If you are asking either one of those, then I don't know what else to say.
With that being said, I am still confused as to exactly what you are asking. I think others are, too. There is no need for you to be defensive and attack people's comprehension levels, especially if you didn't make yourself clear enough in the first place.
Just clarify what you are asking, and you may get some decent and honest answers.
#37
11-24-2008, 01:05 PM
The thread specifies 2010, and emblems.
Should later mustangs have a 5.0? Sure, why not? Will it look cool if they bring back the 5.0 emblem on it? Yes
Should later mustangs have a 5.0? Sure, why not? Will it look cool if they bring back the 5.0 emblem on it? Yes
#40
11-24-2008, 01:09 PM
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Posts: 101
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA I GIVE UP!
All I can say is read the original post again! What you are saying makes no sense I cleary made my statement, if you can't understand it please learn to read!
All I can say is read the original post again! What you are saying makes no sense I cleary made my statement, if you can't understand it please learn to read!
#42
11-24-2008, 01:14 PM
This is actually funny. I have never gone back and forth with a member in all of my years here.
We have all read your convoluted ***-backwards post several times. Your thread title fails the most.
We have all read your convoluted ***-backwards post several times. Your thread title fails the most.
#46
11-24-2008, 01:21 PM
#49
11-24-2008, 01:59 PM
Wait a second, you came on here, you made some dumb post that made no sence talking about how the new 4.6l mustangs should have 5l emblems, you repeatedly talk about EMBLEMS not the engine.
Then, after looking like an idiot, you decide to come back and insult everyone, insult americans, and post up a picture you drew of a *****?
smells like a troll.
any anyone is supposed to take you seriously?
You just earned a 7 day time out eh
thread closed.
What do you think?
1. The 2010 Mustang should have had 5.0L emblem.
2. It should have been an option.
3. Hell no, third generation is dead
1. The 2010 Mustang should have had 5.0L emblem.
2. It should have been an option.
3. Hell no, third generation is dead
smells like a troll.
any anyone is supposed to take you seriously?
You just earned a 7 day time out eh
thread closed.
Last edited by JackThe Ripper; 11-24-2008 at 02:03 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GottiDC
Show, Shine, and Tunes!
4
05-02-2008 05:14 AM
RCTrucker7
Show, Shine, and Tunes!
8
03-20-2008 01:26 PM
