The Lounge This is the General Talk forum.
View Poll Results: Should the 2010 Mustang have had 5.0L emblems?
Yes, it would have been cool
45.45%
It should have been an option at least
18.18%
Hell no, third generation is dead and gone
36.36%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

2010 Mustang with 5.0L Emblem Yes or No

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-22-2008 | 03:21 PM
NewEdge01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 101
From: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Question 2010 Mustang with 5.0L Emblem Yes or No

I read on the internet there was talk of the 2010 having the 5.0L emblems on the side of them like the third generation stangs and bringing back the days of the 5.0L engines.

After watching the 2010 Mustang being revealed on TV I noticed it wasn't followed through with or it wasn't true to begin with but I think it would have looked cool.

What do you think?

1. The 2010 Mustang should have had 5.0L emblem.
2. It should have been an option.
3. Hell no, third generation is dead
 
  #2  
Old 11-22-2008 | 05:16 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

5.0L emblems on a 4.6L?
 
  #3  
Old 11-22-2008 | 05:20 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

This thread makes no sense.
 
  #4  
Old 11-22-2008 | 05:22 PM
zigzagg321's Avatar
Ninja
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,155
From: OH
Default

Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
5.0L emblems on a 4.6L?

what I was thinking too...
 
  #5  
Old 11-22-2008 | 05:32 PM
Steeda97's Avatar
banzai
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,546
From: South Jersey
Default

lol oh man.
 
  #6  
Old 11-22-2008 | 05:35 PM
PistonsFan102's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,183
Default

 
  #7  
Old 11-22-2008 | 07:16 PM
King's Avatar
iDontcare
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,432
From: Colorado
Default

I think he means to ask if the 2010 should have had the option of a 5.0 or a 4.6
 
  #8  
Old 11-22-2008 | 08:26 PM
Flynnster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 507
From: Holt, Michigan
Default

King I am pretty sure he thinks it has a 5.0 in it and wants it to have the emblems saying that. And NewEdge, it has a 4.6
 
  #9  
Old 11-22-2008 | 08:36 PM
reese's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 78
From: indiana
Default

I think the 5.0 emblem looks cool on any mustang, however they arent to that generation yet. It's like they are going back and revamping all the generations so realisticly they shouldnt bring the 5.0 emblems and engines back until 20 years or so from now. lol
 
  #10  
Old 11-22-2008 | 08:37 PM
reese's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 78
From: indiana
Default

Which they are always getting faster so they may never bring a 5.0 back, the revamping of the fox 5.0 may be a fox 8.0 in the futurs.
 
  #11  
Old 11-22-2008 | 09:45 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

I think he has no idea what 5.0 means in regards to engine size, merely thinking it another term for GT.
But yeah, the old 5.0 emblems did look cool, but no, I don't think we need to advertise like everyone else. We've been there, done that.
 
  #12  
Old 11-22-2008 | 09:48 PM
mustangman95gt's Avatar
Mustang Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 522
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Default

awhile back they were talking about putting the 5.0 back in but honestly i bet the reason they didnt is because its hard to make that engine be fuel effcient and low heat compared to the 4.6
 
  #13  
Old 11-22-2008 | 10:48 PM
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

In 2012 they're coming out with a 5.0 GT and a twin-turbo or single-turbo V6. My dad works for Ford and in the last Blue Oval magazine they announced it. The reason being is fuel-efficiency. The turbo V6 will come out around 300 HP, but still get 30+ mpg. Pretty sick idea, that's why I hope none of you guys buy this 2010 mustang right away.
 
  #14  
Old 11-22-2008 | 10:56 PM
reese's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 78
From: indiana
Default

Originally Posted by 08mustang_gt
In 2012 they're coming out with a 5.0 GT and a twin-turbo or single-turbo V6. My dad works for Ford and in the last Blue Oval magazine they announced it. The reason being is fuel-efficiency. The turbo V6 will come out around 300 HP, but still get 30+ mpg. Pretty sick idea, that's why I hope none of you guys buy this 2010 mustang right away.

yea actually my grandpa use to work for ford, and we got that magazine, I see now what he's talking about for 2012
 
  #15  
Old 11-23-2008 | 09:56 AM
Steeda97's Avatar
banzai
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,546
From: South Jersey
Default

Its funny to see the poll results and see who actually voted. I'm not surprised either. lol.
 
  #16  
Old 11-24-2008 | 12:52 PM
NewEdge01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 101
From: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Default

So I don't know what 5.0L means do I Ghostalker than why would I have started this thread?
I also noticed you saying that 5.0L means something in regards to engine size but GT doesn't?

"I think he has no idea what 5.0 means in regards to engine size, merely thinking it another term for GT."

Maybe your the one that needs to think about what your saying. Last time I checked a GT refers to V8, and a V8 equals 2 more cylinders than a standard Mustang, thus a bigger engine.

Did you read the word "was" in my post by the way, that means this was something that could have happened but didn't and I just wanted to see what people thought.

Honestly I don't know if you are like slow or something but I will post part of what I said here for you again and maybe if you read it really carefully you will understand what I said. I will also emphasize key points for you.

I read on the internet there "was" talk of the 2010 having the 5.0L emblems on the side of them like the third generation stangs and "bringing back the days of the 5.0L engines".


The sentence above is in past tense there for I obviously know this is something that is not around anymore and I am quite aware of the size engines made by the Ford Motor company through the years 1979-1993.
 

Last edited by NewEdge01; 11-24-2008 at 01:37 PM.
  #17  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:31 PM
Havokk's Avatar
StangNation
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 510
From: AZ
Default

Well I think putting a 5.0 emblem on a 4.6 liter car is dumb. Your question is dumb and your thread is dumb. Why don't you take you're "was" ... ... make that into an emblem and stick that on your car.
 

Last edited by Havokk; 11-24-2008 at 01:37 PM.
  #18  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:34 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Unhappy

You caught me. I am the forum idiot.
Edit: I would like to point out that his signature read "08V8GT"
It should totally read "08V85.0GT
 

Last edited by Ghostalker; 11-24-2008 at 01:37 PM.
  #19  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:38 PM
NewEdge01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 101
From: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Default

hahaha no my "signature read" hahah dumbass 01V8GT learn to read dumbass. You must be the forum idiot!
 
  #20  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:39 PM
doobie's Avatar
skin and bones
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,055
From: woodridge, il
Default

a bomb full of fail and suck has exploded all over this thread.

5.0L is NOT the same as GT/V8. me thinks you need to check the specs on the 2010. im not gonna put cobra emblems on my v6 for the same reason this 2010 shouldnt have a 5.0L badge when it has a 4.6 under the hood.

If it's a duck, don't call it a bear.
 
  #21  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:41 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Originally Posted by NewEdge01
hahaha no my "signature read" hahah dumbass 01V8GT learn to read dumbass. You must be the forum idiot!
That indeed was my first mistake in this thread. My bad. Your thread fails more now.
 
  #22  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:42 PM
NewEdge01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 101
From: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Default

Wow Havokk you are pretty dumb, obviously a 5.0L would only go on a car with 5.0L engine, get the hell out of my thread!
 
  #23  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:44 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Originally Posted by NewEdge01
Wow Havokk you are pretty dumb, obviously a 5.0L would only go on a car with 5.0L engine, get the hell out of my thread!
Right, but that was the entire argument we have all been making against your thread.
 
  #24  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:46 PM
Flynnster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 507
From: Holt, Michigan
Default

Chill out dude, your question was worded funny, just deal with it.
And I dont think you get teh whole 5.0 thing either
 
  #25  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:46 PM
Havokk's Avatar
StangNation
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 510
From: AZ
Default

I understand why you would want to act like you knew the 2010 Mustang had a 4.6 in it in the first place. But ... it is you who is the official dumbass. ... ... I don't blame you though, I blame Canada.
 
  #26  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:47 PM
NewEdge01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 101
From: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Default

Once again, please carefully read what the forum is about, I know it's hard sometimes to use your brain but try!
 
  #27  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:49 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Your right NewEdge, everyone who read your thread is retarded, and you are the best at making friends. Read how everyone who came in here and posted had a question as to what the hell you were talking about.
 
  #28  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:50 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Originally Posted by Havokk
I don't blame you though, I blame Canada.
I agree, and believe there should be a test you have to take to buy a mustang... damn
 
  #29  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:51 PM
Havokk's Avatar
StangNation
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 510
From: AZ
Default

I'm sensing sarcasm huh?! huh?! anybody got an emblem for that??
 
  #30  
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:51 PM
NewEdge01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 101
From: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Default

Wow! I actually didn't know for sure if it had a 4.6 or 5.0 but when it was revealed and there was nothing said about 5.0 and there was no 5.0 emblem I assumed it didn't have a 5.0L engine, and Flynnster or anyone else I am quite sure I know what an engine is and what a Litre is it doesn't take a scientist to figure out what a 5.0L engine is, Jesus, I mean I could go as far as saying I blame stupid Americans like yourselves for your comments, but I'm not gonna do that because there are probably more Americans in here then Canadians and I am smart enough to know just because there are some stupid *** retard Americans like the retards who can't under stand my simple pole doesn't mean that all Americans are stupid like that rascist Havokk, thats right Havokk you are an Anti-Canuck!
 

Last edited by NewEdge01; 11-24-2008 at 02:03 PM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 AM.