General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms

Short Throw Shifter??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:12 AM
j_gutta870's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 696
From: oklahoma
Default Short Throw Shifter??

Is there any difference in Brands?? Or do you get about the same results with all of them??
 
  #2  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:17 AM
zigzagg321's Avatar
Ninja
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,155
From: OH
Default

theres a ton of info on here that a 2 second search by you could have found.

Ill sum it up for you...

MGW or dont bother.
 
  #3  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:21 AM
j_gutta870's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 696
From: oklahoma
Default

cool
 
  #4  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:25 AM
04Roush2's Avatar
Infidel
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 53
From: Killeen, TX
Default

MGW all the way.....I got a Steeda Tri-Ax and can't really complaint but I'd go with an MGW if I could still use my Roush handle.
 
  #5  
Old 04-26-2009 | 11:23 AM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,974
From: Orlando,Florida
Default

Anything is better then stock and I have yet to see a shifter that isn't better then stock. I have a Tri-Ax from Steeda and I like it. Friend has Pro 5.0 in his car and its nice too.
 
  #6  
Old 04-26-2009 | 09:25 PM
BlueOvalFanatic's Avatar
MB-home of the camaro ads
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 249
From: Central O-HIGH-O
Default

With an S197, the only way to go is Hurst. Unless you don't like a very solid and effortless shift. Nice and tight, very solid feel, and a very short throw.
 
Attached Thumbnails Short Throw Shifter??-032.jpg  
  #7  
Old 04-26-2009 | 09:32 PM
j_gutta870's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 696
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by BlueOvalFanatic
With an S197, the only way to go is Hurst. Unless you don't like a very solid and effortless shift. Nice and tight, very solid feel, and a very short throw.
Nice... I think that is the way I will go....... stick with the orginal i guess
 
  #8  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:01 PM
BlueOvalFanatic's Avatar
MB-home of the camaro ads
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 249
From: Central O-HIGH-O
Default

One thing that is kinda weird is the fact that Ford recommends pushing the clutch all the way in, and with the ball moving only 2" between gears, it makes the clutch pedal travel seem very long. That would of course be the same with any short throw shifter.

As for the shifter though, it just feels "right". Very tight and precise, and with positive stops. You'll never have any doubt what gear it's going into. Heres a pic from a little further away for a little perspective.
 
Attached Thumbnails Short Throw Shifter??-hpim0796.jpg  

Last edited by BlueOvalFanatic; 04-26-2009 at 10:06 PM. Reason: added pic
  #9  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:12 PM
j_gutta870's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 696
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by BlueOvalFanatic
One thing that is kinda weird is the fact that Ford recommends pushing the clutch all the way in, and with the ball moving only 2" between gears, it makes the clutch pedal travel seem very long. That would of course be the same with any short throw shifter.

As for the shifter though, it just feels "right". Very tight and precise, and with positive stops. You'll never have any doubt what gear it's going into. Heres a pic from a little further away for a little perspective.

Yea I noticed a whole lot while I was driving today how far apart the shifts are and how far that you have to press the clutch in cuz some ricer was jackin with me... Also BlueOval I noticed you have the light covers.. how hard is it to see at night with them?
 
  #10  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:34 PM
PureStang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,796
From: Downingtown/West Chester, PA
Default

hurst or MGW.

/thread
 
  #11  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:39 PM
BlueOvalFanatic's Avatar
MB-home of the camaro ads
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 249
From: Central O-HIGH-O
Default

Not hard. My eyes suck, but the tint is pretty light. It looks darker in my sig pic, as you are not looking straight on, into the reflective part.

*edit* LOL, OK, you might be looking at the avatar pic, which is straight on. It's still not very dark.
 
  #12  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:40 PM
j_gutta870's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 696
From: oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by BlueOvalFanatic
Not hard. My eyes suck, but the tint is pretty light. It looks darker in my sig pic, as you are not looking straight on, into the reflective part.
Do you have light covers or the vinyl tint?
 
  #13  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:54 PM
BlueOvalFanatic's Avatar
MB-home of the camaro ads
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 249
From: Central O-HIGH-O
Default

It's static cling window tint. I was afraid the plexiglass type would scratch something.
 
  #14  
Old 04-26-2009 | 10:58 PM
j_gutta870's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 696
From: oklahoma
Default

Cool... It looks nice I'm debating whether to do mine or not...
 
  #15  
Old 04-27-2009 | 06:21 AM
mustangV6_04's Avatar
1/4 Mile 13.3@105MPH
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: Palm Coast, Florida
Default

MGW FTW!
 
  #16  
Old 04-27-2009 | 08:29 AM
bassman97's Avatar
blank
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,451
From: North Jersey
Default

They're all the same. Just MGW offers slightly more adjustable while the others require to buy different shaped stick. However, considering the application, the only one is the Hurst w/ the chrome stick and white ball. No point in getting a better shifter if it's covered by the stock boot for that clean "ricer" look.
 
  #17  
Old 04-27-2009 | 07:25 PM
Pyrosis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
From: NEPA
Default

you guys have the link to the mgw shifter? its actually my next mod along with the tranny fluid change. sounds like i may be a little low on it
 
  #18  
Old 04-27-2009 | 09:22 PM
FoxRodder's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 63
From: Orlando yuk
Default

I remember driving some of the roush cars when I worked at the dealer. I think the shifters were super stiff and I didnt like them at all. The stockers felt pretty nice maybe a bit mushy. Seems like they shift so much more smoothly than the 04 back cars.
 
  #19  
Old 04-27-2009 | 11:17 PM
mustangvsix's Avatar
4 point 6
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,347
From: Flagstaff, Az / Los Alamos, NM
Default

I just placed my order today for an MGW. I have no doubt I will be impressed with it, as I have never read negative comments about the MGW but have found at least one or two things said to be negative about other shifters (usually just personal preference though).

here is the link to buy one:
http://www.mgwltd.com/mustang_1990-2004.shtml
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarkSith
General Tech Forum
22
07-09-2005 12:46 PM
Badfish
The Lounge
42
06-19-2005 02:08 PM
73coupe99v6
AmericanMuscle
7
03-29-2005 07:33 AM
jjtgiants
The Lounge
7
02-24-2005 05:52 PM
Vert_Lover
Modular 4.6L Tech
6
11-29-2004 01:10 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:39 PM.