Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.
View Poll Results: What are your 5.4L swap plans?
Not swapping. You guys are nuts for trying.
1.82%
Not swapping but find the topic interesting.
12.73%
Thinking about doing the swap but not in the next year.
16.82%
Definitely going to do the swap in the next year or so.
25.45%
Doing it now. Looking for an engine or awaiting delivery.
15.45%
Doing it now. Already bought an engine.
18.64%
Done. Got my 5.4L and showin my tail lights to camaro's every day.
7.73%
Screw 5.4, I'm going diesel 4cylinder.
1.36%
Voters: 220. You may not vote on this poll

Anyone intrested in 5.4L swaps, in here. Need you to opine.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #2401  
Old 08-09-2007, 08:21 AM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

Originally Posted by stang671
Hey,
I'm looking at buying the T-trim. But is there a real difference between the CW/CCW and straight or curve...does it really matter or is it just personal choice...and they have a kit for the S-trim but how do you sub..the T-trim do you have to call them to do that...thanks for taking the time to read this...
CW/CCW will determine the orientation and mounting position of the head unit. You need CCW for a 96-04 so it'll mount near the MAF sensor wire. Straight vs. curved is only important for where you mount it and whether or not you use an intercooler and where that goes. Straight tubes are normally just plumbed into a pipe to the TB. curved help change the direction toward the inter/after-cooler in less space. T trim is going to be a semi-custom package. I'd get a tuner kit and supply your own fuel system upgrades and tuning.

Blitz, what are you getting for those pipes again? Can you trim them out to mid-length instead of full length? Thinking about 8-12" on the rearmost tubes.
 
  #2402  
Old 08-09-2007, 08:24 AM
Blitzmann's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
CW/CCW will determine the orientation and mounting position of the head unit. You need CCW for a 96-04 so it'll mount near the MAF sensor wire. Straight vs. curved is only important for where you mount it and whether or not you use an intercooler and where that goes. Straight tubes are normally just plumbed into a pipe to the TB. curved help change the direction toward the inter/after-cooler in less space. T trim is going to be a semi-custom package. I'd get a tuner kit and supply your own fuel system upgrades and tuning.

Blitz, what are you getting for those pipes again? Can you trim them out to mid-length instead of full length? Thinking about 8-12" on the rearmost tubes.
I'm sure with a few hours of research we could have a mid-length setup fabbed up, and then after that it'd only take a fraction of that time to make extra sets. Let me see if we can do something with it this weekend.
 
  #2403  
Old 08-09-2007, 11:41 AM
assasinator's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 122
Default

yes it does require modification. the passenger side 5.4 3v manifold works fine, but the drivers' side won't even be close.

there are a few options, and they all require purchasing a driver's side 05+ mustang manifold.

1. buy a tubular k-member and offset it 1" to the passenger side. hammer the firewall to clear the flange so a pipe will install.

2.set the motor in a little cocked, and hammer the firewall for the flange to clear.

3. do what i did. cut the 5.4 manifold flange off about 4-5" from the end of the collector seal. cut a 4.6 3v manifold in the same place. tack the 5.4 3v collector to the 4.6 3v and check fitment. it needs to angle back a little and angle towards the engine a little. cast iron stick weld it while keeping the manifold >300 degrees. i used my propane grill on HIGH. do about 1" and peen it before it solidifies. do 1 root and 2 additional passes. after each 1" weld peen and place back in the oven to reheat.

when finished with all 3 passes, place in oven and SLOWLY bring heat down. final step is to keep in oven until totally cool.

you will find that if you match the pieces correctly there is an excellent inside match and no restrictions. and no leaks from header gasket.

no pounding no nothing.

BTW i used DCEP reverse polarity on the welder. i added a 150 amp diode to the welder to make it AC/DC.
 
  #2404  
Old 08-09-2007, 06:02 PM
VOID's Avatar
Totaly pimpalicious 5.42v
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 258
Default

hmmm that sounds like there is some car mutalation in there. i think i'm going to stear clear
 
  #2405  
Old 08-14-2007, 09:03 AM
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bham, ala
Posts: 1,233
Default

has anyone else got any pics of their projects? i've only seen a couple pics along the way.
 
  #2406  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:43 AM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

pics of my motor hopefully today. truck dropping it off at my installers right now.
 
  #2407  
Old 08-14-2007, 11:20 AM
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bham, ala
Posts: 1,233
Default

are u getting that intake off corral? if not i'm gonna jump on it.
 
  #2408  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:19 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

me no... I'm using my hardball'r at least for the time being.
 
  #2409  
Old 08-24-2007, 08:21 AM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

shiiiit almost lost a 2410 post thread... that would have sucked.

Teaser:

Name:  Photo_033007_001.jpg
Views: 138
Size:  42.8 KB
 

Last edited by r3dn3ck; 08-24-2007 at 08:30 AM.
  #2410  
Old 08-24-2007, 10:49 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

Get that bad boy put in.
 
  #2411  
Old 08-24-2007, 12:15 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

the problem right now is finding somewhere semi-local that can do it at a decent price. People wanting 100 bucks an hour and quoting off like 40 hours. I'm not paying 4k for a motor install. I'm going to talk to my neighbor again and see what he can do.
 
  #2412  
Old 08-24-2007, 12:23 PM
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bham, ala
Posts: 1,233
Default

i thought all that was good in this world had left me........

almost gave up the 5.4 with nobody to talk to here.....
 
  #2413  
Old 08-24-2007, 12:34 PM
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bham, ala
Posts: 1,233
Default

r3d, bring it over to my house, i'll have it in around an hour or so......
 
  #2414  
Old 08-24-2007, 01:31 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

kinda a long drive I think... or I totally would
 
  #2415  
Old 08-24-2007, 03:21 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

Damn 40 hours just to drop a motor in. Thats crazy. I've noticed a lot of places local to us probably don't know what they are doing so they quote such high damn prices.
 
  #2416  
Old 08-24-2007, 07:09 PM
tooslow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 182
Default

you guys want pics from a project, well here are some.

i KNOW this will get you guys hearts pumping. it isn't a 5.4l swap, but is a big mod motor going in one hell of a ride.



















hahaa, sorry for the teaser pause. I"m posting this on behalf a friend, so i'll be as true to the info as i can. this is the car, well, what it used to be. sorry for the bad pic quality and size.



i say what it once was, because it has very little left of what you see. the car has been modified to the extent that it is no longer the stang you see, but a custom built car, with that cars shell wrapped around it. it is now a body on frame car, that will be one hell of a retro/modern street ripper.

here are a couple more pics.

the early stages or deconstruction



the outer shell, no longer a unibody, braced awaiting the custom frame.



speaks for it self



trial fitting of frame



the new frame, and major part of the build



starting to become one again



frame in shell



trial fitting of the tires for soon to come suspension and ride hight set-up



more trial fitting



yet more trial fitting



upskirt shot



close to how the car will sit.





and here it is fellas. the sole reason this car relates to this thread.



wait for it


wait for it

still wiating

ok, here it is.



the engine will eventually become a twin turbo 6.8l v10. <--- that is the only actual engine specing that has been done to date.

he sias he'll cross the road of setting up the engine once the chassis and suspension is set-up. once it becomes a roller, its engine time.

heres where it gets good. like i said, i am posting on his behalf. he is very tied up with work, and gave me the get go to talk and ask questions for him. Here is everyone chane to give input into what this engine will eventually become. the heads, rotating assymbly, and essentually everything about it is up for grabs at this point as far as the final product. it WILL be a twin turbo v10, that is all that is set in stone.

Any advise? suggestions? contacts to the people who need to be takled too. i've told him to contact as many turbo builders as possible, even talk with shops like MMR and VT. the engine is still a bit away as far as getting started working on, but gathering as much info as possible is key. everything is open at this point. 2v, 3v, almost anything. The only thing that we've discussed at length was the intake situation. He, and i agree to an extent, thinks that a dual "log" type intake much like the gen i and gen II vipers (not exactly, and the final design i'm 99.9% sure will be designed by a seasoned pro.) use along with dual throttle bodies. I believe that it is more than possible with 2v heads, but not so sure about on 3v. The info brought up in this thread about 3v heads have tornished my hope that 3v heads will be used.

Again, all that is had of the engine is the block. if you haven't figured out, it doesn't exactly 'have' to be a TT 6.8l v10, but it will. for that reason alone. and it will be made to work. some way, some how. This car is more than the typical mustang build, nothing about it is supposed to be the normal.

SPEAK UP

you are a great bunch of guys, i've enjoyed reading this thread and talking with you all. i hope you like, no LOVE, this car.

any and all feed back is welcome. he and I thank you in advance.
 
  #2417  
Old 08-24-2007, 07:10 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

speed freaks in tracy quoted the labor at 2K to start.
 
  #2418  
Old 08-24-2007, 07:21 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

for the v10... if you can find 3v heads, then I'd definitely go that route. Bore the block over .020 and have the heads worked with the new bore diameter in mind. The twin log intake is a proven turbo design. Banks uses it to great effect on their Big Hoss duramax intakes. Make sure there's enough volume and get the cams custom ground for the turbo application . At 6500 rpm that thing will sing. If you're going big boost then get some of the ultimate HG's (super soft copper with SS wire sealing rings). Make sure it's balanced and well blueprinted.
 
  #2419  
Old 08-24-2007, 07:27 PM
tooslow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 182
Default

thanks, so i take it you like?

i don't know who he entends to have build his intake, but you think Hogan would be able to knock out a 3v intake for this thing? i know, just ask him. but the strange layout of the 3v heads won't make it very heard and super costly to do so?
 
  #2420  
Old 08-24-2007, 08:12 PM
tooslow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 182
Default

Redneck, engine is looking awsome. Get that **** in already. its going to be a beast
 
  #2421  
Old 08-25-2007, 08:07 AM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

Hogan should be able to do really great things for the intake. A good size balance tube between the logs (I'd use 1 fore, 1 midships and 1 aft for a total of 3) will help keep surging from becoming a problem with forced induction through such a long common plenum.

Making the intake itself will be simple. You just make a base plate on the heads to mount everything then start TIGing on runners and coolant crossovers. With the pretty smooth shape of the 3v intake ports making nice flowing runners should be cake.
 
  #2422  
Old 08-25-2007, 01:15 PM
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bham, ala
Posts: 1,233
Default

simple awesome...... i thought about a v10 when my 5.4 puked. but i didn't have the funds for the custom work need to put it in my gt...
 
  #2423  
Old 08-25-2007, 05:41 PM
Cheddar's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 19
Default

i have a 96GT would the swap be as easy for the SN95's?
 
  #2424  
Old 08-25-2007, 06:03 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

a v10 swap? no... that's difficult no matter how you slice it. It's a lot of custom work. Figure 20K in the power train.

a 5.4 to a 96.. it's just as easy but hood clearance on pre-99 models will be an issue. you'll need a small cowl.

Putting a modular motor in a 94-95 is an extensive process. Wiring harnesses change, k-member changes, front suspension, etc... PITA.
 
  #2425  
Old 08-26-2007, 01:11 PM
tooslow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 182
Default

MM&FF just p*ssed me off.

in the "under pressure" colomn, they talk about intake situations for the many different powertrain layouts people are running in their engines.

the thing that kind of has me ticked, is that they say how a major part of the test will be on the 5.4l engine swap guys. They state, that even though it is a very small minority of enthusiats doing the swap they are still dedicated to bringing information and posibilites to even the fewest of mustang owners.

sounds great right? just what we are looking far, wide spread coverage. nope, the 5.4l part of the testing will be 100% DOHC 4v engines. Because you know, even though we 2v guys are only a small minority, they still strive to bring us information on the posibilities that are out there to help solve our intake problems. B.S.

oh, and they even care enough to have a custom sheet metal DOHC 5.4l intake to test along side intakes such as the sullivan, boss 290, and the stock navi intake.

i'm glad they are at least doing the testing, but come on. the irony in their claim is saddening.
 
  #2426  
Old 08-26-2007, 01:12 PM
tooslow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 182
Default

on a more possitive note, do you happen to know the strength of the 6.8l v10 crank Red?

i've heard it is not a very strong piece.
 
  #2427  
Old 08-26-2007, 01:19 PM
tooslow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 182
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
a v10 swap? no... that's difficult no matter how you slice it. It's a lot of custom work.
really? there is going to be a lot of custom work to get the v10 to work? kind of hoping this project wouldn't need any fabrication.
 
  #2428  
Old 08-26-2007, 04:17 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 9,865
Default

I can't speak to the strength of the v10 crank. If it's anything like any of the other modular motors then it'll hold gobs of power in stock form. An aftermarket forged crank is surely a good idea for a performance application.

There's no simple custom motor. It's to your benefit that Ford was nice and made parts interchangeable but the intake and exhaust are all totally custom. That's a lot of work. Most of the rest will be simple enough with off the shelf performance parts.
 
  #2429  
Old 08-26-2007, 06:25 PM
blown06's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4
Default

It's an interesting idea but for my limited budget I'm stuck increasing displacement through forced induction.
 
  #2430  
Old 08-26-2007, 06:49 PM
tooslow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 182
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
I can't speak to the strength of the v10 crank. If it's anything like any of the other modular motors then it'll hold gobs of power in stock form. An aftermarket forged crank is surely a good idea for a performance application.

There's no simple custom motor. It's to your benefit that Ford was nice and made parts interchangeable but the intake and exhaust are all totally custom. That's a lot of work. Most of the rest will be simple enough with off the shelf performance parts.
sorry, sarcasim is really hard to get across on the internet. i was joking by saying we were hoping to not do any fabrication. i just guessed by looking ath the pictures you would pick up on the joke. the project has been nothing but custom fabrication. the engine will be no different.
 


Quick Reply: Anyone intrested in 5.4L swaps, in here. Need you to opine.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:08 AM.