Mustang Forums

Go Back   Mustang Forums > Mustang Madness > Modular 4.6L Tech

Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2007, 11:49 AM   #1 (permalink)
NeedACobra
Senior Member
 
NeedACobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Navarre, Florida.
Posts: 118
Default 4.6 or 5.0?

I was looking at a GT on yahoo the other day and I saw a picture of the cars engine, and I know that 94-04 GT's have 4.6l engines in them, but it said "5.0l H.O." on the engine. Is that normal or did I stumble across a car that had an engine swap?
NeedACobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007, 01:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
jeredan2003
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 1,788
Default

All 94 and 95 GTs have 5.0 engines in them from the factory.....The Cobras also have a 5.0 just with GT-40 heads and a better flowing cobra intake.....

They didnt start using the 4.6 until 1996.....
__________________
2003 DSG GT 5-speed
Hellion 62mm and Flowmaster catback.....

My bonestock 2v engine had been through 2 years of NX 100 shot, 3 years running 8-12lbs vortech s-trim, got into boost daily while racing on the weekends, had 157,000 miles on it, and was running like new
jeredan2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007, 01:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
stage2roush2002
Roush #6147
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeredan2003 View Post
All 94 and 95 GTs have 5.0 engines in them from the factory.....The Cobras also have a 5.0 just with GT-40 heads and a better flowing cobra intake.....

They didnt start using the 4.6 until 1996.....
Yeah this is right. It is probablly a 94-95 that you saw.
stage2roush2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007, 02:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
NeedACobra
Senior Member
 
NeedACobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Navarre, Florida.
Posts: 118
Default

No shit?

But didnt those years put out less horse power and torque than the 96-98 GT's?
NeedACobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 12:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
jeredan2003
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 1,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedACobra View Post
No shit?

But didnt those years put out less horse power and torque than the 96-98 GT's?
my dad has a 95 cobra. Its bone stock and used to whoop up on my old 97 GT....
__________________
2003 DSG GT 5-speed
Hellion 62mm and Flowmaster catback.....

My bonestock 2v engine had been through 2 years of NX 100 shot, 3 years running 8-12lbs vortech s-trim, got into boost daily while racing on the weekends, had 157,000 miles on it, and was running like new
jeredan2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 11:08 AM   #6 (permalink)
r3dn3ck
Wowbagger hates me too!
 
r3dn3ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 7,022
Default

the 5.0 made less power out of the box but any level of mods to the 5.0 will be waaaaay more worth it than on the 4.6 if you like to race dyno numbers. The 4.6 and 5.4's have a LOT stronger block and you can spin them to huge rpms thanks to the lighter valvetrain and reduced number of moving parts. Basically it comes down to what you want it for. I prefer the newer OHC modular motors even if they are handicapped by a 3.5" bore.
r3dn3ck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Ad Management by RedTyger

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48