V6 Tech Forums For all your 3.8L and 4.0L needs!

Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
blk00stang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 103
From: springfield, mo
Default Exhaust

Headers or exhaust first?
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 06:40 PM
  #2  
V6_Mustang_Power's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,808
Default

i like the sound of MAC Longtube headers, O/R H-Pipe, and Flowmaster 2-chamber catback myself.

their would be no point in getting headers then have to wait to get a Catback. plus you can keep the stock headers on until you get more power.
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #3  
mustangvsix's Avatar
4 point 6
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,347
From: Flagstaff, Az / Los Alamos, NM
Default

yep, no need to replace the headers except for sound. Pick out a good sounding cat back.
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 07:08 PM
  #4  
Must See's Avatar
8-2=6
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,196
From: Houston,TX
Default

what would be some good headers for me?

I already have true duals with a custom H-pipe with spin techs. I wouldnt mind making my 6er louder. But im afraid itll sound to ricey. any thoughts?
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #5  
Dave04Mustang's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,950
From: San Marcos, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Must See
what would be some good headers for me?

I already have true duals with a custom H-pipe with spin techs. I wouldnt mind making my 6er louder. But im afraid itll sound to ricey. any thoughts?
mac long tubes are good
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #6  
V6_Mustang_Power's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,808
Default

MAC's FTW!
 
Old May 27, 2008 | 08:13 PM
  #7  
bwesky's Avatar
power seeker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 80
From: KCMO
Default

ive heard macs have fitment issues, im going with pacesetter, another question, without any back pressure, does that hurt our engines perf.?

im looking into exhaust,, i was going to do long tubes, to shorty h pipe, to flowmaster 40's and dump those, would that hurt my power at all? what kinda increase am i lookign at?
 
Old May 28, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #8  
crzypny232's Avatar
Licensed Pony Tuner
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 104
Default

Bwesky, A lack of back-pressure is said to hurt the V6 engine but I have installed the pacesetter kit with straightpipes after my cats and have had no problem with a loss of torque. Without having any factual evidence (dyno sheets) to back up what I just said, I can only tell you that I don't feel any difference in torque. I have talked to numerous mechanics and engineers on the subject and most have reasured me that the catalytic converters provide all of the backpressure that a v6 engine needs to remain efficient.
 
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:13 PM
  #9  
V6_Mustang_Power's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,808
Default

hey bro, if you wait and by the end of next week i'll have my new setup on. right now i have stock headers, cats and flowmaster 2 chamber catback. i posted up a video on here http://i269.photobucket.com/player.s...Picture198.flv thats it. thats with what i have now just a 2-chamber flowmaster catback w/ cats still on.

i orderd Mac Longtube Headers and a Shorty o/r H-pipe. so they will be on by the end of next week and i'll have a video up.
 
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #10  
bwesky's Avatar
power seeker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 80
From: KCMO
Default

ite cool, just keep us posted (by us i mean me)
 
Old May 29, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #11  
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 344
From: Edmond, OK
Default

MAC and someone else have headers.

But honestly stick with mid/catback. headers arent needed until you imporve the flow of the engine first.
 
Old May 29, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #12  
blk00stang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 103
From: springfield, mo
Default

Ok well thanks for all the input guys. Does anyone have the steeda catback dual exhaust? I just want to know how that sounds.
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:37 AM.