best sounding mustang
BTW this conversion cost less than a SC and way less than a turbo. and this is on a conservative tune , the engine only has about 1500 miles, with more aggressive tune it will have very close to 400rwhp. but thats not very fast
huh? fast? 350+ hp NA isnt fast? NA power is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy better than blower or nitrous power. Ive had nitrous and I drive a lightning everyday. nothing compares to the throttle response of NA.
BTW this conversion cost less than a SC and way less than a turbo. and this is on a conservative tune , the engine only has about 1500 miles, with more aggressive tune it will have very close to 400rwhp. but thats not very fast
BTW this conversion cost less than a SC and way less than a turbo. and this is on a conservative tune , the engine only has about 1500 miles, with more aggressive tune it will have very close to 400rwhp. but thats not very fast

livernois 3v heads
Blow by racing cams
mac LT's
catted H, borla CB
Kenne bell boost-a-pump
FRPP 36# injectors
its the stock block. it can be done with just heads ( heads bolt right on) and intake and a little bit of fabricating for real cheap, if yu want to know more detailing get in touch with DeWayne at www.loganmotorsports.com
uh....sounds very nice, but THIS is the best sounding Mustang
http://www.mcmmotorsports.com/virstang.wmv
http://www.mcmmotorsports.com/virstang.wmv
how necessary is it to get diferent internals? i got 75k on my car, it still runs very strong would i have to get different rods and pistons? and if you dont mind me asking about how much would it cost to do it without doin the internals and with doing them? thanks, Holmes
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Sponsors
1
Sep 25, 2015 06:15 AM




