Yellow GT with Black FR500's? Anybody have pics?
#4
Nope, 18's are too much rotating weight. Your quartermile time suffers as a result.
I'm actually going to go and look at Goldrush's old (manhattan mustangs) FR500's on saturday that his friend owns now. If they are in good shape, I am buying them from his friend. Go to the for sale section on MM for pics.
I'm actually going to go and look at Goldrush's old (manhattan mustangs) FR500's on saturday that his friend owns now. If they are in good shape, I am buying them from his friend. Go to the for sale section on MM for pics.
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Nope, 18's are too much rotating weight. Your quartermile time suffers as a result.
I'm actually going to go and look at Goldrush's old (manhattan mustangs) FR500's on saturday that his friend owns now. If they are in good shape, I am buying them from his friend. Go to the for sale section on MM for pics.
I'm actually going to go and look at Goldrush's old (manhattan mustangs) FR500's on saturday that his friend owns now. If they are in good shape, I am buying them from his friend. Go to the for sale section on MM for pics.
Do 17/9's in the front and 18/10 or 10.5 in the back.. You're already not going to be able to rotate your tires anyway. Might as well do it.. That is, unless you're going to get a much better deal on the FR's.
#9
When i got my 18's on my car it was a .2 difference consistant and it pissed me off and made me regret getting them, but i still like the look better. So expect to be slower for sure, and my car was stock went from a 14.2 to 14.4's all day.
#10
Thats why I'm getting 17's
#12
I has nothing to do with the weight of the wheel. It has to do with the rotating weight. It is kinda like a blower pulley. The smaller the pulley, the more revolutions it can make per second which equals more boost. A larger pulley is going to make less revolutions per second and equal less boost. Same principal with wheels.
#14
The Front tires in these pics are 275/40 KDWS
I think the back rims in this pic where the 17x10.5s w/ KDWS 285/40
P.S. I love my lil antenna ball.
#15
it has everything to do with the weight of the wheels. it's not just the weight, either, it's where the weight is located. when the weight is closer to the axle, the rotational inertia is much less than when the weight is further away from the axle. so even if 17's and 18's weighed the same, the 18's will accelerate slower, since the weight is further from the axle.
#17
Aye, I hardly ever go to the track, so I was more interested in the look than the weight. Weight never crossed my mind. The cost on the other hand, nearly gave me a coronary emboli, 18x10s and 295/35 BFGs aren't cheap. Thankfully, the mach isn't my daily driver and I don't beat up on it (much), so the tires will last for a very long time.
#18
Aye, I hardly ever go to the track, so I was more interested in the look than the weight. Weight never crossed my mind. The cost on the other hand, nearly gave me a coronary emboli, 18x10s and 295/35 BFGs aren't cheap. Thankfully, the mach isn't my daily driver and I don't beat up on it (much), so the tires will last for a very long time.
#19
yeah, i know what you mean... i got a good deal on my KDW's, but they're not cheap at all. and honestly, w/ a good set of tires (like BFGs) I believe the traction gained more than makes up for the weight difference. i guess you could make the argument that the same tires in 17' would still be faster, but what the hell.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
V6_Mustang_Power
Show, Shine, and Tunes!
5
07-07-2008 05:09 PM