Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Gas mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-08-2006 | 06:07 PM
TEXASPAUL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
official youngest member!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 981
From: Oklahoma
Default Gas mods

i know im gona get a crap load of "dont get a stang if ya want good gas mialage"

but what are some mods that will help gas mileage and tell me if it helps perf. as well


note: dont mention gears , i just want to talk about other stuff.
 
  #2  
Old 02-08-2006 | 06:29 PM
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Drive like an old grandma
 
  #4  
Old 02-08-2006 | 06:36 PM
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I've definately lost MPG with my full exhaust set up
 
  #7  
Old 02-08-2006 | 06:42 PM
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Well those taillights have been off now for a month, lol. Still bad MPG
 
  #9  
Old 02-08-2006 | 06:48 PM
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

87 on stock tune which is what I had used before i installed the exhaust. I still run 87 sometimes and it's worst than it was before exhaust.

I use 93 in summer but I cant compare that cuz i never used it before my exhaust
 
  #11  
Old 02-08-2006 | 06:52 PM
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I would... but with my tune I got my shifts real firm since I'm auto and I dont wanna have firm shifts and hanging in gears with snow on the ground. I'm about to put back on my summer wheels and that tune in about a month
 
  #12  
Old 02-08-2006 | 07:28 PM
TEXASPAUL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
official youngest member!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 981
From: Oklahoma
Default

would it be cheaper overall to get better mileage with a higher octane than lower mileage on lower octane?
 
  #13  
Old 02-08-2006 | 08:14 PM
jeredan2003's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,787
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Default

Originally Posted by TEXASPAUL
would it be cheaper overall to get better mileage with a higher octane than lower mileage on lower octane?
No it wont be cheaper. You wont even notice any differnce except the 93 octane will drain your pocket. Using 93 octane DOESNT give you better gas mileage.

If you are on stock tune with no power adder you should use 87 octane. 93 will only cost more. If you have boost or a tune then you need 93 octane.

For better MPG the only things you can really do is: Full Exhast, K&N FIPK Intake, Steeda Underdrive Pulleys, Run more air pressure in your tires, Run thinner motor oil, Remove weight, Lose weight FATTY.....:loser:

But I have all that done and my MPG isnt ALL THAT much better than stock. But every dollar counts!
 
  #15  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:23 PM
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Yea, Just wandering maybe your car responds different than the later models???

I don't notice a difference with 93 gas on stock tune.
 
  #16  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:24 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

"dont get a V8 stang if ya want good gas mialage"
 
  #18  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:28 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
ha ha... in reality though... v6s arent that much better...

IN FACT...

my 5.0 get better MPG than quite a few late mdel v6's... not just stangs
its because they fall on their face at 4300 rpm. lol
 
  #21  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:36 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
ha ha ha...

ya know... i've always wondered... if ford used the same displacement except the made the bore larger and the stroke shorter... how much better would our cars run?

the shorter stroke would allow the engine to rev higher...

i mean... that why them street bikes and formula 1 cars rev so high...

Ya think our cars would put out more hp?
Of course, thats why built 5.0s are freakin NASTY! Stock they arent worth a damn in all honesty. Well.. IMO anyways.
 
  #23  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:40 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

Theres no point going past 6200 in all honesty. most people shift before 6200 anyways while racing, especially with stock gearing. My rev limiter is at 6500.
 
  #25  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:47 PM
stanger00's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

buy a beater to save gas.
 
  #26  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:51 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

Originally Posted by stanger00
buy a beater to save gas.
My beater is worse than my mustang with gas. haha
 
  #27  
Old 02-08-2006 | 10:53 PM
stanger00's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,842
From: Pinole, Ca
Default

so was mine so i got rid of it its sad too because it was a 86 crx si. you have that k5 or bronco so of course it would do better.
 
  #28  
Old 02-09-2006 | 12:58 AM
Stevoneo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 598
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

if you have a complete open exhaust except for mufflers and are not using forced induction, than yes you will hurt your gas millage. being non forced induction actually makes your engine work harder because of a serious loss in back pressure. If you are pretty much stock, there is no reason to open the exhuast all up except for the sound factor
 
  #29  
Old 02-09-2006 | 01:10 PM
americanstang's Avatar
Pure Bread
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
well yeh... once ya reach a certain RPM the hp starts to go back down...

i dont shift past 5200... i can actually feel it slow down after that
yea after i get in the upper 5000rpm range i can feal the car start to max out and then loose horsies. so i usually shift around 52 or 54
and i have the same year car as u my friend
 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34 PM.