Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Recalibrating MAF???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-09-2004 | 03:07 PM
MustangMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 87
From: Miami
Cool Recalibrating MAF???

I have a 04 GT which the only mod i have is an SLP loudmouth cat-back, and i was looking into buyign an 80mm MAF, but would i have to calibrate the ecu for it or can i just swap it on?? i also have a K&N straight through design intake, but have not installed it yet..

-Mike =)
 
  #2  
Old 12-09-2004 | 03:25 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

You really need to have the car dyno tuned with a MAF replacement. It is really a pointless mod unless you are putting down so much power that the stock MAF is maxed out. (350 rwhp or even more)
 
  #3  
Old 12-10-2004 | 09:36 AM
Chopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 257
From: Parkersburg Wv.
Default

I just ran across an old article in MMFF and they installed an 85 mm C&L kit on a box stock 02 GT.This returned 9 hp and 9 ft lbs of torque at the rear wheels. BUT this kit comes with a K&N filter and it makes me wonder how much of the increase is the meter and how much is the filter?
 
  #4  
Old 12-10-2004 | 11:12 AM
MustangMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 87
From: Miami
Exclamation

Originally Posted by Chopper
I just ran across an old article in MMFF and they installed an 85 mm C&L kit on a box stock 02 GT.This returned 9 hp and 9 ft lbs of torque at the rear wheels. BUT this kit comes with a K&N filter and it makes me wonder how much of the increase is the meter and how much is the filter?
yeah i have actually seen that same article, im pretty sure. I am actually waiting to install my K&N intake, but i have heard from many peopel that getting the larger MAF not to 80 but maybe to 75mm to go along with a C&L intake plenum and 75 mm throttle body..but the real question is if i have to recalibrate my ecu for the maf change?

-Mike
 
  #5  
Old 12-10-2004 | 06:51 PM
mike sweeney's Avatar
Senior Gear Banger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 230
From: Two Harbors, MN.
Default

Dont bother with and aftermarket MAF untill you reach about 325 RWHP. they cause more problems than gains on near stock vehicles. I would go with Headers, Gears, X-Pipe or an Intake Plenum first.
 
  #6  
Old 12-10-2004 | 08:47 PM
Chopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 257
From: Parkersburg Wv.
Default

Originally Posted by MustangMike
yeah i have actually seen that same article, im pretty sure. I am actually waiting to install my K&N intake, but i have heard from many peopel that getting the larger MAF not to 80 but maybe to 75mm to go along with a C&L intake plenum and 75 mm throttle body..but the real question is if i have to recalibrate my ecu for the maf change?

-Mike
I'm wondering if the HP increase comes from the parts or the change in the fuel air ratio???Ford would give a safe A/F ratio to the box to keep from making holes in pistons.The ECU will compensate for a wide range of add on parts,so don't worry about that.
 
  #7  
Old 12-10-2004 | 10:31 PM
04GTMikey's Avatar
Stang Maniac
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 170
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mike sweeney
Dont bother with and aftermarket MAF untill you reach about 325 RWHP. they cause more problems than gains on near stock vehicles. I would go with Headers, Gears, X-Pipe or an Intake Plenum first.
Yeah! What he said. Your stock Maf is all you need right now.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
serum114
Modular 4.6L Tech
4
08-13-2005 08:48 PM
1#VenomStang
General Tech Forum
7
08-10-2005 03:03 PM
brucespot
Modular 4.6L Tech
7
06-28-2005 11:12 AM
redfire04
Modular 4.6L Tech
5
04-11-2005 06:53 AM
stanger00
General Tech Forum
6
11-25-2004 10:52 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:06 AM.