How to get 400rwhp???
#2
So much easier and cheaper to just slap a basic Procharger,Vortec,Paxton kit and be well over that and safe with a good tune.
Otherwise your looking at cams,ported heads, full bolt on's etc... and still with a stock short block you won't be there.
Otherwise your looking at cams,ported heads, full bolt on's etc... and still with a stock short block you won't be there.
#3
exactly.
WAY cheaper to just get a supercharger kit and a tune.
#5
but for 400 RWHP on an otherwise stock motor? (except a tune)
Id think that would take a lot of juice to make a figure like that. Too much given the basically stock engine.
#9
Actually full bolt-ons (LTs, intake) , cams, heads, and a tune can net you veryyy close to 400whp and you'll easily beat any SC/TC 400rwhp car because of the full power band.
The 3V also can handle it N/A as long as you don't go with some extreme cams or something super stupid.
The 3V also can handle it N/A as long as you don't go with some extreme cams or something super stupid.
#12
I don't much like blower cars myself (yes, despite the fact that I own a turbo car and a blower car). That said, you want fast and cost effective, a supercharger is it. I think you'll have a great time with that and a set of upgraded brakes.
don't overlook the brakes. I don't want to hear about you killing yourself because you had more go than stop.
don't overlook the brakes. I don't want to hear about you killing yourself because you had more go than stop.
#14
Get some Hawk HPS pads and just make sure you break them in so you don't crystallize them.
And BTW you'll need a caliper compressor tool from Autozone or O'Reilleys because the rears have a special mechanism that has to be compressed and turned.
I myself would much rather go with a KB kit than the E-Force, or even more so a ProCharger but to each his own. Never liked the lower power limit of Ebelbrocks stuff. Meanwhile with the KB you can go as far as the car can handle.
#15
I made up my mind to just the Baer brakes already. The E-Force can get me as fas as I feel I need to go. They have some cars that have gotten up to 600hp and I don't think I need to be any where near that.
#18
Ohh and if you get the Baer/Hawk set-up get the pads from Lethal Performance and the rotor set-up from LMP Performace. Both are the cheapest and have awesome shipping and service.
#19
Actually full bolt-ons (LTs, intake) , cams, heads, and a tune can net you veryyy close to 400whp and you'll easily beat any SC/TC 400rwhp car because of the full power band.
The 3V also can handle it N/A as long as you don't go with some extreme cams or something super stupid.
The 3V also can handle it N/A as long as you don't go with some extreme cams or something super stupid.
#21
I have seen the 3v cars get near it, but never over 400rwhp with a stock short block. Sure with high compression pistons its been done, but I have never seen or even heard of a stock compression/stock short block doing it.
#22
But, even so thats a helluva lot of horsepower with a beautiful *** power curve when compared to slapping on a Procharger and losing low-end power, or losing top-end with the twin-screws.
Yes, it is more expensive but I'd much rather have a bad *** N/A motor to work with when I decide to go with FI.
Livernois Stage II heads with a Stage 2 blower cam and THEN adding on a P1 or D1 would kick ***. Talk about intimidation factor. The lope of the cams plus the whistle of a P1 would make me roll up my window and turn away if that pulled up next to me at a red light.
#23
Actually full bolt-ons (LTs, intake) , cams, heads, and a tune can net you veryyy close to 400whp and you'll easily beat any SC/TC 400rwhp car because of the full power band.
The 3V also can handle it N/A as long as you don't go with some extreme cams or something super stupid.
The 3V also can handle it N/A as long as you don't go with some extreme cams or something super stupid.
Ya the powerband would be nice but that will cost alot to achieve 400rwhp n/a...Like said already a s/c would be the cheaper way to go about achieving 400+rwhp...Although you will make more than 400rwhp running the stock pulley most likely with a s/c.
#24
I didn't necessarily say OVER 400rwhp, just very close (meaning 370-380+ to the rear wheels). Sorry.
But, even so thats a helluva lot of horsepower with a beautiful *** power curve when compared to slapping on a Procharger and losing low-end power, or losing top-end with the twin-screws.
Yes, it is more expensive but I'd much rather have a bad *** N/A motor to work with when I decide to go with FI.
Livernois Stage II heads with a Stage 2 blower cam and THEN adding on a P1 or D1 would kick ***. Talk about intimidation factor. The lope of the cams plus the whistle of a P1 would make me roll up my window and turn away if that pulled up next to me at a red light.
But, even so thats a helluva lot of horsepower with a beautiful *** power curve when compared to slapping on a Procharger and losing low-end power, or losing top-end with the twin-screws.
Yes, it is more expensive but I'd much rather have a bad *** N/A motor to work with when I decide to go with FI.
Livernois Stage II heads with a Stage 2 blower cam and THEN adding on a P1 or D1 would kick ***. Talk about intimidation factor. The lope of the cams plus the whistle of a P1 would make me roll up my window and turn away if that pulled up next to me at a red light.
So pick a place you want to go and stick with it.
#25
With only 281 inches to work with you're relying on an optimized motor and very high rpm to make anywhere near 400 to the tires NA. With a twin screw you'll have the power from just off idle all the way to redline. If you only want 400rwhp with a twin screw you can do it on a stock motor. See the Saleen setup for S197's.
I would only use a centrifugal in places where you're limited on packaging space and where you can't use a turbo or a twin screw.
I would only use a centrifugal in places where you're limited on packaging space and where you can't use a turbo or a twin screw.
#26
Efficiency. Cars suck in the first place so why make it even worse by just slapping on a SC? That would be like doing cams without doing LTs. You're just restricting the power but going the cheap way out.
#29
Putting on a SC with stock cams, stock heads, maybe LTs, stock intake (only used if not twin-screw) is putting it in its worse situation. In order to get big power it means you're going to have to put in a smaller pulley and put more stress on the SC and the other belt-driven devices.
Versus if you have a set of good heads, a blower cam, an aftermarket intake, and LTs you could put on a SC and leave it at stock boost but still make big power.
If you're going to put money into the car then I don't see why you'd go the cheap route to get power versus doing it right.
Thats what I meant by efficiency. Stock heads, cams, and manifolds are going to kill any FI system.
Idk, I mean sure it's expensive but it also makes a huge difference. I know TONS of people who just slap on a $4,000 Procharger kit and say ta-da, but thats nothing special.
Versus I know one guy with stage II livernois heads, stage II blower cams, kooks LTs, and the C&L intake manifold making close to 550hp with a p1 at only 6psi (i believe). That to me is way more badass of a car versus just a stock motor with a SC slapped on it.
If you want a badass car for cheap go with a 100-shot of nitrous and bolt-ons. Otherwise I would want to build the motor before just slapping a SC. Idk. It just seems boring to just slap on a SC. Versus doing n/a first and then going for FI if you need more.
Versus if you have a set of good heads, a blower cam, an aftermarket intake, and LTs you could put on a SC and leave it at stock boost but still make big power.
If you're going to put money into the car then I don't see why you'd go the cheap route to get power versus doing it right.
Thats what I meant by efficiency. Stock heads, cams, and manifolds are going to kill any FI system.
Idk, I mean sure it's expensive but it also makes a huge difference. I know TONS of people who just slap on a $4,000 Procharger kit and say ta-da, but thats nothing special.
Versus I know one guy with stage II livernois heads, stage II blower cams, kooks LTs, and the C&L intake manifold making close to 550hp with a p1 at only 6psi (i believe). That to me is way more badass of a car versus just a stock motor with a SC slapped on it.
If you want a badass car for cheap go with a 100-shot of nitrous and bolt-ons. Otherwise I would want to build the motor before just slapping a SC. Idk. It just seems boring to just slap on a SC. Versus doing n/a first and then going for FI if you need more.
#30
Putting on a SC with stock cams, stock heads, maybe LTs, stock intake (only used if not twin-screw) is putting it in its worse situation. In order to get big power it means you're going to have to put in a smaller pulley and put more stress on the SC and the other belt-driven devices.
Versus if you have a set of good heads, a blower cam, an aftermarket intake, and LTs you could put on a SC and leave it at stock boost but still make big power.
If you're going to put money into the car then I don't see why you'd go the cheap route to get power versus doing it right.
Thats what I meant by efficiency. Stock heads, cams, and manifolds are going to kill any FI system.
Idk, I mean sure it's expensive but it also makes a huge difference. I know TONS of people who just slap on a $4,000 Procharger kit and say ta-da, but thats nothing special.
Versus I know one guy with stage II livernois heads, stage II blower cams, kooks LTs, and the C&L intake manifold making close to 550hp with a p1 at only 6psi (i believe). That to me is way more badass of a car versus just a stock motor with a SC slapped on it.
If you want a badass car for cheap go with a 100-shot of nitrous and bolt-ons. Otherwise I would want to build the motor before just slapping a SC. Idk. It just seems boring to just slap on a SC. Versus doing n/a first and then going for FI if you need more.
Versus if you have a set of good heads, a blower cam, an aftermarket intake, and LTs you could put on a SC and leave it at stock boost but still make big power.
If you're going to put money into the car then I don't see why you'd go the cheap route to get power versus doing it right.
Thats what I meant by efficiency. Stock heads, cams, and manifolds are going to kill any FI system.
Idk, I mean sure it's expensive but it also makes a huge difference. I know TONS of people who just slap on a $4,000 Procharger kit and say ta-da, but thats nothing special.
Versus I know one guy with stage II livernois heads, stage II blower cams, kooks LTs, and the C&L intake manifold making close to 550hp with a p1 at only 6psi (i believe). That to me is way more badass of a car versus just a stock motor with a SC slapped on it.
If you want a badass car for cheap go with a 100-shot of nitrous and bolt-ons. Otherwise I would want to build the motor before just slapping a SC. Idk. It just seems boring to just slap on a SC. Versus doing n/a first and then going for FI if you need more.
IF your looking for 400rwhp and don't have 10+grand to throw at your car then just buy a procharger, novi, or a vortech blower on the car and call it a day.