The Lounge This is the General Talk forum.

possible new v6 engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-17-2009 | 06:11 AM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default possible new v6 engine

Originally Posted by Lazerred6
The base 6 should be a rwd version of one of those lincoln engines that puts out 300hp

http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-for...re-37l-v6.html

OMG I so called it
 
  #2  
Old 06-17-2009 | 06:16 AM
SPiNz's Avatar
V10 POWER!
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 320
From: Miami/Kendall, FL
Default

thats crazy, the new v6 stangs will probably be faster then an 05 GT.

People are going to kill themselves with 300HP base model cars
 
  #3  
Old 06-17-2009 | 06:23 AM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

Originally Posted by SPiNz
thats crazy, the new v6 stangs will probably be faster then an 05 GT.

People are going to kill themselves with 300HP base model cars
Chevy raised the bar so for had to follow but I agree, that new boby style with about 300hp for around 22k will kill some folks
 
  #4  
Old 06-17-2009 | 08:13 AM
NeedACobra's Avatar
What is best in life?
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,117
From: Gulf Breeze, Florida.
Default

So let me get this straight.
They're going to stick a 3.7L engine into the new v6 stangs and push out damn near 300hp, and Im still gonna be stuck with my 3.8 that only has MAYBE 153hp? what. the. ****. I really need to start saving my damn money for a cobra.
 
  #5  
Old 06-17-2009 | 08:20 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by NeedACobra
So let me get this straight.
They're going to stick a 3.7L engine into the new v6 stangs and push out damn near 300hp, and Im still gonna be stuck with my 3.8 that only has MAYBE 153hp? what. the. ****. I really need to start saving my damn money for a cobra.
Well your car is 11-15 years old. There are civics faster now.
 
  #6  
Old 06-17-2009 | 08:24 AM
NeedACobra's Avatar
What is best in life?
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,117
From: Gulf Breeze, Florida.
Default

Yeah. Thanks for reminding me that Im way behind the times.
They need to just stop buidling base model cars that are faster than mine..
Is that really too much to ask for?
 
  #7  
Old 06-17-2009 | 08:38 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by NeedACobra
Yeah. Thanks for reminding me that Im way behind the times.
They need to just stop buidling base model cars that are faster than mine..
Is that really too much to ask for?
Hell the newer Camrys have just as much horsepower as my car, stock for stock.
 
  #8  
Old 06-17-2009 | 08:47 AM
NeedACobra's Avatar
What is best in life?
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,117
From: Gulf Breeze, Florida.
Default

I wish my credit didnt suck cause I would be all for making a payment on a 2010 v6 if it had 300 horses.
 
  #9  
Old 06-17-2009 | 09:56 AM
White04GT's Avatar
KenneBell Blown
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,287
From: Kingwood, Tx.
Default

Ya that will all be nice, but I still like the 99-04 body style over the 2 newer styles...Ya I will keep my built 2v and be happy with my 600rwhp GT.
 
  #10  
Old 06-17-2009 | 10:29 AM
10507158's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 112
From: Statesboro, GA
Default

dont buy the car if u cant handle the horses and no its not gon kill people any more than any other car
who is going to be able to afford that and would WANT it FOR hp
there are way better cars to get 300 hp out of for the price(used cars)

thats a bad *** car though for the price
i dont think u can beat it
 
  #11  
Old 06-17-2009 | 10:47 AM
krazypony's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,094
From: Liberty, SC
Default

Hell wasnt it recently they went with a 3.9 or if we need to say 4.0L so be it...why go back down to a 3.7L ?

Hell if they bump it up to that amount of HP out of a v6 and still have great gas mileage for a good price, I would consider it
 
  #12  
Old 06-17-2009 | 11:37 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

I highly doubt this car will be 22K, but we'll see. I'll say at least 25k.
 
  #13  
Old 06-17-2009 | 11:40 AM
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Lazerred6
Actually I called it.....like a year ago...
 
  #14  
Old 06-17-2009 | 05:25 PM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

Originally Posted by 08mustang_gt
Actually I called it.....like a year ago...
If you can't prove it then it didn't happen
 
  #15  
Old 06-18-2009 | 12:02 AM
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Lazerred6
If you can't prove it then it didn't happen
https://mustangboards.com/lounge/335...em-yes-no.html

13th post down...

Thank you. Come again.
 
  #16  
Old 06-18-2009 | 12:11 AM
King's Avatar
iDontcare
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,432
From: Colorado
Default

I completely forgot about NewEdge. lol.
 
  #17  
Old 06-18-2009 | 07:31 AM
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by King
I completely forgot about NewEdge. lol.
Is it just me or does it seem like a lot of people have been laying low on this forum? Kinda sad....
 
  #18  
Old 06-18-2009 | 09:33 AM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

Originally Posted by 08mustang_gt
https://mustangboards.com/lounge/335...em-yes-no.html

13th post down...

Thank you. Come again.
Thats a totally different motor the 3.7 is not a turbo motor
 
  #19  
Old 06-18-2009 | 11:09 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by 08mustang_gt
https://mustangboards.com/lounge/335...em-yes-no.html

13th post down...

Thank you. Come again.
In all fairness it was only like 7 months ago, so not quite a year. hahaha. Plus you got insider information.
 
  #20  
Old 06-18-2009 | 06:36 PM
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Lazerred6
Thats a totally different motor the 3.7 is not a turbo motor
Same thing. We've already discussed how it'll most likely go.

NA V6 < NA V8 < TT V6 < SC V8

Originally Posted by 00blkstanggt
In all fairness it was only like 7 months ago, so not quite a year. hahaha. Plus you got insider information.
Haha well it was long enough ago. And insider information? Blue Oval is available to everyone you just got to go read it. Same as Left Lane. But, in all fairness you're correct.
 
  #21  
Old 06-18-2009 | 09:28 PM
SnTBakosFinest's Avatar
Nitrous Injected 3.8
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,881
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

They'll have the base model. And then they'll have either a twin turbo, or a single turbo model. Why they are going to a smaller engine for this, I don't know, maybe so the GTs they make will stay above the v6's lol. However, the 5.0 is coming back.
 
  #22  
Old 06-18-2009 | 09:35 PM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

 
  #23  
Old 06-19-2009 | 08:21 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by SnTBakosFinest
They'll have the base model. And then they'll have either a twin turbo, or a single turbo model. Why they are going to a smaller engine for this, I don't know, maybe so the GTs they make will stay above the v6's lol. However, the 5.0 is coming back.
The gas mileage will probably be better going to the smaller displacement, but who knows. The 5.0 would be cool to have, but once my car is supercharged, I probably won't care anymore. haha
 
  #24  
Old 06-19-2009 | 09:02 AM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

yeah but imagine a blown five-oh

I'm betting that when the aftermarket picks up on these guys will get those things to 600hp without a whole lot of trouble.
 
  #25  
Old 06-20-2009 | 09:03 AM
Lazerred6's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pocket Rocket
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,791
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

I read that to switch form FWD to RWD they will have to redesign the intake manifold and the exhaust headers. If they do a good job with those and maybe add direct port injection it's possible for once that the base model mustang will do more than just lag behind the camaro..... It's already going to kill the challenger lol
 
  #26  
Old 06-20-2009 | 11:46 AM
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by Lazerred6
I read that to switch form FWD to RWD they will have to redesign the intake manifold and the exhaust headers. If they do a good job with those and maybe add direct port injection it's possible for once that the base model mustang will do more than just lag behind the camaro..... It's already going to kill the challenger lol
Never speak of the challenger. It's a disgrace to American society.
 
  #27  
Old 06-20-2009 | 01:03 PM
FlawlessEnvy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 232
From: Northern Virginia
Default

well what happens when 2015 rolls around and Obamas "all production cars must make at least 33mpg happens?"
 
  #28  
Old 06-20-2009 | 01:56 PM
jseven's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 821
Default

thats why you buy your 5.0s in 2011
 
  #29  
Old 06-20-2009 | 02:18 PM
krenogin's Avatar
A pony.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,782
From: Kentucky
Default

thats when u tell obama to go play with hisself, and do donuts around him in his "smart for-two" and say "bubby do that in your 50mpg car!"
 
  #30  
Old 06-20-2009 | 05:47 PM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by FlawlessEnvy
well what happens when 2015 rolls around and Obamas "all production cars must make at least 33mpg happens?"
I didn't think it was all production cars had to have 33mpg, I thought it was the average had to be 33mpg. So say all the cars Ford makes, the average out of all of them has to be 33mpg. I could be wrong, but I don't see all cars having the gas mileage. It won't happen cause they will put out a lot of car companies out of business.
 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:57 AM.