The Lounge This is the General Talk forum.

Well Its been fun V8.... :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-22-2007 | 10:55 AM
mstg97's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 179
Exclamation Well Its been fun V8.... :(

I dont know if you guys keep up with politics but this issue directly effects us.

http://themustangnews.com/fomoco_07/st-1207cafe.htm

The above article talks about a bill called Cafe (escalating Corporate Average Fuel Economy) It will force starting 2011 that all car makers raise their average fuel economy by 40% up from the 27.5 that it is now and by 2020 the average mpg must be 35mpg! The bill was signed 12/19/07 It looks as if the past is going to repeat itself. Have a read. Any thoughts?
 
  #2  
Old 12-22-2007 | 12:02 PM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,312
From: Mexico
Default

The government is full of ****..
 
  #3  
Old 12-22-2007 | 12:08 PM
Cheddarbob's Avatar
Haul ass on regular gas
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,149
From: San Diego, CA and Boca Raton, FL
Default

oh come on now. Car companies can 35 mpg out of there cars now they just dont its not that hard it just costs them more to do it so they dont.

im not worried about it they will never get rid of the V8 ever!!!
 
  #4  
Old 12-22-2007 | 12:34 PM
HighSchoolGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 100
From: Albuquerque
Default

yeah im not so sure about that... i think its just a load of bullshit
 
  #5  
Old 12-22-2007 | 12:46 PM
WNRacing's Avatar
KWITCHERBITCHIN
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,024
From: Gallatin, TN
Default

They've been "talking" about this forever.. still hasn't happened....
 
  #6  
Old 12-22-2007 | 02:24 PM
madmatt's Avatar
Traitor...lol
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,939
From: Lexington, SC
Default

LOL we'll see about that...
 
  #7  
Old 12-22-2007 | 04:03 PM
SnTBakosFinest's Avatar
Nitrous Injected 3.8
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,881
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

...its not possible.. I mean...wtf are people going to do without v8 trucks? get 8 hondas to pull the same thing? ;x
 
  #8  
Old 12-22-2007 | 04:05 PM
yellowstang99's Avatar
35th Anniversary GT
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
From: Evansville, IN
Default

i love my 13 mpg car! haha. This just means all of our cars will go up in value b/c they will became rare. They should just go back to a four cylinder mustang and make it so it gets 35mpg. Nothing says we cant swap a v8 into it after it leaves the dealership. I will keep my v8 forever, but maybe pick up a STI or something like that down the road as well...
 
  #9  
Old 12-22-2007 | 05:36 PM
CarnageCAB's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 152
From: Lugoff, South Carolina
Default

nooo i would die if this happened. im still in high school and im lucky and happy to have my sixer. but i would totally rather have a GT. and was planning to get one when i graduated from college. but i gotta go for six years....


and yeah if this did happen old gt's would be rare. and to buy a v8 and get it installed would cost an arm and a leg
 
  #10  
Old 12-22-2007 | 06:01 PM
twocwbrooks's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
Default

should I be glad I"m 55 and likely might miss most of this ****?
 
  #11  
Old 12-22-2007 | 07:11 PM
3.8for the win's Avatar
Evolution 9
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,887
Default

i dont think we have any thing to worry. about the 8 will all ways be the king of the street i think if they make this happen they will just put some kind of tax on the 8s.
 
  #12  
Old 12-22-2007 | 07:29 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

cafe is fleet average for included vehicles. it will never remove larger engines but it will increase the requirement to get alternative fuels out and accepted.
 
  #13  
Old 12-22-2007 | 07:44 PM
todd03blown's Avatar
Blowns the only way!!!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 788
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
cafe is fleet average for included vehicles. it will never remove larger engines but it will increase the requirement to get alternative fuels out and accepted.
great post!!
 
  #14  
Old 12-22-2007 | 09:33 PM
yellowstang99's Avatar
35th Anniversary GT
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
From: Evansville, IN
Default

todd, your need to post one more time. Look at your post count....666....
 
  #15  
Old 12-22-2007 | 09:34 PM
todd03blown's Avatar
Blowns the only way!!!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 788
Default

Originally Posted by yellowstang99
todd, your need to post one more time. Look at your post count....666....
Thanks dude!!!

Noticed you are in Evansville, my favorite baseball player is from there!!
 
  #16  
Old 12-23-2007 | 12:37 AM
mstg97's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 179
Default well

Well the bill has already been passed and its a average mpg for all the cars in a givin company just one 500hp gt500 with 15mpg will bring down their average by a lot and dont forget ford doesnt have a single car with 35 mpg they are going to have to invest a lot of their revenue to meet these new requirments i personally think the day of "new" muscle cars is over at least they will be few and far between to many people scared of global warming so buy the perfect mustang you want in the next few years instant classics!
 
  #17  
Old 12-23-2007 | 01:09 AM
WNRacing's Avatar
KWITCHERBITCHIN
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,024
From: Gallatin, TN
Default

Well, I guess that would depend upon what their definition of "Brand" is... The ford "family" includes Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda, Jaguar and Land Rover..

As far as ford not having any 35mpg vehicles..

Focus = 35Mpg
Escape Hybrid = 34Mpg

Obviously that's not much to work with, but with alternative fuels and innovation, 35Mpg Average within 12 years shouldn't be much of an issue..
 
  #18  
Old 12-23-2007 | 07:33 AM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

I fully support laws to increase mpg. Getting to 35 mpg by 2020 is sad if you ask me. It should be more like 50 mpg.

Did you know that VW has a car in Europe that gets 65 mpg? And you can buy it right dam now if you are over there.

I think these laws are healthy in a lot of ways, because it forces a fleet average. It also means that they have to build affordable, high-milage vehicles, because otherwise they won't sell.

Keep in mind that gas prices could be twice what they are now by 2020. Look at what has happened in the last 12 years. Gas was $1.40 a gallon (in today's dollars)....now it is $3.00. Don't think $6.00 can't happen.

If we start bombing Iran, we will all be taking the bus to work. In 1981 when the Iran/Iraq Wa started, gas prices jumped $1.00. If we were to bomb Iran today, I would expect prices to jump in the $5.00 range over night.

This is EXACTLY why we need to improve fuel efficiency. Not because of price, but so we can stop relying on foreign oil. Guys, this is an accident waiting to happen and it is going to happen.
 
  #19  
Old 12-23-2007 | 08:56 AM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

w00t

I can't wait for E85 myself. Sure I'll have to install a 25 gallon tank and 42lb injectors but it's 120 octane... I can have 14:1 compression on the street.
 
  #20  
Old 12-23-2007 | 01:30 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Don't get too excited. I live in the land of E-85! It is everywhere here, but the quality is too variable to be reliably used the way you would want it. The ethonal concentration can range from 70 to 85% and so the octane changes from 105 to about 120. The changes are pretty much seasonal as there are different blends. Perhaps in Ca this would not be too much of an issue, but can you imagine having a 120 octane tune, but then pump 105 into the car?
 
  #21  
Old 12-23-2007 | 03:51 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

gulp... BANG!
 
  #22  
Old 12-23-2007 | 05:23 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Exactly! Already been happening. There is a tuner in the area that is doing pretty well with E-85 tunes. I may actually do it in the summer. The trick is to tune the car for worst blend, but then you leave power on the table. Follow me?
 
  #23  
Old 12-23-2007 | 08:37 PM
jjtgiants's Avatar
jjtgiants
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,177
From: Dublin, CA
Default

I don't have a problem with the law....I'm sure they will continue to produce the V-8, but add a nice gas guzzler tax to it or something, which they already do. (at least in Cali). Or what if they produced V-8's that would allow the owner to shut off 4 of the cylinders on the freeway and achieve the goals? I think Chevy might be doing that already with some of their trucks
 
  #24  
Old 12-23-2007 | 09:09 PM
PColav6's Avatar
FYL.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,493
From: Pensacola, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by jjtgiants
I don't have a problem with the law....I'm sure they will continue to produce the V-8, but add a nice gas guzzler tax to it or something, which they already do. (at least in Cali). Or what if they produced V-8's that would allow the owner to shut off 4 of the cylinders on the freeway and achieve the goals? I think Chevy might be doing that already with some of their trucks
I think they call that DOD "Displacement on Demand" or some ****, and there was speculation of it being in the 010 mustangs
 

Last edited by PColav6; 12-23-2007 at 10:38 PM.
  #25  
Old 12-23-2007 | 10:21 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Chevy and Chrysler are doing that now on most if not all of their V-8's. Just keep in mind, you only save if you keep your foot off the gas.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
K.G.B.
Videos
17
03-16-2010 07:23 PM
Moddapalooza
General Tech Forum
4
02-11-2008 09:46 PM
foncarelli
The Lounge
19
05-24-2007 03:24 PM
stevemainian
Pictures
12
07-14-2006 10:35 PM
4.6 Love
The Lounge
14
09-01-2005 12:56 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:41 AM.