The Lounge This is the General Talk forum.

My dilema

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-21-2006 | 08:37 PM
cooper's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 65
From: New Mexico
Default My dilema

Ok, I have a 2000 Gt that i thoroughly enjoy (see sig) but has recently been giving me problems (transmission crapping out for one) I also have a degenerative joint disease in my knees that makes using a clutch difficult at times and is only going to get worse. Ok, I have the opportunity to buy an automatic Mach 1 (2004, 15000 miles) for a really good price. So my question. What would you do?
Cheers for any feedback
Cooper
 
  #2  
Old 08-21-2006 | 08:47 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

If you can afford it, then hell yes go for the Mach.
 
  #3  
Old 08-21-2006 | 08:48 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

get rid of it while you can for the mach 1. with upgrades you can make that mach 1 auto really fly like a manual trans would.
 
  #4  
Old 08-21-2006 | 08:49 PM
ThePunisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 632
Default

Originally Posted by cooper
Ok, I have a 2000 Gt that i thoroughly enjoy (see sig) but has recently been giving me problems (transmission crapping out for one) I also have a degenerative joint disease in my knees that makes using a clutch difficult at times and is only going to get worse. Ok, I have the opportunity to buy an automatic Mach 1 (2004, 15000 miles) for a really good price. So my question. What would you do?
Cheers for any feedback
Cooper
I say go for it.
 
  #5  
Old 08-21-2006 | 08:50 PM
DarkSith's Avatar
Victory Is Mine
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
From: Lake City, SC
Default

Buy the mach...
 
  #6  
Old 08-21-2006 | 08:50 PM
PColav6's Avatar
FYL.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,493
From: Pensacola, Florida
Default

Do it!, and you'll be happy resting your injured leg on the dead pedal.
 
  #7  
Old 08-21-2006 | 09:00 PM
GREG@SN95's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
Default

if yer worried bout the auto making power to the wheels... a nicely built auto can out perform a stick...

If ya got the money
If ya can spare the money
If ya want it

then why the heck not?
 
  #8  
Old 08-21-2006 | 09:04 PM
CCM's Avatar
CCM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,395
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Mach 1's have way more potential than GTs. Definitely go for it.
 
  #9  
Old 08-21-2006 | 09:20 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

A high hp auto will always out do a high hp manual. Even for lower hp levels Id prefer auto over manual.
 
  #10  
Old 08-21-2006 | 09:39 PM
PColav6's Avatar
FYL.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,493
From: Pensacola, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
A high hp auto will always out do a high hp manual. Even for lower hp levels Id prefer auto over manual.
But autos suck *** at shifting.

mine anyway.
 
  #11  
Old 08-21-2006 | 09:43 PM
GREG@SN95's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
Default

Originally Posted by PColav6
But autos suck *** at shifting.

mine anyway.
stock ****ty tranny... duh... get a chip / tune
 
  #12  
Old 08-21-2006 | 10:34 PM
CCM's Avatar
CCM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,395
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by PColav6
But autos suck *** at shifting.

mine anyway.
Actually autos don't suck *** at shifting. They can shift way faster than probably 95% of drivers with manual transmissions, if not 100%.
 
  #13  
Old 08-21-2006 | 10:53 PM
232forme's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
Default

Originally Posted by CCM
Actually autos don't suck *** at shifting. They can shift way faster than probably 95% of drivers with manual transmissions, if not 100%.
I was gonna say. Autos just lose more power to the wheels compared to a manual tranny.
 
  #14  
Old 08-21-2006 | 10:56 PM
CCM's Avatar
CCM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,395
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by 232forme
I was gonna say. Autos just lose more power to the wheels compared to a manual tranny.
True, around 15% compared to 10%. But that is usually only a problem if the manual driver really knows how to hammer through the gears.
 
  #15  
Old 08-22-2006 | 06:50 AM
bassman97's Avatar
blank
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,451
From: North Jersey
Default

If the stock clutch is too stiff and you still want to have the fun that stick provides, consider a hydraulic clutch kit. Also, clutches like the King Cobra reduce the pedal effort so combine the two and it can make the world of difference.
 
  #17  
Old 08-22-2006 | 08:20 AM
bassman97's Avatar
blank
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,451
From: North Jersey
Default

Really? You gotta love false advertising...
 
  #18  
Old 08-22-2006 | 04:09 PM
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

the mach is a much more satisfying iteration of the platform than the GT and it responds really well to even light modding. I'd jump on it in your shoes.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
04DarkShadowGT
Show, Shine, and Tunes!
15
06-29-2007 08:53 AM
Stan
The Lounge
10
06-16-2006 09:46 PM
Stan
The Lounge
6
03-20-2006 10:40 AM
blownstang
Modular 4.6L Tech
3
12-29-2005 10:28 PM
BeatTheBrat94
The Lounge
13
11-15-2005 07:56 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:02 AM.