The Lounge This is the General Talk forum.

blah blah shelby blah blah ..but what about...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-06-2006 | 10:10 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default blah blah shelby blah blah ..but what about...

the saleen mustang. It's Extreme saleen throws down 550 hp from the crank, has completely done bodywork, 6 speed tranny, everything you need. The only thing it doesnt have is the popularity of a cobra. And with what some people are paying over the shelby's msrp(10-20k OVER, which makes about 60 grand fully loaded), why not just get the extreme saleen? Its msrp on the site goes for right around 70 grand. It weighs 400 lbs more than the new z06 and has 50 more hp(and 50 more than the shelby as well). Enough to makeup for the weight difference? It's weight-to-power ratio is verrrry close(just a hair more, and in this ratio, more = not as fast) All my question is, is why are all eyes on the new cobra and how IT is gonna be the vette beater when you alrady got a special edition mustang readily available to the public for a comparable price
 
  #2  
Old 05-06-2006 | 10:14 PM
Lances03SVT's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,684
From: Carthage, Missouri
Default

One word..................................

SHELBY!!!!
 
  #4  
Old 05-06-2006 | 10:23 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
what?

saleen... shelby... they're both special editions... arent they?

where did you see this saleen?
pics? links?

It's at saleen.com You can find info on all the saleen cars. Theres a 400+hp, decked out saleen that goes for $50 grand.

My main pondering was that everyone seems to be waiting on their toes for the new shelby to come out, and when it does, how hard it will be to get ahold of. However, for a little more money, you can very easily get a car that will be a little faster than the shelby, and rarity for both would be about the same.
 
  #5  
Old 05-06-2006 | 10:28 PM
todd03blown's Avatar
Blowns the only way!!!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 788
Default

for value longterm the shelby is going to be tough to beat without question. Modding wise it will be interesting to see how easy it will be to change the pulley etc on the new shelby and see what that motor is capable of handling/producing.
 
  #7  
Old 05-07-2006 | 06:36 AM
madmatt's Avatar
Traitor...lol
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,939
From: Lexington, SC
Default

Personally, I think Saleens are outrageously over priced. Also, the quality is nowhere near what it should be for a 60k dollar car, so ill pass on that. Once the prices on the GT500 level out, there will be a distinct difference.
 
  #8  
Old 05-07-2006 | 07:14 AM
dfroster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 323
From: Jacksonville,FL
Default

It's what Lance said "one word...Shelby". As in," I own a Shelby". I like the Steedas and most of the specs, repeat MOST. Foose, as much as I like his work, could have done better, just my op.
 
  #9  
Old 05-07-2006 | 11:49 AM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

hmm, 3v 4.6 or the 5.4 with gt40 takeoff parts. hmm, tough question.

yeah the shelby hands down. you ever slap a pulley, intake, exhaust, and retune on that car and you will put down 600 at the wheels without a sweat.
 
  #10  
Old 05-07-2006 | 01:24 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by MattJ
hmm, 3v 4.6 or the 5.4 with gt40 takeoff parts. hmm, tough question.

yeah the shelby hands down. you ever slap a pulley, intake, exhaust, and retune on that car and you will put down 600 at the wheels without a sweat.

and you cant swap pulleys on the saleen? Engine size doesnt really matter because the saleen is 550hp/500tq and the shelby is 500hp/470tq(give or take). and who's to say the quality of parts arent as good on the saleen? I'm not on saleen's side, I just wasnt sure why everyone is going crazy over the shelby's power when you got one with even more power already available. True that the price is high, but a comparable viper costs 10 grand more and 50 less hp without even having a backseat. So in comparison to that, its still a good deal.
 
  #12  
Old 05-07-2006 | 02:05 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Good point on the viper though, WTF does dodge plan to do in all of this? I guess most people think "OMG a mustang that can compete with the new Vette z06!" but no one thinks about the viper... poor little guy (510hp 535tq)
 
  #13  
Old 05-07-2006 | 02:42 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
well matt is most certainly correct...

if ya wanna go by performance and potential

a 330 DOHC 4v > 281 SOHC 3v

the saleen is SOHC right?

anyway... that 330 has much more potential...

not to mention the shelby should holds it value better

you cant say the shelby holds its value better. Show me a cobra and I'll show you a comparable saleen of thew same years thats worth the same or more. As for "potential", **** potential. With boost and storng internals, it doesnt matter how small your engine is. Sure, if you throw 15 lbs of boost in each, the 5.4 may have more torque, but tuned well enough, the 4.6 wil perform about the same.
 
  #14  
Old 05-07-2006 | 03:05 PM
CCM's Avatar
CCM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,395
From: Northern Virginia
Default

SVT is always going to be better than Saleen in my book.
 
  #15  
Old 05-07-2006 | 03:49 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Saleen Mustangs are an even worst investment then a GT. Saleen is in real trouble in my opinion. Watch the prices drop on their products at the Shelby hits the showrooms.
 
  #16  
Old 05-07-2006 | 06:35 PM
02LaserRedGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 204
Default

I've said this in MPH and I'll say it here. The bang for the buck factor made the 03/04 Cobras so appealing. But the ridiculous markups will ruin that for the new Shelby.

I personally find the Saleen E to be more appealing. The Shelby has the displacement advantage but BOTH still have the potential to produce "enough" (600+) hp when modded. The Saleen has better brakes, suspension, interior, plus it looks more exotic IMO, and is more rare. Looks are subjective but I think the Saleen is a better overall package, performance-wise.
 
  #18  
Old 05-07-2006 | 07:47 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Which car is "better" is purely subjective. Which car will be a better investment (ie, not loose money as fast)....the Shelby is the clear winner UNLESS you pay too much for it to begin with.
 
  #19  
Old 05-07-2006 | 08:02 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
Which car is "better" is purely subjective. Which car will be a better investment (ie, not loose money as fast)....the Shelby is the clear winner UNLESS you pay too much for it to begin with.

thats point #2 of my discussion. The shelby value at msrp would kill saleen's value. But the markup kills shelby's value. And with some paying $50 grand+ for their shelby, dont expect it to drop to below 30 for quiiiiiiiiite some time.

Ang greg, wtf was so dumb about my statement? You can throw a massive turbo on a 2 liter ricer, turn up the boost, and you'll have more torque than a 5.4 liter. The motto is correct "No replacement for displacement", when you're N/a. But once you go forced induction, anything is fair game. Just bc you're hardcore ford, hardcore shelby, hardcore old school muscle, doesnt mean its necessarily THE best, always and forever.
 
  #20  
Old 05-07-2006 | 08:03 PM
CCM's Avatar
CCM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,395
From: Northern Virginia
Default

What are you talking about Danny, the 4v 5.4 and the 3v 4.6 aren't even in the same league.
 
  #21  
Old 05-07-2006 | 08:09 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by CCM
What are you talking about Danny, the 4v 5.4 and the 3v 4.6 aren't even in the same league.

you're right. When they're n/a the 5.4 kills it. But both the shelby and saleen are supercharged, so anything goes. If you want more power on a 4.6, turn up the boost, upgrade the internals. For the added cost of a 5.4, just slap a s/c on and for the same amount, you have a 4.6 with equal horsepower.
 
  #23  
Old 05-07-2006 | 08:17 PM
CCM's Avatar
CCM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,395
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by dannyb785
you're right. When they're n/a the 5.4 kills it. But both the shelby and saleen are supercharged, so anything goes. If you want more power on a 4.6, turn up the boost, upgrade the internals. For the added cost of a 5.4, just slap a s/c on and for the same amount, you have a 4.6 with equal horsepower.
You're right. You can make a smaller displacement engine faster than a larger displacement engine with enough money. But the point we're all trying to make to you is that if you put the same upgrades on each engine, the 5.4 is ALWAYS going to make more power.
 
  #24  
Old 05-07-2006 | 08:17 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
you could do the same to a v8 and get better performance

You are correct. But ricers cant fit v8's into their civics so they do the next best thing.
 
  #26  
Old 05-07-2006 | 08:22 PM
02LaserRedGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
Which car is "better" is purely subjective. Which car will be a better investment (ie, not loose money as fast)....the Shelby is the clear winner UNLESS you pay too much for it to begin with.
Cars are poor investments, especially Mustangs. I buy a car to drive, not sell.

Stock versus stock, the Saleen E will outhandle, outbrake, and most likely outdrag the Shelby.
 
  #27  
Old 05-07-2006 | 08:42 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by 02LaserRedGT
Cars are poor investments, especially Mustangs. I buy a car to drive, not sell.

Stock versus stock, the Saleen E will outhandle, outbrake, and most likely outdrag the Shelby.

good point. resale value shouldnt be someone's priority when buying a car. Its something some people spend 2 hours a day in so it should be something you enjoy to drive, not something that will giev you the best possible gas mileage while looking like crap. When I pass people with priuses, I always look at them and laugh. Such an ugly, slow car and it costs more than my car, so the money in gas that theyre saving is the money that ive already saved when i bought the car
 
  #28  
Old 05-07-2006 | 09:30 PM
Badfish's Avatar
Listen to reggae.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,698
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Originally Posted by dannyb785
good point. resale value shouldnt be someone's priority when buying a car. Its something some people spend 2 hours a day in so it should be something you enjoy to drive, not something that will giev you the best possible gas mileage while looking like crap. When I pass people with priuses, I always look at them and laugh. Such an ugly, slow car and it costs more than my car, so the money in gas that theyre saving is the money that ive already saved when i bought the car
it depends on people's prioroties...resale is one of the top selling points of cars in this nation, to most car enthusiasts it couldn't matter less...but we're the minority in that case
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trev0006
Videos
0
01-13-2008 01:57 AM
v6ceez
Show, Shine, and Tunes!
5
10-01-2007 06:50 PM
cobra1923
Pictures
17
07-26-2006 06:05 PM
NoKturnaL
Show, Shine, and Tunes!
24
04-06-2006 10:15 AM
PureStang
The Lounge
4
11-10-2005 12:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:19 AM.