I need suspension upgrades bad...
#1
I need suspension upgrades bad...
So as most of you know I love Steeda products a lot.. so what do you think of their Subframe connectors, UCA's, and LCA's? I hear lots of good things about Maximum Motorsports stuff, and as most of you know MT carries both So what are the differences? I've heard the Steeda UCA's and LCA's are very very strong even though they are aluminum, which is suppose to be good cuz they're lighter. Are the MM UCA's and LCA's made out of steel or what? Any advice on this subject would be must appreciated. Do you think there's anything else I could do to get better traction besides a new spline and differential with slicks lol
#2
im running the steeda aluminum upper and lowers and love them. no wheel hop at all and you can tell that the wheels are being shoved into the pavement. mine are non adjustable, but you could do adjustable uppers for a little bit more bite by setting pinion angle.
#4
I like steeda too, but you cant go wrong with either company really. I would get the lowers and subframes. Then get adjustable uppers and set them so the yoke is at -3* this is best for traction out of the hole.
#5
I don't like steeda suspension normally but that's a personal preference. I just don't see the kind of engineering that I'd expect from such a critical component out of steeda that I see from MM.
For the ultimate in traction, there's nothing that comes close to a torque arm. Other than that, you're pretty well limited by the stock suspension's limitations.
Steeda's UCA's and LCA's are pretty comparable to MM in stock type setups. Whatever you do try and get LCA's with spherical bearings at the axle end and either Poly-Urethane or a spherical bearing at the chassis end. You'll get pretty ugly induced bind with Poly at both ends and it's recommended that you avoid that configuration on stock type suspensions. Induced bind causes all kinds of traction issues.
The MM LCA's you want are made from steel and are actually pretty light. I think they're a superior implementation than Steeda but I haven't run steeda arms so I can't speak from personal experience. Aluminum is better for full race than it is for street. Race tracks don't have potholes.
If I were you, I'd get MM and never even consider anything else. Feel free to choose steeda, many peeps are happy with their stuff... just not me.
For the ultimate in traction, there's nothing that comes close to a torque arm. Other than that, you're pretty well limited by the stock suspension's limitations.
Steeda's UCA's and LCA's are pretty comparable to MM in stock type setups. Whatever you do try and get LCA's with spherical bearings at the axle end and either Poly-Urethane or a spherical bearing at the chassis end. You'll get pretty ugly induced bind with Poly at both ends and it's recommended that you avoid that configuration on stock type suspensions. Induced bind causes all kinds of traction issues.
The MM LCA's you want are made from steel and are actually pretty light. I think they're a superior implementation than Steeda but I haven't run steeda arms so I can't speak from personal experience. Aluminum is better for full race than it is for street. Race tracks don't have potholes.
If I were you, I'd get MM and never even consider anything else. Feel free to choose steeda, many peeps are happy with their stuff... just not me.
#6
Originally Posted by csledd
Any advice on this subject would be must appreciated. Do you think there's anything else I could do to get better traction besides a new spline and differential with slicks lol
P.S. csledd, this is not directed to you as a put-down. It's a decision one must make to have a drag type suspension , spend the time at the track to develope your drivign skills or settle for poor track times.
Jay
#11
Originally Posted by Zaff03GT
if you get control arms do u need to have a built rear end
#13
In truth most LCA's are about the same and performance between the various makers doesn't usually vary too wildly (except GMS... never buy GMS). MM and Griggs are a little higher standard than all the rest though. You can see it in the welds and the materials and they actually win races on their own designs.
If you don't weld in subframes you might as well not even have them.
A "built" rear end refers to things like upgraded differentials and axles, and usually includes about a 1000 dollar price tag on just parts. I'm going the less sensible route of a 9" conversion. That usually doubles the cost to start. Neither is required but it sure ain't gunna hurt.
If you don't weld in subframes you might as well not even have them.
A "built" rear end refers to things like upgraded differentials and axles, and usually includes about a 1000 dollar price tag on just parts. I'm going the less sensible route of a 9" conversion. That usually doubles the cost to start. Neither is required but it sure ain't gunna hurt.
#14
I would go with MM lowers, FRPP uppers (this is what MM recommends), and MM full length weld in frame connectors. Also, those of you that had frame connectors welded in, how much did it cost you? Does the carpet need to be pulled? One performance shop is quoting me 4-6 hrs of labor at $82.50hr.
#16
Originally Posted by blownstang
I would go with MM lowers, FRPP uppers (this is what MM recommends), and MM full length weld in frame connectors. Also, those of you that had frame connectors welded in, how much did it cost you? Does the carpet need to be pulled? One performance shop is quoting me 4-6 hrs of labor at $82.50hr.
#18
no it does not. You should not be in the same spot long enough when you weld it where it would be a problem. And if you get subframes you better weld them on as bolting them is does little too help.
#21
subframes should cost from 100-300 installed including the connectors depending on which ones you get. My local fave shop (Apex) usually has griggs or MM subframes for 100-150 installed.
The subframes connect to the frame rails of the car. There is no carpet in contact with any metal that will be welded on normal under-car subframes. The only time you need to pull the carpet is when you do in-floor subframes.
JayC, I think everyone read your post... just noone seems to care. We're all peer pressuring csledd to mod his car more. He'll spend what time he can at the track just like the rest of us. Sometimes extensive practice is the least viable option.
The subframes connect to the frame rails of the car. There is no carpet in contact with any metal that will be welded on normal under-car subframes. The only time you need to pull the carpet is when you do in-floor subframes.
JayC, I think everyone read your post... just noone seems to care. We're all peer pressuring csledd to mod his car more. He'll spend what time he can at the track just like the rest of us. Sometimes extensive practice is the least viable option.
#22
So I'm definately spinning all through my first gear at the track.. so what should I pick up first to help with this? I'm thinking about just doing lowers and then uppers next month when i have some spare cash.. or what should i do first? lol
#24
your car is lowered isn't it? first, put drag springs and shocks on it, loosen the front sway bar when you get to the track, come equipped with a drag oriented tire. Some MM LCA's with the weight jacking feature will help. You'll want to jack up the rear just a bit when you get to the track. Combined with the front sway bar being loosened you'll get much better weight transfer and that should help you hook.
What are your 60' times?
What are your 60' times?
#25
Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
JayC, I think everyone read your post... just noone seems to care. We're all peer pressuring csledd to mod his car more. He'll spend what time he can at the track just like the rest of us. Sometimes extensive practice is the least viable option.
#26
wow.. that's important or not. I don't care if csledd is a eunuch but thanks for the update. It mattered to csledd enough that SHE didn't mention it. I'll be sure to refer to her as a him every time now though just to **** you off.. heheheh
#27
Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
wow.. that's important or not. I don't care if csledd is a eunuch but thanks for the update. It mattered to csledd enough that SHE didn't mention it. I'll be sure to refer to her as a him every time now though just to **** you off.. heheheh