Mac Shorty O/R H-Pipe vs. Mac ProChamber!!
#1
05-24-2006 | 01:18 AM
Thread Starter
|
*Pure*American*Muscle*
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 147
From: Southern California
Mac Shorty O/R H-Pipe vs. Mac ProChamber!!
Mac Shorty O/R H-Pipe vs. Mac ProChamber!!
What is the difference between these two things? Sound, HP, etc??
I want to get my new exhaust really soon but I need to know what to go with my MAC Long Tubes and flowmaster cat back??
What is the difference between these two things? Sound, HP, etc??
I want to get my new exhaust really soon but I need to know what to go with my MAC Long Tubes and flowmaster cat back??
#2
05-24-2006 | 05:49 AM
KenneBell Blown
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,287
From: Kingwood, Tx.
If you go with longtube headers you will need a shorty x or h pipe. I have a x-pipe but I've heard h pipes and I think they have more of that old muscle car sound. I'd go with the shorty off road h-pipe.
#3
05-24-2006 | 10:43 AM
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,103
From: tennessee
the h pipe is alot deeper. the prochamber sounds like an h in the lower rpm but sounds between an x and h at WOT. i have the o/r prochamber with flowmaster catback and it sounds great. would not change it for anything
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
