General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms

Interesting thought on tranny capabilities...

Old Feb 24, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #1  
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default Interesting thought on tranny capabilities...

ok, so apparently my tranny can withhold 360 hp before it starts to go out. Does that mean if my car has 400 peak horsepower that I'd need to think about changing it? Here's the reason for my question...


when you shift into whatever gear, the rpms are lower once you are engaging the clutch and therefore the horsepower is lower. Say my car peaks 400 hp @ 5200, and from 2nd gear to 3rd(shifting @ 5200), the rpms would drop to around 3500 or 4000. However, pretend that my hp @ 3500 rpms is only like, 330 hp(just guessing). Wouldnt that mean that the clutch/tranny is only actually handling 330 hp at the max? Or am I just not thinking right?
 
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #2  
shad0ws's Avatar
I like to whine...
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,640
Default

You really shouldn't be worrying about this because there are tons of people in the 400HP range with the stock trannies and they are still going strong.
 
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 10:11 PM
  #3  
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Never really understood how you can accurately tell how much a Tranny can hold. For instance, with a Performance Automatic Transmission, some say they hold up to 400HP. That seems very low for an aftermarket mostly built tranny.
 
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #4  
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

I'm not worrying for my sake. If anything, what shadowsGT mentioned proves my theory true. So if your car has 400 hp, you have nothing to worry about since the max your clutch/tranny ever feels is about 350
 
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 01:15 AM
  #5  
Icefreezen's Avatar
Mustang Superman
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,907
From: Your mom's bed
Default

I like the theory as your tranny can handle as much as your engine which is 400 hp.......which has been proven true and just makes sense
 
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 02:04 AM
  #6  
caballo's Avatar
Exceptional Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 530
From: NE CO
Default

It's not the HP, it the TQ.

which is the twisting force on the pieces of your tranny that cause it to fail. I haven't seen to many hp ratings on trannies. I've seen TQ ratings, though.

Although it would be very easy to convert the tq rating to a hp rating, problem with that is if you change where you make the hp in the powerband you change the peak torque. However if you go by peak tq rating then it doesn't matter where that peak is in the powerband.

Just my 2 pennies...
 
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 04:21 AM
  #7  
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Problem is people throw out numbers all the time, but you don't know if it is bhp or rwhp.

stock trannies are fine to 500 or so hp. Keep in mind that slicks changes things quite a bit.
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #8  
two-niner's Avatar
twin-engine props
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 38
From: las vegas,nv
Default This thread confirms everything.

WTF? The horsepower in the engine never changes. CABALLO is right on the money. IT's torque.torque. and the torque. The other stuff is called marketing.
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #9  
dannyb785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

Originally Posted by two-niner
WTF? The horsepower in the engine never changes. CABALLO is right on the money. IT's torque.torque. and the torque. The other stuff is called marketing.

ok wtfever. torque..my bad. My point wasnt focused on the hp rating. My point was that even if an engines torque maxes at 400 hp, you shifting and engaging the clutch provides power more around 350. so i was asking if thats why people with 400 hp can keep their stock trannies w/o problem
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #10  
02Stang's Avatar
1fastGT
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 256
From: Wilmington, DE
Default

Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
Problem is people throw out numbers all the time, but you don't know if it is bhp or rwhp.

stock trannies are fine to 500 or so hp. Keep in mind that slicks changes things quite a bit.
I don't think so bud, My tranny was fine before blower and now 4 months later I have no third gear. so 500hp before they go!!! why be cheap buy an upgrade like i am.
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #11  
dom's Avatar
dom
whos gonna ban me next?
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,268
From: baltimore, MD
Default

500rwtq stock auto trans goes low 11s on slicks
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 06:06 PM
  #12  
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,974
From: Orlando,Florida
Default

it can hold 360ftlbs not Hp. And the 3650 has a mostly good background. Alot of people like it and think its good for a mild or not to crazy car. Some people like 02stang dont liek them and they died on them. At the some token i know of many guys on modular depot who are pushing close to or a bit over 400rwhp and using stock trannys for a good amount of time now. Me i would only replace once it dies.
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 06:12 PM
  #13  
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Quick question, about stock auto's.

If you installed a new valvebody and a stall convertor along with a tranny cooler. Would this help hold more HP or is there a lot more to it?

Say you went one step further and installed all new Alto Red Clutches, would this constitute a pretty good tranny re-build?
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #14  
dom's Avatar
dom
whos gonna ban me next?
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,268
From: baltimore, MD
Default

valvetrain?
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #15  
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Edit: Valvebody
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #16  
dom's Avatar
dom
whos gonna ban me next?
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,268
From: baltimore, MD
Default

the only way youd need to upgrade clutches are if you want to run a transbrake u gotta add a reverse clutch. just get a valvebody, cooler, and a deep sump pan. a converter will be a stronger converter but it will create more heat.
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 08:48 PM
  #17  
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,974
From: Orlando,Florida
Default

The valve body,cooler,and deep pan will make it last longer and not slip. So in a sense yeah it will hold more power. The main thing which i cant stress enough to my freinds who drive auto's is to change there tranny fluide alot. If you drive your car hard change it every 25k or less miles. Even though the manual says you can go 60-80k on the fluide dont its the life blood of your tranny change it alot. Keeping it clean will make it last along time. Anyone who has delt with autos alot knows what i mean.
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #18  
dom's Avatar
dom
whos gonna ban me next?
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,268
From: baltimore, MD
Default

i thought the manual says 30k. i do mine every 10
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #19  
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

horsepower sells cars. torque wins races.

a lot of people seem to forget that.
 
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 06:57 AM
  #20  
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,974
From: Orlando,Florida
Default

Originally Posted by dom
i thought the manual says 30k. i do mine every 10
I was going off what my f150 manual said. they didnt want you to change the fluide till 60-80k miles which is nuts. But yeah you really gotta change the tranny fluide in an auto alot to keep it alive, like dom does even though i think thats a bit soon but i would rather change it alot then change the tranny out alot.
 
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 07:53 AM
  #21  
dom's Avatar
dom
whos gonna ban me next?
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,268
From: baltimore, MD
Default

well 10k for me is different than 10k for most people. for a daily driver car you rack up 10k consisting of lots of easy driving and highway. 10k for me takes a long time as i do not drive my car a lot especially in the winter so my mileage consists of much more racing. in the colder months the only time i bring my car out is if i have a race .
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WNRacing
Videos
3
Jul 22, 2009 04:25 PM
PureStang
The Lounge
7
Apr 23, 2008 04:02 PM
whitethunder46
The Lounge
9
Dec 8, 2006 05:31 AM
customstang
General Tech Forum
3
Apr 18, 2006 01:31 PM
Chopper
Modular 4.6L Tech
8
Mar 12, 2005 04:09 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:41 AM.