Dyno Results Post your actual dyono results here for all to view.

Dyno #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-18-2005 | 02:40 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default Dyno #'s

Pick up the car today. Nitrous #'s look good and are where I want them. What do you guys think about the NA #'s? I think the stock heads and intake are restricting it a lot.

http://www.mustangmods.com/data/12294/dyno_graph.jpg
 
  #2  
Old 04-18-2005 | 06:15 PM
madmatt's Avatar
Traitor...lol
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,939
From: Lexington, SC
Default

HOLY JEEBUS!!!! That torque is SICK, what shot is that with. Also, the N/A numbers seem really low, but maybe the auto is sucking part of it away. I was almost sure youd hit 280 with what you have. Those nitrous numbers though, holy cow, hows the hit?
 
  #3  
Old 04-18-2005 | 08:57 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Yeah, the a/f on the NA run is pretty rich. My STD #'s are 270rwhp and 290 rwtq though.

http://www.mustangmods.com/data/12294/dyno_graph_2.jpg
 
  #4  
Old 04-19-2005 | 07:08 AM
madmatt's Avatar
Traitor...lol
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,939
From: Lexington, SC
Default

Awesome, why didnt they lean it out a little then?
 
  #5  
Old 04-19-2005 | 12:51 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Not sure. I wasnt there while they were tuning it. But richer is safer then leaner so maybe thats why?
 
  #6  
Old 04-19-2005 | 02:44 PM
dannyb785's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
Default

HOLY JEEBUS!!!! That torque is SICK
thats funy bc b4 i read that and saw the graph I was like 'holy moses!"
 
  #7  
Old 04-19-2005 | 08:14 PM
madmatt's Avatar
Traitor...lol
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,939
From: Lexington, SC
Default

LOL, AMEN then I guess.
 
  #8  
Old 04-21-2005 | 07:42 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Originally Posted by madmatt
LOL, AMEN then I guess.
:headbang:
 
  #9  
Old 04-22-2005 | 03:28 PM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 868
From: St. Louis
Default

Dan what all do you have done to the car power wise? I can't get to your web site say's you have used up your bandwidth for the month. List your mods in your signature you butthead.
 
  #10  
Old 04-23-2005 | 08:56 AM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Haha, yeah the site is down. Itll be back on the 25 though. Link to my mods is now in the sig.
 
  #11  
Old 04-23-2005 | 09:18 AM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 868
From: St. Louis
Default

Dan those n/a numbers look about right to me. You should hit 12.7's or so when you run it. I'd guess 11.7's on the juice. There might be another 5 hp in the n/a tune with some tweaking.
 
  #12  
Old 04-23-2005 | 03:27 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

I dont know man, comparing our cars, my #'s look kind of week. Id like to be around 280rwhp STD.
 
  #13  
Old 04-26-2005 | 08:28 PM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 868
From: St. Louis
Default

Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
I dont know man, comparing our cars, my #'s look kind of week. Id like to be around 280rwhp STD.
You have about the same set up as mine except the cams which should add 20-25 rwhp and no torque so really it's about right. I have pullies and I did not see that on your list so theres 4-5 rwhp that makes it about 25 difference which equals the cams.
 
  #14  
Old 04-28-2005 | 09:28 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Originally Posted by Blue02GT
You have about the same set up as mine except the cams which should add 20-25 rwhp and no torque so really it's about right. I have pullies and I did not see that on your list so theres 4-5 rwhp that makes it about 25 difference which equals the cams.
Hmmm, your right. For some reason I thought you put out more then 250rwhp SAE. Im going to the track next Sat. Im hoping to run around a 12.5 or so. What kind of weight reduction did you have with the 12.8?
 
  #15  
Old 04-29-2005 | 03:44 PM
Samsstang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 383
From: Colorado
Default

Those are awesome #s you should have no problem running 12s
 
  #16  
Old 05-02-2005 | 12:16 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Im planning on running 12's NA and 11's with the 100 shot.
 
  #17  
Old 05-02-2005 | 02:12 PM
TayWolf55's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 597
From: Ozark, MO
Default

Gotta love all that torque with the nitrous. Nice numbers.
 
  #18  
Old 05-03-2005 | 12:02 PM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 868
From: St. Louis
Default

Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
Hmmm, your right. For some reason I thought you put out more then 250rwhp SAE. Im going to the track next Sat. Im hoping to run around a 12.5 or so. What kind of weight reduction did you have with the 12.8?
Pulled the rear seat, spare and jack. Dog bone removed along with the front sway bar. Removed loose change from coin holder and had a colonic.
 
  #19  
Old 12-28-2005 | 10:14 AM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

UPDATE: First off, Dean (Blue02GT) was right on the moeny with the 1/4 mile guess of 12.7. I ran a 12.76@ 107.6mph with a 1.8 60'. However, Im having problems with my converter and the 2-3 shift. So Ill be getting a new tune by Ed Clark on March 8th. Im hoping to run my 12.5 or better with the new tune and some new mods. And I will be spraying this summer and hoping to run low 11's. Ill post the dyno sheet when I get back from Steen.
 
  #20  
Old 12-29-2005 | 10:11 PM
whitethunder46's Avatar
Always Detailin'
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,556
From: Dayton, OH
Default

What do you think I would run with 260RWHP, 295RWTQ. Auto tranny with 3200 stall, 4.10 gears, stock suspension. All on custom dyno tune. Also on street tires, but pretty sticky ones. I'm hoping for below 13.50 constantly.
 
  #21  
Old 01-07-2006 | 11:10 AM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

I think you can hit 13.5 with some weight reduction, good weather, and good traction.
 
  #22  
Old 01-11-2006 | 10:05 AM
procs2v's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 88
From: clinton, md
Default

that's about the same as mine. I have not sprayed it yet at the track because i don't have any dr yet. The n/a time is very good. I hope to just get in the 12's on motor. I don't thank i can go 11's on spray maybe 12.20's. Where are guy getting all of this mph from when on motor. I have only had 102. on motor. But I have no weight reduction. People told me to get pulleys, they did nothing for me.
 
  #23  
Old 01-11-2006 | 10:11 AM
procs2v's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 88
From: clinton, md
Default

I did not see that you had cams. Now I see how you go that fast. Still good numbers
 
  #24  
Old 01-17-2006 | 08:58 PM
Stangdude27's Avatar
Silver 2003 GT Conv
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 399
From: Ft Walton Beach,Florida
Default

Good numbers I think now I should be closer to 11's but will have to wait for the track to open up. Anyway good job.
 
  #25  
Old 01-23-2006 | 10:45 PM
pimpmustangGT's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 191
Default

man you got the power to get into the 11's... well into the 11's ideally - i assume ur running slicks with ur control arms - do they Fudge up your daily ride? (curious) - anyway - maybe hte auto is holdin u down - jet it up to a 125 - 150 and ull be right!
 
  #26  
Old 02-12-2006 | 10:35 AM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Originally Posted by pimpmustangGT
man you got the power to get into the 11's... well into the 11's ideally - i assume ur running slicks with ur control arms - do they Fudge up your daily ride? (curious) - anyway - maybe hte auto is holdin u down - jet it up to a 125 - 150 and ull be right!
Im running ET streets on my draglites, so I have two sets of rims. The auto isnt holding me down at all, Id prefer auto over 5 speed any day. I havent sprayed yet. Ill be mid low 11's with a 100 shot, no need to go up to 125- 150 shot unles I want to blow my motor.
 
  #27  
Old 02-15-2006 | 04:17 PM
Samsstang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 383
From: Colorado
Default

You guys TQ#s are awesome most Ive gotten out of mine was 460sftlb. Iam getting ready to install my new injectors this weekend and get a new tune hopefully with abit more fuel i can get in the 500ftlbs?
 
  #28  
Old 02-17-2006 | 06:55 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

Unles your a/f is really screwed up right now then I doubt youll hit 500ft lbs. NX makes better #'s then venom, and my stage 2 cams help out a bunch.
 
  #29  
Old 02-24-2006 | 12:56 PM
Samsstang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 383
From: Colorado
Default

I believe it's in your cams! Cause procs2V is putting out above 500ftlbs. according to his sig. in my case, my injectors are maxed out! iam still using my stock 19lbs.
 
  #30  
Old 02-24-2006 | 05:08 PM
03gtmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,440
From: Northern Va
Default

I have some BRAND NEW 30lbs injectors that I got from here if you want them. I sent you a PM.
 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:47 PM.