Drag Racing! Discussions on drag racing, using the tree and techniques for improving your performance at the track

New Honda Si (Fast as hell)!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-24-2006 | 01:30 PM
BraggStang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 224
  #3  
Old 06-24-2006 | 02:58 PM
Ghostalker's Avatar
BOLO 4 ME
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,576
From: Danbury, CT
Default

That was hilarious.
Awesome editing and ddirecting, anda nice compilation of low 17 secnd/ high 16 second cars.
I would kill myself if i lost to a stock neon.
 
  #4  
Old 06-24-2006 | 03:04 PM
BrentK's Avatar
Win it or wreck it
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,303
From: My Heart is in Ohio
Default

wow
 
  #5  
Old 06-24-2006 | 03:44 PM
Nofire's Avatar
Sooner #65
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 755
From: University of Oklahoma
Default

That thing wasn't stock and you could still time it's 1320 with a sundial.
 
  #6  
Old 06-24-2006 | 03:49 PM
YoshiBluedevil's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 140
From: Silver Spring, MD
Default

thats not a "new" Si, its like an 04 and back, with the 1.6L 160 hp 0tq motor lol. plus, he lost more tq with a CAI and exhaust.
 
  #7  
Old 06-24-2006 | 03:56 PM
BraggStang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by YoshiBluedevil
thats not a "new" Si, its like an 04 and back, with the 1.6L 160 hp 0tq motor lol. plus, he lost more tq with a CAI and exhaust.

Its a joke!!!! I know its not a New Si. The new ones are "SLOWER" LOL!!!!
 
  #8  
Old 06-24-2006 | 04:50 PM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,974
From: Orlando,Florida
Default

Wtf is the point of this video?
 
  #9  
Old 06-24-2006 | 04:58 PM
TClark22's Avatar
Blown 2V
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,297
From: kansas
Default

complete waste of my time...
 
  #10  
Old 06-25-2006 | 12:16 PM
jeredan2003's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,787
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Default

What a GREAT Video of some slow cars!
 
  #11  
Old 06-25-2006 | 12:58 PM
cuban3jumper's Avatar
Your local V6 Guy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 841
Default

My sixer kills those and the newer ones on the highway, where everyone has an advantage on the v6 stang lol. Don't even talk about from a dig. But the two door si's before the body style in this vid aren't slouches especially with some mods.
 
  #12  
Old 06-25-2006 | 05:51 PM
GREG@SN95's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
Default

uh...

wtf was that...

that ****in thing was slow as hell...

why the hell did you even post that?:ban: :wrongforu :loser: :censored:
 
  #13  
Old 06-26-2006 | 06:48 PM
TMan21's Avatar
I Eat Rice
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Attempt I: Failure
Bad Launch

Yeah, you know with that much raw power at your fingertips launching can be a b!tch :wallbash:
 
  #14  
Old 06-26-2006 | 08:46 PM
stang00's Avatar
Civic
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,577
From: brewster ny
Default

ima get a vid of my sweet civic running it against a neon and ill pwn him hahaa
 
  #15  
Old 06-27-2006 | 10:06 AM
Blk02stang's Avatar
I 8urvtec!!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 815
From: Va
Default

posting a vid of a slow si like that is a waste of time, they only have 153hp at the wheels!! the NEW '06 si's will run side by side with a stock gt! I've watched one with a girl driving it run 9.2's in the 1/8 non stop and it had 30day tags!! My buddy and I are tuning on his Civic HB tommorow evening and maybe if it's not a 4am thing again i'll post some vids of it out on the street.....who says 600FWhp isnt much?? 6.90's in the 1/8 just on wastegate 17psi.
 
  #16  
Old 06-27-2006 | 11:06 AM
cuban3jumper's Avatar
Your local V6 Guy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 841
Default

Originally Posted by Blk02stang
posting a vid of a slow si like that is a waste of time, they only have 153hp at the wheels!! the NEW '06 si's will run side by side with a stock gt! I've watched one with a girl driving it run 9.2's in the 1/8 non stop and it had 30day tags!! My buddy and I are tuning on his Civic HB tommorow evening and maybe if it's not a 4am thing again i'll post some vids of it out on the street.....who says 600FWhp isnt much?? 6.90's in the 1/8 just on wastegate 17psi.

??? I beat an 06 Si. So that must mean I'm faster then a GT? Something was wrong there. and 9.2 in the 1/8, no GT should be running in the 9's with a decent driver.
 
  #17  
Old 06-27-2006 | 11:14 AM
Blk02stang's Avatar
I 8urvtec!!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 815
From: Va
Default

Cuban, are you sure it was an Si? you can do factory upgrades and have a LX or EX that looks identical to the Si but under the hood they are different. Either that or the kid didnt know how to drive it! I've seen countless STOCK mustangs running 9.0-9.4's. When i say stock i mean everything as it comes from the factory.
 
  #18  
Old 06-27-2006 | 12:41 PM
cuban3jumper's Avatar
Your local V6 Guy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 841
Default

Originally Posted by Blk02stang
Cuban, are you sure it was an Si? you can do factory upgrades and have a LX or EX that looks identical to the Si but under the hood they are different. Either that or the kid didnt know how to drive it! I've seen countless STOCK mustangs running 9.0-9.4's. When i say stock i mean everything as it comes from the factory.

No it was an Si. I was not impressed ever since they went to the stupid hatch back and now this body style the si has been on a downward slope. Remember the two door coupe si's? Those were the fasts ones yet that I have seen in real life. As far as stock GT's go all the GT's in my club run around 8.9-9.0 I haven't seen an 1/8 that high from a GT yet from a good driver atleast...
 
  #19  
Old 06-27-2006 | 12:51 PM
Blk02stang's Avatar
I 8urvtec!!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 815
From: Va
Default

You are right about the looks the 99-00 was the best looking, but power wise, hands down the '06 will stomp the 99-00's. #1 the 99-00's had a 160hp b16a which yea at the time was a good setup rather than the little SOHC the others came with, now they have the powerhouse k20a, which is nasty when modded properly and tuned. Where any of the mustangs in your club on a regular radial or a drag tire? I went 9.0 on motor and with just exhaust and tire.
 
  #20  
Old 06-27-2006 | 01:11 PM
cuban3jumper's Avatar
Your local V6 Guy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 841
Default

Originally Posted by Blk02stang
You are right about the looks the 99-00 was the best looking, but power wise, hands down the '06 will stomp the 99-00's. #1 the 99-00's had a 160hp b16a which yea at the time was a good setup rather than the little SOHC the others came with, now they have the powerhouse k20a, which is nasty when modded properly and tuned. Where any of the mustangs in your club on a regular radial or a drag tire? I went 9.0 on motor and with just exhaust and tire.

Radial on a pretty crappy track.
 
  #21  
Old 06-27-2006 | 02:29 PM
Grimmz's Avatar
Jack Touched Me...I Cried
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,751
From: Tallahassee, FL/ Gaithersburg, MD
Default

Originally Posted by spike_africa
Wtf is the point of this video?
My question exactly, I saw this video awhile ago and wanted my life back... jesus why waste that video talent on ****ty cars...
 
  #22  
Old 06-27-2006 | 07:44 PM
Saleen S330's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 900
From: Sumter, SC
Default

I remember going to the track awhile back and a civic just like that asked my friend to race, and he had a 04V6 with drop in K&N, his stang ran high 15's and the civic ran high 17's....and when he asked, he asked like it was going to be something fast......what a f@g.

Also heading to the track to see what kind of better times me and twin turbo 330 can get.....we'll post the outcome....
 
  #23  
Old 07-09-2006 | 07:47 AM
crimson_red_stang's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12
Default

here is a vid of my Si. Best 1/4 mile is a 13.7@108. This was on stock non performance tires. First runs ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uO3wSxOyk4
 
  #24  
Old 07-09-2006 | 08:57 AM
04DarkShadowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,095
From: Ft Wayne, IN
Default

That wasnt the new SI, that was the 02-04 SI, those where slower stock than the 99-00 SIs where. The 02-04 where high 15 low 16 cars.

Originally Posted by cuban3jumper
??? I beat an 06 Si. So that must mean I'm faster then a GT? Something was wrong there. and 9.2 in the 1/8, no GT should be running in the 9's with a decent driver.
You didnt beat the SI, you beat the driver. The 06 SI should be able to beat a V6 stang quite easily. Its considerably lighter and has more hp. A stock 04 V6 stang is what 15.0 - 15.5 range right? A well driven 06 SI should be in the high 14s with ease.
 
  #25  
Old 07-09-2006 | 09:57 AM
PColav6's Avatar
FYL.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,493
From: Pensacola, Florida
Default

Guys, why are we arguing over ****ty civics? With ****ty drivers none the less (Bad launch, 3rd gear mess up,please...get an auto idiot) sad :bash:
 
  #26  
Old 07-09-2006 | 11:11 AM
GREG@SN95's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,135
From: JACKSON NJ
Default

why is this thread here?

could a mod maybe delete it so its gone?

that kid posted it... and hasn't been back since... The video sucks... wtf... Am I the only person that doesn't understand what the hell the point of any of this thread is?
 
  #27  
Old 07-09-2006 | 12:13 PM
BrentK's Avatar
Win it or wreck it
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,303
From: My Heart is in Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by GREG@SN95
why is this thread here?

could a mod maybe delete it so its gone?

that kid posted it... and hasn't been back since... The video sucks... wtf... Am I the only person that doesn't understand what the hell the point of any of this thread is?
:stupid: ...this thread sucks:yawn:
 
  #28  
Old 07-09-2006 | 05:04 PM
jeredan2003's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,787
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Blk02stang
posting a vid of a slow si like that is a waste of time, they only have 153hp at the wheels!! the NEW '06 si's will run side by side with a stock gt! I've watched one with a girl driving it run 9.2's in the 1/8 non stop and it had 30day tags!! My buddy and I are tuning on his Civic HB tommorow evening and maybe if it's not a 4am thing again i'll post some vids of it out on the street.....who says 600FWhp isnt much?? 6.90's in the 1/8 just on wastegate 17psi.
Yea I ran a new 06 civic Si and it was pretty much door to door with me maybe pulling a fender. It was only like a 2nd gear race so it wasnt much, but the civic was still fast. He said it had intake, full exhaust, tuning, and nitrous. He wasnt spraying and I wasnt either. I asked him what size shot he had, and he said 50hp. I told him I had a 100 shot on mine and he stopped smiling for some odd reason.....
 
  #29  
Old 07-09-2006 | 05:20 PM
cuban3jumper's Avatar
Your local V6 Guy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 841
Default

Originally Posted by 04DarkShadowGT
That wasnt the new SI, that was the 02-04 SI, those where slower stock than the 99-00 SIs where. The 02-04 where high 15 low 16 cars.



You didnt beat the SI, you beat the driver. The 06 SI should be able to beat a V6 stang quite easily. Its considerably lighter and has more hp. A stock 04 V6 stang is what 15.0 - 15.5 range right? A well driven 06 SI should be in the high 14s with ease.

I'm not stock sweety
 
  #30  
Old 07-09-2006 | 06:03 PM
stang00's Avatar
Civic
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,577
From: brewster ny
Default

yayy for cuban the only fast auto v6 on the boards but who forgets to out it in drive and goes backward shehehe
 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:51 AM.