Mustang Forums

Go Back   Mustang Forums > Mustang Madness > V6 Tech Forums

V6 Tech Forums For all your 3.8L and 4.0L needs!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2006, 01:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
the gillz
OG, double OG, tripleOG
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 271
Default Corvette rear-ends

I read in a MMFF article that the LS1 corvettes come stock with a 7.5 rear. This seems small for the power they put out. Is this true, if so is it possible that the 7.5 is a V6 stang can handle some serious power? If not then what are the main differences.
the gillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 05:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
mustangvsix
4 point 6
 
mustangvsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Flagstaff, Az / Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 2,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the gillz View Post
I read in a MMFF article that the LS1 corvettes come stock with a 7.5 rear. This seems small for the power they put out. Is this true, if so is it possible that the 7.5 is a V6 stang can handle some serious power? If not then what are the main differences.
i don't know about the vette, but i beleive the 7.5 on our V6's is good to a max of 250hp~.I have heard #'s up to 300 but i mean the GT came with 250hp(flywheel) stock and they upgraded the rear, so i would imagine you wouldn't want to stress it too much more then 250hp.
__________________
2001 True Blue Cobra Convertible
1 of 292
#935 built on 4/20/01
mustangvsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
dhuskers_11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 149
Default

i thought they were good to 350?
dhuskers_11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
mustangvsix
4 point 6
 
mustangvsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Flagstaff, Az / Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 2,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhuskers_11 View Post
i thought they were good to 350?
i'm not 100% sure, but their has got to be a reason that ford didn't want to put the 7.5 in the GT's. i really wouldn't build a V6 and try and run 350hp thru the stock rear.
__________________
2001 True Blue Cobra Convertible
1 of 292
#935 built on 4/20/01
mustangvsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
dhuskers_11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 149
Default

even if you put in new gears, a detroit true trac, and a girdle?
dhuskers_11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 09:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
cuban3jumper
Your local V6 Guy
 
cuban3jumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhuskers_11 View Post
even if you put in new gears, a detroit true trac, and a girdle?
You're talking about a totally different rear end now LOL. Oh and trust me for some reason chevy stock performance parts shit on fords...
__________________

2007 Big West Men's and Women's Champions
Personal bests: Long jump 7.57, triple jump 15.92
cuban3jumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 10:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
MattJ
Senior Member
 
MattJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 10,243
Send a message via AIM to MattJ
Default

irrelevant comparison. the v6 is not for power so why stick extra money into the rear end and make it strong? that would be throwing money out the window for no reason. Besides... the corvette doesnt use a live axle setup, it has a Dana IRS setup which blows the cobra irs out of the water.
MattJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 11:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
GREG@SN95
Banned
 
GREG@SN95's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: JACKSON NJ
Posts: 4,135
Send a message via AIM to GREG@SN95 Send a message via Yahoo to GREG@SN95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattJ View Post
irrelevant comparison. the v6 is not for power so why stick extra money into the rear end and make it strong? that would be throwing money out the window for no reason. Besides... the corvette doesnt use a live axle setup, it has a Dana IRS setup which blows the cobra irs out of the water.
+1

completely different rear...

vette = IRS

vettes leave no room for anything... GM kept it lightwieght and used a smaller rear... and so it would fit...

you are comparing two completey different cars...

its like comparing your left shoe to your left testicle
GREG@SN95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2006, 10:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
r3dn3ck
Wowbagger hates me too!
 
r3dn3ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 7,015
Default

+2 to that. the inch size is only a measurement of the ring gear diameter. It's not a measurement of strength.

The vette IRS is a neat thing. The car was built around it, instead of the IRS being built around the car like the IRS cobras. If you want to beat on a ford live axle, then build up a 8.8, or upgrade all the way to the nearly unbreakable Ford 9".
r3dn3ck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wondering??? 83ponygt General Tech Forum 2 09-07-2006 04:43 PM
My my my...my my my... Slither The Lounge 19 09-03-2006 02:35 AM
Fun Day Sunday! OSW sk84life V6 Tech Forums 3 04-25-2006 02:59 PM
gt exhaust Steeda21 V6 Tech Forums 1 10-10-2005 07:44 PM
Is this even worth it? purpledoggy Show, Shine, and Tunes! 12 08-24-2005 05:33 AM



Ad Management by RedTyger

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48