![]() |
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
||||||
| Suspension Talk Got a suspension part question? Post it here. |
| View Poll Results: H&R SS or Eibach Pros | |||
| H&R SS's |
|
5 | 62.50% |
| Eibach Pro's |
|
3 | 37.50% |
| Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Wuhhhh PAHHHH
|
Which would you all prefer?
__________________
2000 Mustang GT Terminator Front Bumper BBK O/R H Pipe K/N Air Filter 99 Wing Relocation |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,808
|
H&R SS Springs. look at this thread i poasted pics in.
http://mustangboards.com/suspension-...tml#post347788 i also suggest Shocks, Struts, and C/C Plates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Wants a mach..
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 4,949
|
Eibach's are the look of SS's without the stiff performance.
If you want the look and don't want to sacrifice spring softness, eibach, if you want the look and stiffness of springs go with the SS's
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 437
|
I got the pro kit.... I love mine 100%
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
blank
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,689
|
Go w/ the H&R's. I had the pro-kit and the springs from the pro-kit were softer than the springs from the Mach 1/Bullitt (I have the FRPP handling Pack now) so even though my car was lower w/ the pro-kit, my car handles much better now. Go w/ the H&Rs since personally, lowering a car for looks is like buying a cam just for the sound.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|