me vs s2000

01-06-2006, 05:42 AM

rather funny...

Engine Type--- In-Line 4-Cylinder

Engine Block/Cylinder Head --- Aluminum-Alloy

Displacement (cc)-- 2157 (2.2L)

Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net, Rev 8/04)*----237 @ 7800

Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) --162 @ 6800

06 s2000 specs...

__________________________________________________ ____

I swear... it didnt even have the plates yet... A fellow in his mid 30's was drivin it... it came up from behind and we just happened to stop in the neighboring lane...

He looks at me... gives me that look... thinkin he's hot stuff... :loser:

I rev my engine... VRUMMMM... ya kno to let him know that it aint no v-6

but i was a lil worried... that light ass car makes 237 horse w/ an aluminum block so its LIGHT!

i might make close to that but am quite heavier...

WELL

light turned green...

Wow that little turd was quick...

until my tires stopped spinnin...

that was the last i saw of the fellow...

01-06-2006, 05:46 AM

just 4 laughs

FritoBandito · 01-06-2006, 10:37 AM

Street racing is illegal

Sorry, had to beat 4.6 Love to it.

floppy · 01-06-2006, 10:39 AM

so is taking off your cats...

*4.6 Love* · 01-06-2006, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FritoBandito

Street racing is illegal

Sorry, had to beat 4.6 Love to it.

I hate fat girlz · 01-08-2006, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4.6 Love

how the fukc did you lose to a fukcing POS s2000. i used to beat those all day with a bone stock gt...maybe you need to practice driving. even if you lost, you shouldn't have lost that bad. you have almost twice the torque. :wallbash:

01-08-2006, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I hate fat girlz

how the fukc did you lose to a fukcing POS s2000. i used to beat those all day with a bone stock gt...maybe you need to practice driving. even if you lost, you shouldn't have lost that bad. you have almost twice the torque. :wallbash:

you're a ****in moron... i blew the doors off the thing... w/ a bad clutch at that... learn how to read

Badfish · 01-08-2006, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I hate fat girlz

how the fukc did you lose to a fukcing POS s2000. i used to beat those all day with a bone stock gt...maybe you need to practice driving. even if you lost, you shouldn't have lost that bad. you have almost twice the torque. :wallbash:

read it again retard

I hate fat girlz · 01-08-2006, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpringsStang

read it again retard

tanx god

MattJ · 01-08-2006, 12:36 PM

My buddy has an s2000, and even before my gears id eat him alive. gears were put in and its a whole different story...

dannyb785 · 01-08-2006, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT

WELL

light turned green...

Wow that little turd was quick...

until my tires stopped spinnin...

that was the last i saw of the fellow...

ya know...he's still not 100% clear if he won or lost. Everything he said could be interpreted that he lost..or won

Badfish · 01-08-2006, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannyb785

ya know...he's still not 100% clear if he won or lost. Everything he said could be interpreted that he lost..or won

yeah...if your an idiot

01-08-2006, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannyb785

ya know...he's still not 100% clear if he won or lost. Everything he said could be interpreted that he lost..or won

ok... i'll give ya that... but read it...
he was quick... til my wheels stop spinnin... the thing lanched... i on the other hand sat there with my wheels spinnin... when they stopped, i was like a rocket and blew passed... he he :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

Icefreezen · 01-08-2006, 03:34 PM

I dont waste my time on those S2000 unless he's got something serious

dannyb785 · 01-08-2006, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpringsStang

yeah...if your an idiot

right....I rest my case

floppy · 01-08-2006, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannyb785

right....I rest my case

haha... nice.

Badfish · 01-08-2006, 05:47 PM

oh god how could i have spelled you're wrong?!!?!? thats much worse than being unable to comprehend 5 sentences my 7 year old brother could understand!

01-08-2006, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floppy

so is taking off your cats...

BWAHAHAH this gave me a good laugh

mac0021 · 01-08-2006, 06:23 PM

The S2000s are almost as fast as the 99-04 gts....

CCM · 01-08-2006, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mac0021

The S2000s are almost as fast as the 99-04 gts....

Apparently not.

mac0021 · 01-08-2006, 06:46 PM

My friend has an 01 stock ran 14.1....

That guy probably wasnt trying or he didnt know how to drive....

And a 94-95 gt runs what 15.2 stock???? My money would be on the s2000 if greg only has the mods in his car domain site and the guy could drive.

csledd · 01-08-2006, 07:41 PM

I'm sorry but I have more respect for S2000's than most.. mostly because my friend owns this..

1 BAD S · 01-08-2006, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by csledd

I'm sorry but I have more respect for S2000's than most.. mostly because my friend owns this..

Im with ya. before i got my 03 gt i drove a yellow 01 s2000 that my dad bought me.the dude prolly cant drive at all. the s2000 is such a high reving engine that you have to rev it up to about 5 grand then dump the clutch. most of the time people in the s2000 just spin there tires all day long when they try to launch. My S was stock and my friend had a camaro SS and i was hangin with him till we hit about 120 then his ram air kicked in and he pulled away a little. im not sure how some people are sayin they smoked s2000's mine had 240hp in just a 4 banger. the thing's a fuggin rocket. fastest they ever got a S 1/4 was either 13.5 or 13.6 i cant remember, 0-60 was 4.5. but for a stock 4 banger thats awesome. so ive got to back the s2000 it was just an awesome car. a real head turner. the car didnt even start to red line till 9 grand. also 50/50 weight distribution. dont get me wrong, i love my stang. but i would take the s2000 hands down. had to sell the little fellow cuz of 9/11. pops flew for Delta.

pimpmustangGT · 01-08-2006, 11:20 PM

actullay an s200o is reall not even close... gts arre about 1 to .5 quicker to 60 and 1-2sec quicker in the quarter so no its that close

pimpmustangGT · 01-08-2006, 11:22 PM

your a fuc king lair... an s200o is nowhere close to 4.5 to 60 - jesus... some people make up the dumbest shi t

01-06-2006, 05:42 AM	#1 (permalink)
GREG@94GT Posts: n/a	me vs s2000 rather funny... Engine Type--- In-Line 4-Cylinder Engine Block/Cylinder Head --- Aluminum-Alloy Displacement (cc)-- 2157 (2.2L) Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net, Rev 8/04)*----237 @ 7800 Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) --162 @ 6800 06 s2000 specs... __________________________________________________ ____ I swear... it didnt even have the plates yet... A fellow in his mid 30's was drivin it... it came up from behind and we just happened to stop in the neighboring lane... He looks at me... gives me that look... thinkin he's hot stuff... :loser: I rev my engine... VRUMMMM... ya kno to let him know that it aint no v-6 but i was a lil worried... that light ass car makes 237 horse w/ an aluminum block so its LIGHT! i might make close to that but am quite heavier... WELL light turned green... Wow that little turd was quick... until my tires stopped spinnin... that was the last i saw of the fellow...

01-06-2006, 10:37 AM	#3 (permalink)
FritoBandito Married. Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: OK Posts: 1,234	Street racing is illegal Sorry, had to beat 4.6 Love to it. __________________ 2004 OXFORD GT Parts that matter:K&N,O/R-H,Flow 40's,Xcal2,FRPP 4.10s, Bullitt Susp. kit

01-06-2006, 10:39 AM	#4 (permalink)
floppy Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: royal palm beach, florida Posts: 1,809	so is taking off your cats... __________________ -Floppy Check out www.MustangGenerations.com

01-08-2006, 12:36 PM	#10 (permalink)
MattJ Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Racine, WI Posts: 10,243	My buddy has an s2000, and even before my gears id eat him alive. gears were put in and its a whole different story... __________________ 2001 Mustang GT Premium - Mineral Grey

01-08-2006, 03:34 PM	#14 (permalink)
Icefreezen Mustang Superman Join Date: May 2005 Location: Your mom's bed Posts: 3,908	I dont waste my time on those S2000 unless he's got something serious __________________

01-06-2006, 05:46 AM	#2 (permalink)
GREG@94GT Posts: n/a	just 4 laughs

01-08-2006, 05:47 PM	#17 (permalink)
Badfish Listen to reggae. Join Date: May 2005 Location: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 8,895	oh god how could i have spelled you're wrong?!!?!? thats much worse than being unable to comprehend 5 sentences my 7 year old brother could understand! __________________ '04 2.3l Evo '86 GSXR 750

01-08-2006, 06:23 PM	#19 (permalink)
mac0021 Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Marysville, CA Posts: 93	The S2000s are almost as fast as the 99-04 gts.... __________________ 95 Mustang GT with AODE, aluminum driveshaft, 3:27s, msd coil and distributor, bbk pullies, bbk shorty headers, bbk catted x-pipe, 40 series flowmasters with dumps. 72 Camaro Project Car

01-08-2006, 06:46 PM	#21 (permalink)
mac0021 Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Marysville, CA Posts: 93	My friend has an 01 stock ran 14.1.... That guy probably wasnt trying or he didnt know how to drive.... And a 94-95 gt runs what 15.2 stock???? My money would be on the s2000 if greg only has the mods in his car domain site and the guy could drive. __________________ 95 Mustang GT with AODE, aluminum driveshaft, 3:27s, msd coil and distributor, bbk pullies, bbk shorty headers, bbk catted x-pipe, 40 series flowmasters with dumps. 72 Camaro Project Car

01-08-2006, 07:41 PM	#22 (permalink)
csledd DSG!!! Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Paducah, KY Posts: 3,074	I'm sorry but I have more respect for S2000's than most.. mostly because my friend owns this.. __________________ CAP DSG Registry 2003 Mustang GT - daily driven check out my cardomain for more info 296 rwhp / 310 rwtq Money spent @ AM: $4623.20 1984 Mustang Hatch - low budget project

01-08-2006, 11:20 PM	#24 (permalink)
pimpmustangGT Banned Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 191	actullay an s200o is reall not even close... gts arre about 1 to .5 quicker to 60 and 1-2sec quicker in the quarter so no its that close

01-08-2006, 11:22 PM	#25 (permalink)
pimpmustangGT Banned Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 191	your a fuc king lair... an s200o is nowhere close to 4.5 to 60 - jesus... some people make up the dumbest shi t