me vs s2000 - Page 2

*Lances03SVT* · 01-09-2006, 07:30 PM

Thanks man

Check out this long thread about it.
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...ad.php?t=18409

White04GT · 01-09-2006, 07:30 PM

Quote:

SpringsStang oh god how could i have spelled you're wrong?!!?!? thats much worse than being unable to comprehend 5 sentences my 7 year old brother could understand!

Is your little brother fat too? does mommy get him upgrades for his little huffy bike to lose weight?

01-09-2006, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lances03GT

Thanks man

Check out this long thread about it.
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...ad.php?t=18409

your link works but the next one doesnt...

Ram air doesnt do much at all... but since it sucks over the hood it pulls in cold air, i would think, better than most CAI...

at really high speeds it also give a small boost...

I'm not sayin that ram air will get you 30 hp... or even 5hp...

its hard to tell too cause you cant dyno test the ram air to see if it works...

again, i'm not sayin it give high horse power gains but its definately not a myth... i dont peopl would waste time buildin them if they did nothin at all...

1 BAD S · 01-09-2006, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lances03GT

Thanks man

Check out this long thread about it.
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...ad.php?t=18409

well if their sayin that ram air dosent work, then it was prolly the SS's torque that helped him pull away from me once we hit 120+. makes since. me and him were in the 01 SS and we raced a 01 z28 (both cars stock). we won the first race and the z28 won the second. so i guess that helps with your ram air myth

01-09-2006, 08:00 PM

I didn't want to say **** at first, but i dont believe you took the s2000 lol. That car has just about the same HP as your car and its half the size/weight as yours.

bikerjoe · 01-09-2006, 08:20 PM

torque....

*Lances03SVT* · 01-09-2006, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bikerjoe

torque....

Exactly

mac0021 · 01-09-2006, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bikerjoe

torque....

Still s2000s are capable of low 14s high 13s...he has a 94 gt convertible it runs low 15s high 14s stock. With his mods a s2000 would kill him, if its in good condition and has a decent driver....

Thats like saying a 99-04 gt with exhaust is gonna kill a 98-02 camaro or TA, its not gonna happen....

But if he says he beat it i believe him but either the s2000 was screwed up, he wasnt trying, or didnt know how to drive.

1 BAD S · 01-09-2006, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpinMedia

I didn't want to say **** at first, but i dont believe you took the s2000 lol. That car has just about the same HP as your car and its half the size/weight as yours.

smart guy. its all about the weight. i hate when people are like "but ive got more hp then you". if that was true how come crotch rockets will smoke just about anything. nice to see another stang driver backin the S

bikerjoe · 01-09-2006, 08:50 PM

hey now im backin the s also . it was actually the car i was lookin for b4 i found my stang in whole sale in the back lot of my work....

yea a stock s2000 can prolly beat a stock gt but since we have more torque we can get away with so so driving but the s2000 needs to b driven like a pro cuz of the lack of torque and high rpm hp....

i dunno if im making n e sense to u all

bikerjoe · 01-09-2006, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by csledd

I'm sorry but I have more respect for S2000's than most.. mostly because my friend owns this..

this itb setup is sick tho

plus i ride crouch rockets and that was a main reason y i wanted a car with a "bike engine" .....

mac0021 · 01-09-2006, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bikerjoe

hey now im backin the s also . it was actually the car i was lookin for b4 i found my stang in whole sale in the back lot of my work....

yea a stock s2000 can prolly beat a stock gt but since we have more torque we can get away with so so driving but the s2000 needs to b driven like a pro cuz of the lack of torque and high rpm hp....

i dunno if im making n e sense to u all

Lack of high rpm hp??? Their peak hp number comes at 7800 rpms???

MachGT · 01-09-2006, 09:12 PM

the S2000 is a corner carver. They can run low 14's in the quarter, but they are difficult to launch.

They are about dead even with a 99-04 GT from a roll. I barely pulled on one when I had several bolt ons and 3.73 gears.

a new edge gt should destroy the s2000 from a dead stop. But if the s2000 is launched right, it should about catch up with the gt

1 BAD S · 01-09-2006, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bikerjoe

hey now im backin the s also . it was actually the car i was lookin for b4 i found my stang in whole sale in the back lot of my work....

yea a stock s2000 can prolly beat a stock gt but since we have more torque we can get away with so so driving but the s2000 needs to b driven like a pro cuz of the lack of torque and high rpm hp....

i dunno if im making n e sense to u all

my bad. didnt mean to exclude you. your makein perfect sence to me. love your stangs a$$ in your sig.

01-10-2006, 05:26 AM

believe what ya want...

the first thing i said was that the numbers were against me...

where i got him the worst was at the launch...
after that he couldnt catch up...

i hit bout 115 when he began to slow...

But I'm a VERY good driver...
he must have been a terrible one...

THE IMPORTANT THING IS THIS

The ricer had his ass handed to him :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

01-10-2006, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GREG@94GT

believe what ya want...

the first thing i said was that the numbers were against me...

where i got him the worst was at the launch...
after that he couldnt catch up...

i hit bout 115 when he began to slow...

But I'm a VERY good driver...
he must have been a terrible one...

THE IMPORTANT THING IS THIS

The ricer had his ass handed to him :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

Dude seriously, dont get to excited, i mean you have a fast car and all and i love stangs but he most likely was not trying, especially if he still had his window sticker on the car, meaning the car wasn't even broken in yet.

1 BAD S · 01-10-2006, 09:32 AM

My old Ride

dsdaddy · 01-10-2006, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1 BAD S

My old Ride

Did you trade that off here in Abilene?

1 BAD S · 01-10-2006, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsdaddy

Did you trade that off here in Abilene?

yep. my mom was a manager at star honda so they gave us a pretty good deal

dsdaddy · 01-10-2006, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1 BAD S

yep. my mom was a manager at star honda so they gave us a pretty good deal

I think I know the guy who bought it...

Grimmz · 01-10-2006, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1 BAD S

smart guy. its all about the weight. i hate when people are like "but ive got more hp then you". if that was true how come crotch rockets will smoke just about anything. nice to see another stang driver backin the S

thats not entirely true, thats a half truth...it has to do with transmission loss too... and the S2000 0-60 stock is 6.0....not 4.5 what the hell were you saying?... No doubt it's decently quick, but the key with imports is they have so much stock engine work done, with ours theres alota potential with the stock block, with theirs, you gotta go more bolt ons for power...or new power adder...

bikerjoe · 01-10-2006, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1 BAD S

My old Ride

sick s, i was about two weeks away from buying a white with red interior one, back when i was in the hunt for a new sled

we have an 05 with less than 6k on it now at work for like 27k.. i sit in it everyonce in a while to get it out my system lol

but we also had a white 04 cobra with 600 miles only 627 miles!!! for 28k i think a way better deal...prolly y it was sold in 4.5 secounds lol

1 BAD S · 01-10-2006, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grimmz

thats not entirely true, thats a half truth...it has to do with transmission loss too... and the S2000 0-60 stock is 6.0....not 4.5 what the hell were you saying?... No doubt it's decently quick, but the key with imports is they have so much stock engine work done, with ours theres alota potential with the stock block, with theirs, you gotta go more bolt ons for power...or new power adder...

the fastest time that was recorded for the s2000 0-60 was 4.5. the guy who hit that time was such a good driver he didnt even use the cluth to shift. and i have no idea where you get your info from, i dont know maybe idontknowjacksh*taboutcars.com. the slowest time i have ever seen a s2000 0-60 time was 5.5. im just going to leave that at that.

01-09-2006, 07:30 PM	#31 (permalink)
Lances03SVT Super Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Location: Carthage, Missouri Posts: 9,274	Thanks man Check out this long thread about it. http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...ad.php?t=18409 __________________ _______________________ 2003 Cobra SOLD

01-09-2006, 08:20 PM	#36 (permalink)
bikerjoe bikesrok Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: miami, fl 305 Posts: 703	torque.... __________________ MIAMI VICE

01-09-2006, 08:50 PM	#40 (permalink)
bikerjoe bikesrok Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: miami, fl 305 Posts: 703	hey now im backin the s also . it was actually the car i was lookin for b4 i found my stang in whole sale in the back lot of my work.... yea a stock s2000 can prolly beat a stock gt but since we have more torque we can get away with so so driving but the s2000 needs to b driven like a pro cuz of the lack of torque and high rpm hp.... i dunno if im making n e sense to u all __________________ MIAMI VICE

01-10-2006, 09:32 AM	#47 (permalink)
1 BAD S Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: San Angelo Texas Posts: 720	My old Ride __________________ http://videos.streetfire.net/video/F...03690207B9.htm (My Exhaust Vid)

01-09-2006, 08:00 PM	#35 (permalink)
SpinMedia Posts: n/a	I didn't want to say **** at first, but i dont believe you took the s2000 lol. That car has just about the same HP as your car and its half the size/weight as yours.

01-10-2006, 05:26 AM	#45 (permalink)
GREG@94GT Posts: n/a	believe what ya want... the first thing i said was that the numbers were against me... where i got him the worst was at the launch... after that he couldnt catch up... i hit bout 115 when he began to slow... But I'm a VERY good driver... he must have been a terrible one... THE IMPORTANT THING IS THIS The ricer had his ass handed to him :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: