|
|
|
| Welcome to the Mustang Forums. |
|
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
|
 |
08-07-2006, 04:58 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 560
|
c&l vs bbk
ok guys, I want some advice on plenums. and im going to put this out in advance, please dont just put accufab. I know they are top notch, but also cost a pretty penny so they are not an option right now. so was wondering which would be better, the bbk plenum (which i think looks better) or the c&l plenum. my stang has almost zero mods, other than a cat back and drop in filter. a s/c is in the future but not the near future and the engine will most likely get stroked when that happens, so im not looking long term in respect to either of these plenums not working well with forced air. i know ill have to pay twice for it but by that time with 2 degree's with one in engineering money wont be a problem.
so guys with either of these plenums, give your likes and/or dislikes about them. quality issues and the like. ty in advance..
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 05:06 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
I have a Dragon plenum and I like it. sorry its not one of the ones listed...but IMO if miles per hour sells it, its good.
|
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 05:26 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 11,962
|
i have a gms which is a direct copy of the C&L and i have a bbk TB i spent i think 170shipped total for both and i am happy with the little extra power i got from 4k and up. I need to go run my car to see hwo much this helped et and miles per hour.
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 05:33 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Aviano, Italy
Posts: 394
|
I have a CnL and i noticed a difference. I would look on ebay for a used one to save some money.
__________________
03 Sonic Blue GT (SOLD)
Now own a 92 GT
|
|
|
08-07-2006, 07:38 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,600
|
Plenums are all about the same. About two years ago these were the rage. There is only about 2 hp difference between the best and the worst.
__________________
Black 2000 GT Vert: Hi-Tech Stage 2 Cam; LT's; ProChamber with SLP LM1 cat back; Roush 380R Body kit; Steeda Subframes; Steeda Strut Tower Support; Deep Dish Bullets; FRPP 4:10's; C&L Pleum; BBK 75 TB; Bullitt Suspension; UPR Conrol Arms; Focus Fuel Pump (waiting on dyno)
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 09:17 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
jjtgiants
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 4,177
|
I also had a C&L on my 03 GT and really liked it. The quality was good and noticed some power increase in the upper RPMS....for me personally, I will never put anything BBK on my car....It's a personal choice and opinion..... their products are cheaper for a reason....remember, you usually get what you pay for!
Also, if you end up going with C&L I think they recommend a 75mm throttle body to get maximum power out of the plenum.
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 11:13 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 900
|
I've had a C&L and now i have the accufab, i think the C&L was better. the C&L had a smooth casting on the inside, i had to use a dremel to smooth out the accufab.
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 11:31 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 212
|
I have the BBK 75MM Throttle body/Plenum comb. I'm real happy with the way it has performed and it looks good. I don't think you can go wrong with either.
__________________
Mineral gray 2002 Mustang GT manual 5 speed. Maximum Motor sport suspension.
Forge 4.6 with VT stg 2 cams. BBK 75mm tb and LT's. JLT RAI. 290 HP and 308 tq at the wheels.
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 11:57 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 654
|
I recently switched from a C&L plenum / BBK 75MM TB to the accufab 75 plenum and TB. From a performance perspective they felt the same. The BBK TB was more difficult to set-up and get to idle correctly and the throttle response wasn't as smooth (it felt like you had a little hard spot to push through off of idle, like the pedal was harder to push) it made it jumpy to transition from foot off accelerator (coasting) to foot back on the accelerator. Once you get above 1000 RPM it was just as smooth as the accufab. I can't speak to BBK plenum, I'm sure it's the same as all the others but I did really like the C&L plenum and the accufab
__________________
2003 10th Anniversary Cobra Convertible
All Stock and staying that way... well maybe some pipes since it's so quiet..ahhhh! it's a sickness
1995 mustang GT vert - all black (almost back together)
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 12:56 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 560
|
wow, great info guys thanks so much. i kind of firgured the differance in gains would be minimal, its the over all quality of the product i am worried about. but i guess its up to the overall look of each one cause it sounds like they are both a good choice. as far as a 75mm TB, is there any other companies besides bbk, accufab and pro poducts (which i wont touch with a ten foot pole) that make 75 mm TB. cause i saw a concern raised with the BBK, has anyone else had issues?
|
|
|
08-08-2006, 01:08 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 212
|
I haven't has any issue with my BBK. Install was easy and didn't have any issue with the idle.
The only other TB I can think of is Edelbrock but from what I heard it's made by BBK and cost more.
__________________
Mineral gray 2002 Mustang GT manual 5 speed. Maximum Motor sport suspension.
Forge 4.6 with VT stg 2 cams. BBK 75mm tb and LT's. JLT RAI. 290 HP and 308 tq at the wheels.
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|