Can I Beat This Camaro?
#62
Originally Posted by bikerjoe
lance i love stangs n all but id really like to see pics of ur camaros...only because ur stang is so sick that i kno ur camaros would look awsome also
#63
Well tonights the night.... Im about 2 hours away from the time Im supposed to run the camaro. I am pretty sure im going to leave hard on this guy and he wont be able to catch up. Ive been working on my car since the day last week that he called me out.
1. Put a new intake on that corrected the A/F ratio.
2. Put a fuel safety switch on it.
3. Got my window switch working and my shift light.
Everything is ready for battle now. He wont catch it. Ill post the full story tomorrow morning. Even if I lose (doubt it) Ill let you guys know the truth.
Im so ready to stomp this camaro so I can get back and start partying.
1. Put a new intake on that corrected the A/F ratio.
2. Put a fuel safety switch on it.
3. Got my window switch working and my shift light.
Everything is ready for battle now. He wont catch it. Ill post the full story tomorrow morning. Even if I lose (doubt it) Ill let you guys know the truth.
Im so ready to stomp this camaro so I can get back and start partying.
#67
Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
well lets think that over...
mustang gt... what maybe a bit lighter than a gt... 100-300lb range?
mustang gt... what stock? bout 250 hp?
lt1s 300hp+
gt 5 spd
camaro 6 spd tranny... yes that extra gear make a dif...
correct me if any above was wrong... i just cant see a gt beat an lt1 stock for stock... sorry
mustang gt... what maybe a bit lighter than a gt... 100-300lb range?
mustang gt... what stock? bout 250 hp?
lt1s 300hp+
gt 5 spd
camaro 6 spd tranny... yes that extra gear make a dif...
correct me if any above was wrong... i just cant see a gt beat an lt1 stock for stock... sorry
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by 02wt5sp
Well... first off you got all your #s wrong. The older LT1's came stock with 275(I think 95 and older) and then they bumped it to 285 until the LS1's came out, so no 300+hp. The 99+ pi 4.6's are 260, the 15 or 25 extra hp don't make up for the weight, and the 6 speed doesn't help the camaro out any... so stock for stock a GT will beat an LT1, I've done it before myself, and seen it done may times.
also
Originally Posted by jeredan2003
Theres a guy that works at wendys that wants to race me saturday. Its an LT1 Camaro Z28 with a 125 shot of NX. I dont know the other mods but im sure it has at least an exhaust and intake mods. It also has MT ET Streets on the back.
I have ran a similar camaro that was spraying a 150 shot and he just pulled me after a couple of gears.
This guy seems to be a little ***** cause he tried to act all "hard".
So could I beat this guy from a 40 roll to about 110?
I have ran a similar camaro that was spraying a 150 shot and he just pulled me after a couple of gears.
This guy seems to be a little ***** cause he tried to act all "hard".
So could I beat this guy from a 40 roll to about 110?
i thought this argument was over like a week ago... why must you bring it back up?
#70
Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
i dont recall them putting lt1's i n those camaros (pre 95) i thought they were just plain ol 350's...
also
where does he say it was pre 95?
i thought this argument was over like a week ago... why must you bring it back up?
also
where does he say it was pre 95?
i thought this argument was over like a week ago... why must you bring it back up?
#71
1993 saw the debut of the fourth-generation F-body, and a marked increase in performance. Camaros and Firebirds received a version of the 5.7 liter LT1 engine from the Corvette. This "Gen-II" small-block featured aluminum heads, reverse-flow cooling, and a redesigned intake setup that made good power all the way to the engine's 5800 rpm redline. The 1993 LT1 was rated at 275-horsepower, and LT1-powered F-bodies were good for 14's at the strip.
I brought it back up because you were wrong(and you said correct me if i'm wrong) the most an LT1 in a CAMARO was rated was 285(non-ss/ws6 in 96 and 97) Where did he say is was a vette LT1??
I brought it back up because you were wrong(and you said correct me if i'm wrong) the most an LT1 in a CAMARO was rated was 285(non-ss/ws6 in 96 and 97) Where did he say is was a vette LT1??
#72
Originally Posted by 02wt5sp
1993 saw the debut of the fourth-generation F-body, and a marked increase in performance. Camaros and Firebirds received a version of the 5.7 liter LT1 engine from the Corvette. This "Gen-II" small-block featured aluminum heads, reverse-flow cooling, and a redesigned intake setup that made good power all the way to the engine's 5800 rpm redline. The 1993 LT1 was rated at 275-horsepower, and LT1-powered F-bodies were good for 14's at the strip.
I brought it back up because you were wrong(and you said correct me if i'm wrong) the most an LT1 in a CAMARO was rated was 285(non-ss/ws6 in 96 and 97) Where did he say is was a vette LT1??
I brought it back up because you were wrong(and you said correct me if i'm wrong) the most an LT1 in a CAMARO was rated was 285(non-ss/ws6 in 96 and 97) Where did he say is was a vette LT1??
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by 02wt5sp
1993 saw the debut of the fourth-generation F-body, and a marked increase in performance. Camaros and Firebirds received a version of the 5.7 liter LT1 engine from the Corvette. This "Gen-II" small-block featured aluminum heads, reverse-flow cooling, and a redesigned intake setup that made good power all the way to the engine's 5800 rpm redline. The 1993 LT1 was rated at 275-horsepower, and LT1-powered F-bodies were good for 14's at the strip.
I brought it back up because you were wrong(and you said correct me if i'm wrong) the most an LT1 in a CAMARO was rated was 285(non-ss/ws6 in 96 and 97) Where did he say is was a vette LT1??
I brought it back up because you were wrong(and you said correct me if i'm wrong) the most an LT1 in a CAMARO was rated was 285(non-ss/ws6 in 96 and 97) Where did he say is was a vette LT1??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post