Mustang Forums

Go Back   Mustang Forums > Mustang Madness > General Tech Forum

General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2005, 04:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
Jack The Ripper
 
Posts: n/a
Default Muffler Reccommendations????

So i got my ass handed to me by a 350Z today. Now im craving more power.

Right now, i have a 3in x-pipe welded in, with straights. I love the sound, but it really does nothing for performance, in fact, i'd be willing to say i LOST power. does sound good though.

With the custome exhaust job i have, bolting on a new catback is not an option. it must be welded!!!!!
So rather than do the whole cat-back, im wondering what kind of mufflers i can have my exhaust shop weld in, what would keep a nice deep throated growl, yet GIVE me performance???

Any reccomendations? Estimate HP increase? And as i said, im looking for mufflers ONLY, not a whole catback system, not a midpipe either.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2005, 06:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
FritoBandito
Married.
 
FritoBandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 1,234
Default Flows

I'm a firm believer in flowmaster...price for performance
You can basically pick the loudness you desire by the series you choose. I think 40s are the loudest, I have a catless x pipe running to 2 40 series and it is pretty loud...
FritoBandito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 12:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
MattJ
Senior Member
 
MattJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 10,243
Send a message via AIM to MattJ
Default

I run xlerator mufflers and i really love mine.
MattJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 02:26 AM   #4 (permalink)
Lances03SVT
Super Moderator
 
Lances03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Carthage, Missouri
Posts: 9,224
Send a message via AIM to Lances03SVT Send a message via Yahoo to Lances03SVT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FritoBandito
I'm a firm believer in flowmaster...price for performance
You can basically pick the loudness you desire by the series you choose. I think 40s are the loudest, I have a catless x pipe running to 2 40 series and it is pretty loud...
I have the 10 series Flows,single chamber race mufflers.Very loud with great flow.Will have them for sale as soon as I get my CB installed.
__________________
_______________________
2003 Cobra SOLD

Lances03SVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 02:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Lances03SVT
Super Moderator
 
Lances03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Carthage, Missouri
Posts: 9,224
Send a message via AIM to Lances03SVT Send a message via Yahoo to Lances03SVT
Default

And no 40's don't even compare to these
__________________
_______________________
2003 Cobra SOLD

Lances03SVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 08:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
4.6 Love
Super Moderator
 
4.6 Love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,145
Send a message via Yahoo to 4.6 Love
Default

I am now running dynomax bullets! They sound aswome!
__________________
Go Cowboys!

X pipe and flows
4.6 Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 09:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
spike_africa
Administrator
 
spike_africa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 7,205
Send a message via AIM to spike_africa
Default

This is a question you have to answer yourself go to a www.mustangexhaust.com and check out the clips and pick the sound you like. Me i like macs. so i would say mac.
__________________
Dustin

2002 GT Mustang 5-Speed
Drag Radials,Sprayed,Powershifted


WOOO HOOOO!
spike_africa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 09:50 AM   #8 (permalink)
4.6 Love
Super Moderator
 
4.6 Love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,145
Send a message via Yahoo to 4.6 Love
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spike_africa
This is a question you have to answer yourself go to a www.mustangexhaust.com and check out the clips and pick the sound you like. Me i like macs. so i would say mac.
Mac is a good choice and they are fairly priced!
__________________
Go Cowboys!

X pipe and flows
4.6 Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 10:11 AM   #9 (permalink)
dom
whos gonna ban me next?
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,268
Send a message via AIM to dom
Default

you think your gonna get faster by adding mufflers? you wont. buy some performance mods
__________________
2007 explorer limited
procharged 2002gt sold
new project: 427w c4 9" fox
dom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 10:41 AM   #10 (permalink)
mdot24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OK
Posts: 16
Default

Flows all the way....
__________________
03 DSG Mustang GT

ARXDS
mdot24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 11:09 AM   #11 (permalink)
4.6 Love
Super Moderator
 
4.6 Love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,145
Send a message via Yahoo to 4.6 Love
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dom
you think your gonna get faster by adding mufflers? you wont. buy some performance mods
He might not go faster, but it might get some more backpressure which would give him more HP!
__________________
Go Cowboys!

X pipe and flows
4.6 Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 11:30 AM   #12 (permalink)
dom
whos gonna ban me next?
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,268
Send a message via AIM to dom
Default

backpressure makes you lose power. the more exhaust restriction the less power. the backpressure=power is a myth.
__________________
2007 explorer limited
procharged 2002gt sold
new project: 427w c4 9" fox
dom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 12:20 PM   #13 (permalink)
Stevoneo
Senior Member
 
Stevoneo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 598
Send a message via AIM to Stevoneo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dom
backpressure makes you lose power. the more exhaust restriction the less power. the backpressure=power is a myth.
wrong, you need some backpressure normally if you are not running forced induction. Example my car is hendered right now with open exhaust. the only thing giving me some back pressure is my flowmaster super 40's

I love the sound of flowmasters,

For better flow from them you want to get the super 40's
if you want louder get the orginal 40's (dont flow as well though)

Just check out there website and read up on it.
__________________
2004 Mach 1 - New Baby
Numbers Coming Soon

2001 Mustang GT - In Mustang Heaven
399.65 RWHP 384 Torque
Stevoneo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 12:23 PM   #14 (permalink)
4.6 Love
Super Moderator
 
4.6 Love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,145
Send a message via Yahoo to 4.6 Love
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dom
backpressure makes you lose power. the more exhaust restriction the less power. the backpressure=power is a myth.
Yes you are wrong as someone has already stated! Back pressure makes power!
__________________
Go Cowboys!

X pipe and flows
4.6 Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 12:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
Stevoneo
Senior Member
 
Stevoneo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 598
Send a message via AIM to Stevoneo
Default

however you are not wanting that much backpressure when you are forced induction S/C or Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4.6 Love
Yes you are wrong as someone has already stated! Back pressure makes power!
__________________
2004 Mach 1 - New Baby
Numbers Coming Soon

2001 Mustang GT - In Mustang Heaven
399.65 RWHP 384 Torque
Stevoneo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 01:34 PM   #16 (permalink)
FritoBandito
Married.
 
FritoBandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 1,234
Default low and high

Higher backpressure is needed for low end torque but hurts the motor in the upper rpm range. Too little and you lose your low rpm power (what gets you off the line). Little backpressure increases hp in the upper rpms.
When I installed my x pipe a site claimed dyno results of a 3 hp loss on the low end and a 9 hp gain on the top end for an overall net gain of 6 rwhp.
As long as you have balanced gains and losses and have a positive net gain, you should shave some tenths off in the quarter (maybe 1 or 2)... :tongue8:
FritoBandito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 02:00 PM   #17 (permalink)
Jack The Ripper
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dom
you think your gonna get faster by adding mufflers? you wont. buy some performance mods
Naa, the problem is my car kinda got a bit sluggish on the low end with the striaghts. I havent dyno'ed it, but i bet i easily lost 10-15hp in the low end just by the way it feels. If it were 2-3 hp i doubt i would have noticed it as much as i do.

i love the sound, i dont want to lose that, but i wouldnt mind getting that backpressure back and get a bit more on the low end.

I think i might go with mac. if i dont like it and i miss the sound that much, then ill have em hacked back off. <grin>
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 08:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
Badfish
Listen to reggae.
 
Badfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 8,797
Send a message via AIM to Badfish
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevoneo
wrong, you need some backpressure normally if you are not running forced induction. Example my car is hendered right now with open exhaust. the only thing giving me some back pressure is my flowmaster super 40's

I love the sound of flowmasters,

For better flow from them you want to get the super 40's
if you want louder get the orginal 40's (dont flow as well though)

Just check out there website and read up on it.
i swear to god weve had this conversation b4...i think it was dom and you too..
__________________

'04 2.3l Evo
'86 GSXR 750
Badfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 08:13 PM   #19 (permalink)
ColoradoStang
american muscle
 
ColoradoStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: denver - getting slowed by elevation
Posts: 205
Default

no mufflers :glasses2:
__________________
1997 Mustang GT - 5-speed - Black on Black

3.73 gears/Flowmaster Exhaust/"K&N" Intake/CenterForce Dual Friction Racing Clutch/Nitto 555's/Kenwood CD Player

'97 Mustang GT
Best ET: 14.3 @98 (sae corrected)
Currently saving for some BOOST!
ColoradoStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 08:27 PM   #20 (permalink)
Blue02GT
Ex Mini Smack King
 
Blue02GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 868
Default

What mod's do you have besides the X pipe?
__________________

True Blue 2002 GT Premium 4r70W
1/8 8.205@ 84.780
1/4 12.874@ 107.20
Bolt on's n/a
NMRA #7703
Dyno'd at Modular Depot 251 hp. 291 Tq.


4.30's, 3500 Stall converter, Steeda upper & Lowers, Tokico drag struts, M & M frame connectors, P & A valve body, C&L plenum, Accufab 75mm TB, Jet Hot Long tubes, Hooker O/R X, Steeda catback,SCT tune,Steeda pullies.
Blue02GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 08:45 PM   #21 (permalink)
Jack The Ripper
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue02GT
What mod's do you have besides the X pipe?
Thats really it. Well, i have straights. 3in di xpipe, hits bad to stock size over the axle, and comes out in some 3.5in chrome tips.

oh yah, and FPIK
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2005, 10:24 AM   #22 (permalink)
floppy
Senior Member
 
floppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: royal palm beach, florida
Posts: 1,809
Send a message via AIM to floppy
Default

Quote:
i swear to god weve had this conversation b4...i think it was dom and you too..

this was from a while ago but does a good job at explaining the back pressure myth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MustangMike
.....There is a common misconception that engines need backpressure in order to run properly, generate low end torque, etc. That is simply untrue. Backpressure is a bad thing. Always. Take a look at a top fuel dragster...how much backpressure do you think those zoomie headers make? Very little, and those engines produce 6500 hp.

So, what is backpressure? Any fluid flowing through a pipe experiences drag on the walls of the pipe. This depends on a number of factors, including the diameter of the pipe, the smoothness of the inside of the pipe, the viscosity of the fluid, and the velocity of the fluid. This drag results in a pressure drop through the pipe. In order for the fluid to flow at all, the pressure on one end of the pipe must be higher than at the other. In an exhaust system, that pressure drop is what we refer to as backpressure. It's pretty obvious that the engine has to produce this pressure differential, so the less power it has to spend making pressure to push the exhaust out, the more power it can send to the wheels.

Given that exhaust pipes are pretty smooth, and that we can't change the viscosity (thickness) of the waste gas being forced through the pipes, we are left with basically 2 parameters we can have any control over: The pipe diameter and the gas velocity.

Unfortunately, the pipe diameter controls the gas velocity since the volume of gas is prescribed by the engine. So, we really only have one thing we can change. So, bigger pipes allow less pressure drop for a given volume of gas because the velocity is lower. The pressure drop (backpressure increase) is proportional the gas velocity squared, so if I double the gas velocity (by reducing the cross sectional area of the exhaust pipe by half) then I quadruple the pressure drop.

Well, there's an easy solution for that: Just make the exhaust pipe bigger. Bigger pipe, lower gas velocity, less pressure drop, so less backpressure. Wow, that was easy. After all, this is the way it's done for basically any type of commercial plumbing system. Need less pressure drop on a chilled water pipe or a natural gas line? Just make the pipe bigger.

But wait, there's a problem....Having a huge exhaust pipe has killed my low end torque!!! What's different? Oh, there's no backpressure!! Therefore backpressure makes torque!

Wrong.

An exhaust system is different than just about any other plumbing situation. How? Because the flow is pulsed, and this turns out to be a big deal. Every time a pulse of exhaust gas runs through the pipe, a strange thing happens: it as it passes, it has a little area of vacuum behind it. Just like a NASCAR stocker running around the track, the pulse generates a little bit of a vacuum behind it. In NASCAR, a driver can take advantage of another driver's vacuum by getting right behind him and driving in it. The wind resistance is drastically reduced. This is called drafting.

Well, how big the vacuum behind each pules is depends on the gas velocity. The higher the velocity, the bigger the vacuum the pulse has behind it.

Now, this means that I can "draft" the next pulse, just like in NASCAR. In NASCAR, it's called drafting, in an exhaust system, it's called scavenging. You've probably seen this term used when talking about headers, but the same concept applies in the pipe.

I get the maximum scavenging effect if the gas velocity is high, so the pipe needs to be small. By maximizing the scavenging effect, I help to pull pulses out of the combustion chamber, which means the engine doesn't have to work as hard to do that.

This has the most effect when there's a bunch of time between pulses...in other words, at low rpm. As the revs rise, the pulsed flow becomes more and more like constant flow, and the scavenging effect is diminished.

So, at low rpm I need a small pipe to maximize scavenging, and at high rpm I need a big pipe to minimize pressure drop. My exhaust pipe can only be one size, so it's a compromise. For a given engine, one pipe diameter will make the most overall power (i.e., have the largest area under the curve on a dyno chart).

So, the loss of torque has nothing to do with backpressure, and everything to do with gas velocity. So you need exhaust components that are not restricive (manifolds/headers, mufflers) and that are sized correctly for your application.

To further dispel the "backpressure is necessary" theory, try this if you want. If you have access to a vehicle with open headers, make a block off plate that will bolt to the collector. This plate should have only a 1" hole in it for the exhaust to flow through. That will give you PLENTY of backpressure, and zero scavenging. Then you can report back on how much low end power it has.

The one exception to sizing an exhaust is for turbo cars. Since the turbo is in the exaust stream, the gas flow spinning the impeller tends to come out of the turbo with the pulses greatly diminished. In this case, you can get away with running a larger pipe than on an equivalent HP N/A engine because you can't take as much advantage of the scavenging effect........................................Ther e you have it.

-Mike
basically you dont need back pressure, Dom is right.
__________________
-Floppy



Check out www.MustangGenerations.com
floppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2005, 10:26 AM   #23 (permalink)
floppy
Senior Member
 
floppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: royal palm beach, florida
Posts: 1,809
Send a message via AIM to floppy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slappy
So i got my ass handed to me by a 350Z today. Now im craving more power.

Right now, i have a 3in x-pipe welded in, with straights. I love the sound, but it really does nothing for performance, in fact, i'd be willing to say i LOST power. does sound good though.

With the custome exhaust job i have, bolting on a new catback is not an option. it must be welded!!!!!
So rather than do the whole cat-back, im wondering what kind of mufflers i can have my exhaust shop weld in, what would keep a nice deep throated growl, yet GIVE me performance???

Any reccomendations? Estimate HP increase? And as i said, im looking for mufflers ONLY, not a whole catback system, not a midpipe either.

you might wanna try a slightly small diameter pipe.
__________________
-Floppy



Check out www.MustangGenerations.com
floppy is offline   Reply With Quote