General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms

Muffler Reccommendations????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #2  
Old 07-22-2005, 06:20 PM
FritoBandito's Avatar
Married.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 1,234
Default Flows

I'm a firm believer in flowmaster...price for performance
You can basically pick the loudness you desire by the series you choose. I think 40s are the loudest, I have a catless x pipe running to 2 40 series and it is pretty loud...
 
  #3  
Old 07-23-2005, 12:01 AM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

I run xlerator mufflers and i really love mine.
 
  #4  
Old 07-23-2005, 02:26 AM
Lances03SVT's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Carthage, Missouri
Posts: 9,684
Default

Originally Posted by FritoBandito
I'm a firm believer in flowmaster...price for performance
You can basically pick the loudness you desire by the series you choose. I think 40s are the loudest, I have a catless x pipe running to 2 40 series and it is pretty loud...
I have the 10 series Flows,single chamber race mufflers.Very loud with great flow.Will have them for sale as soon as I get my CB installed.
 
  #5  
Old 07-23-2005, 02:27 AM
Lances03SVT's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Carthage, Missouri
Posts: 9,684
Default

And no 40's don't even compare to these
 
  #6  
Old 07-23-2005, 08:16 AM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,312
Default

I am now running dynomax bullets! They sound aswome!
 
  #7  
Old 07-23-2005, 09:43 AM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 11,974
Default

This is a question you have to answer yourself go to a www.mustangexhaust.com and check out the clips and pick the sound you like. Me i like macs. so i would say mac.
 
  #8  
Old 07-23-2005, 09:50 AM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,312
Default

Originally Posted by spike_africa
This is a question you have to answer yourself go to a www.mustangexhaust.com and check out the clips and pick the sound you like. Me i like macs. so i would say mac.
Mac is a good choice and they are fairly priced!
 
  #9  
Old 07-23-2005, 10:11 AM
dom's Avatar
dom
dom is offline
whos gonna ban me next?
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,268
Default

you think your gonna get faster by adding mufflers? you wont. buy some performance mods
 
  #10  
Old 07-23-2005, 10:41 AM
mdot24's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OK
Posts: 16
Default

Flows all the way....
 
  #11  
Old 07-23-2005, 11:09 AM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,312
Default

Originally Posted by dom
you think your gonna get faster by adding mufflers? you wont. buy some performance mods
He might not go faster, but it might get some more backpressure which would give him more HP!
 
  #12  
Old 07-23-2005, 11:30 AM
dom's Avatar
dom
dom is offline
whos gonna ban me next?
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,268
Default

backpressure makes you lose power. the more exhaust restriction the less power. the backpressure=power is a myth.
 
  #13  
Old 07-23-2005, 12:20 PM
Stevoneo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 598
Default

Originally Posted by dom
backpressure makes you lose power. the more exhaust restriction the less power. the backpressure=power is a myth.
wrong, you need some backpressure normally if you are not running forced induction. Example my car is hendered right now with open exhaust. the only thing giving me some back pressure is my flowmaster super 40's

I love the sound of flowmasters,

For better flow from them you want to get the super 40's
if you want louder get the orginal 40's (dont flow as well though)

Just check out there website and read up on it.
 
  #14  
Old 07-23-2005, 12:23 PM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 6,312
Default

Originally Posted by dom
backpressure makes you lose power. the more exhaust restriction the less power. the backpressure=power is a myth.
Yes you are wrong as someone has already stated! Back pressure makes power!
 
  #15  
Old 07-23-2005, 12:31 PM
Stevoneo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 598
Default

however you are not wanting that much backpressure when you are forced induction S/C or Turbo

Originally Posted by 4.6 Love
Yes you are wrong as someone has already stated! Back pressure makes power!
 
  #16  
Old 07-23-2005, 01:34 PM
FritoBandito's Avatar
Married.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 1,234
Default low and high

Higher backpressure is needed for low end torque but hurts the motor in the upper rpm range. Too little and you lose your low rpm power (what gets you off the line). Little backpressure increases hp in the upper rpms.
When I installed my x pipe a site claimed dyno results of a 3 hp loss on the low end and a 9 hp gain on the top end for an overall net gain of 6 rwhp.
As long as you have balanced gains and losses and have a positive net gain, you should shave some tenths off in the quarter (maybe 1 or 2)... :tongue8:
 
  #18  
Old 07-23-2005, 08:13 PM
Badfish's Avatar
Listen to reggae.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 10,698
Default

Originally Posted by Stevoneo
wrong, you need some backpressure normally if you are not running forced induction. Example my car is hendered right now with open exhaust. the only thing giving me some back pressure is my flowmaster super 40's

I love the sound of flowmasters,

For better flow from them you want to get the super 40's
if you want louder get the orginal 40's (dont flow as well though)

Just check out there website and read up on it.
i swear to god weve had this conversation b4...i think it was dom and you too..
 
  #19  
Old 07-23-2005, 08:13 PM
ColoradoStang's Avatar
american muscle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: denver - getting slowed by elevation
Posts: 205
Default

no mufflers :glasses2:
 
  #20  
Old 07-23-2005, 08:27 PM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 868
Default

What mod's do you have besides the X pipe?
 
  #22  
Old 07-25-2005, 10:24 AM
floppy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: royal palm beach, florida
Posts: 1,805
Default

i swear to god weve had this conversation b4...i think it was dom and you too..

this was from a while ago but does a good job at explaining the back pressure myth.

Originally Posted by MustangMike
.....There is a common misconception that engines need backpressure in order to run properly, generate low end torque, etc. That is simply untrue. Backpressure is a bad thing. Always. Take a look at a top fuel dragster...how much backpressure do you think those zoomie headers make? Very little, and those engines produce 6500 hp.

So, what is backpressure? Any fluid flowing through a pipe experiences drag on the walls of the pipe. This depends on a number of factors, including the diameter of the pipe, the smoothness of the inside of the pipe, the viscosity of the fluid, and the velocity of the fluid. This drag results in a pressure drop through the pipe. In order for the fluid to flow at all, the pressure on one end of the pipe must be higher than at the other. In an exhaust system, that pressure drop is what we refer to as backpressure. It's pretty obvious that the engine has to produce this pressure differential, so the less power it has to spend making pressure to push the exhaust out, the more power it can send to the wheels.

Given that exhaust pipes are pretty smooth, and that we can't change the viscosity (thickness) of the waste gas being forced through the pipes, we are left with basically 2 parameters we can have any control over: The pipe diameter and the gas velocity.

Unfortunately, the pipe diameter controls the gas velocity since the volume of gas is prescribed by the engine. So, we really only have one thing we can change. So, bigger pipes allow less pressure drop for a given volume of gas because the velocity is lower. The pressure drop (backpressure increase) is proportional the gas velocity squared, so if I double the gas velocity (by reducing the cross sectional area of the exhaust pipe by half) then I quadruple the pressure drop.

Well, there's an easy solution for that: Just make the exhaust pipe bigger. Bigger pipe, lower gas velocity, less pressure drop, so less backpressure. Wow, that was easy. After all, this is the way it's done for basically any type of commercial plumbing system. Need less pressure drop on a chilled water pipe or a natural gas line? Just make the pipe bigger.

But wait, there's a problem....Having a huge exhaust pipe has killed my low end torque!!! What's different? Oh, there's no backpressure!! Therefore backpressure makes torque!

Wrong.

An exhaust system is different than just about any other plumbing situation. How? Because the flow is pulsed, and this turns out to be a big deal. Every time a pulse of exhaust gas runs through the pipe, a strange thing happens: it as it passes, it has a little area of vacuum behind it. Just like a NASCAR stocker running around the track, the pulse generates a little bit of a vacuum behind it. In NASCAR, a driver can take advantage of another driver's vacuum by getting right behind him and driving in it. The wind resistance is drastically reduced. This is called drafting.

Well, how big the vacuum behind each pules is depends on the gas velocity. The higher the velocity, the bigger the vacuum the pulse has behind it.

Now, this means that I can "draft" the next pulse, just like in NASCAR. In NASCAR, it's called drafting, in an exhaust system, it's called scavenging. You've probably seen this term used when talking about headers, but the same concept applies in the pipe.

I get the maximum scavenging effect if the gas velocity is high, so the pipe needs to be small. By maximizing the scavenging effect, I help to pull pulses out of the combustion chamber, which means the engine doesn't have to work as hard to do that.

This has the most effect when there's a bunch of time between pulses...in other words, at low rpm. As the revs rise, the pulsed flow becomes more and more like constant flow, and the scavenging effect is diminished.

So, at low rpm I need a small pipe to maximize scavenging, and at high rpm I need a big pipe to minimize pressure drop. My exhaust pipe can only be one size, so it's a compromise. For a given engine, one pipe diameter will make the most overall power (i.e., have the largest area under the curve on a dyno chart).

So, the loss of torque has nothing to do with backpressure, and everything to do with gas velocity. So you need exhaust components that are not restricive (manifolds/headers, mufflers) and that are sized correctly for your application.

To further dispel the "backpressure is necessary" theory, try this if you want. If you have access to a vehicle with open headers, make a block off plate that will bolt to the collector. This plate should have only a 1" hole in it for the exhaust to flow through. That will give you PLENTY of backpressure, and zero scavenging. Then you can report back on how much low end power it has.

The one exception to sizing an exhaust is for turbo cars. Since the turbo is in the exaust stream, the gas flow spinning the impeller tends to come out of the turbo with the pulses greatly diminished. In this case, you can get away with running a larger pipe than on an equivalent HP N/A engine because you can't take as much advantage of the scavenging effect........................................Ther e you have it.

-Mike
basically you dont need back pressure, Dom is right.
 
  #23  
Old 07-25-2005, 10:26 AM
floppy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: royal palm beach, florida
Posts: 1,805
Default

Originally Posted by slappy
So i got my *** handed to me by a 350Z today. Now im craving more power.

Right now, i have a 3in x-pipe welded in, with straights. I love the sound, but it really does nothing for performance, in fact, i'd be willing to say i LOST power. does sound good though.

With the custome exhaust job i have, bolting on a new catback is not an option. it must be welded!!!!!
So rather than do the whole cat-back, im wondering what kind of mufflers i can have my exhaust shop weld in, what would keep a nice deep throated growl, yet GIVE me performance???

Any reccomendations? Estimate HP increase? And as i said, im looking for mufflers ONLY, not a whole catback system, not a midpipe either.

you might wanna try a slightly small diameter pipe.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangDriver03
V6 Tech Forums
4
06-14-2006 12:48 PM
tgslim1290
General Tech Forum
7
03-08-2006 08:14 PM
TEXASPAUL
V6 Tech Forums
15
02-18-2006 08:56 PM
PureStang
The Lounge
5
09-08-2005 12:41 AM
KIT
V6 Tech Forums
1
06-01-2005 08:46 PM



Quick Reply: Muffler Reccommendations????



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:27 AM.