![]() |
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
||||||
| General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 263
|
Just wondering if anybody knows which is more important
What would be a bigger improvement from 300hp/300tq? 500hp/300tq or 300hp/500tq?
__________________
2004 Torch Red Mach I (Manual) Everything Stock Mods Before It's Paid Off (Hopefully): Flowmaster Super 40 Mufflers Black "MUSTANG" Rear Bumper Inserts Possible Mods After It's Paid Off: Gears Tune Supercharger |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
|
If you had 500hp/300tq you would have a very high top speed but might not launch as if you had 300hp/500tq. That much tq would give you a massive jump off the line(with grip, of course) and you'd still go fast but my guess would be the 500/300 car would win in a quarter mile.
tq launches, hp pulls....thats a [very] simple way to think of it. another way to think is.."tq gets you there, hp keeps you there" think about cement trucks and the like, their engiens have TONS of tq, but they have to shift at like 3k max bc after that, they have so little hp that they wouldnt accelerate. f1 cars have huge hp, and extremely little tq. They can fly like a rocket, but could barely tow anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
"kill or be killed"
|
I'm not an expert, but i would say 500hp/300tq would be much better!
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 1,788
|
Turbo Diesel trucks make around 500pounds of torque and maybe 350hp. Watch out for the modded ones though......:wallbash:
__________________
2003 DSG GT 5-speed Hellion 62mm and Flowmaster catback..... My bonestock 2v engine had been through 2 years of NX 100 shot, 3 years running 8-12lbs vortech s-trim, got into boost daily while racing on the weekends, had 157,000 miles on it, and was running like new |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
|
well the reason the huge gas/cement trucks have such little hp is bc their max tq is so low in the rpms. By calculating hp/tq, if for example, they had a max tq of 1000lb-ft@ 2000 rpms(which I have not a clue if its higher or lower) , their hp would be 380, which for a vehicle that weights tons and tons and tons, 380 hp can barely scoot it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 263
|
That's why I'm wondering...
my dad's F-350 diesel may only have 400ish hp and weigh 2x as much as my car, but the 750ish tq gives it real get-up-and-go power. And diesel engines dont shift at 3k rpms because they have no power, it's because they aren't built for high rpm's. Our tractors run about 2200rpms with the throttle 100%, but my dad's diesel truck runs up somewhere around 4,000 and still pulls strong. It's all about the way the engine is built.
__________________
2004 Torch Red Mach I (Manual) Everything Stock Mods Before It's Paid Off (Hopefully): Flowmaster Super 40 Mufflers Black "MUSTANG" Rear Bumper Inserts Possible Mods After It's Paid Off: Gears Tune Supercharger |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
they are related to eachother, horsepower just tells you where you are making the torque in the rpm range..
remember this equation: torque x rpm = power People get so worked up over peak numbers but it is the area under the curve that tells the whole story. My car makes 384 hp @ 6000 rpms and 361 ft lbs @ 5000 rpms, but the torque curve is a nice smooth curve and stays over 300 ft lbs the entire time over 3300 rpms. It feels a bit weak to me till it gets to 3500 rpm and then it just takes off like a bat out of hell. Keep in mind that those numbers are on a mustang dyno, so they are lower then the standard dynojet numbers that most people will show.
__________________
Gotstang?? ![]() 2001 5-speed GT with a few personal touches Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,176
|
Quote:
I never said it was for diesel engines. I used cement/gas trucks as an example, and I dunno what kinda engines they are. All I know is there is tons of tq and very little hp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
i would rather have more tq. than hp. only because i like how it feels lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
I8URVTEC
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 323
|
Horsepower is the ability to DO work, torque is How fast that work gets done. This is the scientific def of both. What do they mean in the real world? Everyone will say, as you can see, something dif. The best has already been stated...And I quote:torque will get you there, hp will keep you there.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HP and TQ #'s for a '02 saleen s281? | the gillz | V6 Tech Forums | 10 | 11-25-2006 07:01 AM |
| The fast and the furious!!! | roushrider81 | The Lounge | 50 | 06-21-2006 07:26 AM |
| Car Show | Lances03SVT | The Lounge | 19 | 10-15-2005 07:53 PM |
| Just wondering??? | roushrider81 | The Lounge | 10 | 08-15-2005 10:07 PM |
| IAC Restrictor Plate Question | dsdaddy | Modular 4.6L Tech | 1 | 06-14-2005 09:52 AM |