![]() |
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
||||||
| General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Hey everyone, hope today's been treating you well so far.
I have a question or two about what your thoughts/opinions are between these two "versions" (for lack of a better term) of MAC's Straight Shot C.A.I. There's this one: (Available thru MustangTuning.com of course )Mac Stainless Steel Straight Shot Air System (2005 GT) http://www.mustangtuning.com/mac-str...t-2005-gt.html It's essentially "just" the cone and heat-shield. Cost $179.95 ($199.99 elsewhere. Thank you very much MustangTuning!) Then there's this one: ( I haven't seen this on MustangTuning.com, that's why the link goes to MAC's web-site) 2005 GT Mass Air System, Complete to Throttle Body http://www.macperformance.com/store/...roduct_ID=1217 From MAC and a couple of other places, it costs $299.50. That's a good $120.00 more. What I'm trying to guage, is whether or not there's any gains to be had, whether it's performance, reliabilty, functionality, etc that would justify spending an extra $120.00 for the second one.
__________________
Go Slow or Go Fast. I really don't care. Just GO! ![]() Year & Model: 2005 GT 5 Spd Dyno Numbers: Zero. Dynosaurs are extinct. Quarter Mile Time: It's 25% of the time it takes me to go a full mile. Mods: Installed: SLP LoudMouths Steeda Complete C.A.I. Kit SCT X-Cal2 Tune Motive 4.10 Gears Sequential Taillights Next: Hurst Short Throw Shift Kit |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
neither one of them are worth the money, get a k&n intake. with the mac intake i believe you will need a tune but the k&n you wont. either a k&n filter or the whole k&n fipk. just dont buy mac...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 1,788
|
Stay Away From MAC Products! They are so cheap. I had a MAC intake and I found that the K&N intake is MUCH better quality. They use a much better design than the flashy crap that hurts performance. Your car is VERY sensitive to changes. You only want to go with an intake that DOESNT require computer tuning. The reason that these intakes need computer tuning is because they screw up the factory parameters. The tuning shouldnt be needed.
__________________
2003 DSG GT 5-speed Hellion 62mm and Flowmaster catback..... My bonestock 2v engine had been through 2 years of NX 100 shot, 3 years running 8-12lbs vortech s-trim, got into boost daily while racing on the weekends, had 157,000 miles on it, and was running like new |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| More Sex: | foncarelli | Pictures | 4 | 06-30-2006 09:11 AM |
| Front Rubbage | shad0ws | The Lounge | 20 | 01-23-2006 03:25 PM |
| SLP LMI and Mac O/R H | PureStang | Videos | 2 | 01-02-2006 08:10 PM |
| Need Torque | roushrider81 | Modular 4.6L Tech | 4 | 07-12-2005 07:32 PM |
| Color coding of injectors | Stangdude27 | Modular 4.6L Tech | 6 | 12-01-2004 10:19 AM |