Mustang Boards

Mustang Boards (/)
-   SMACK Talk! (https://mustangboards.com/smack-talk/)
-   -   me vs s2000 (https://mustangboards.com/smack-talk/8125-me-vs-s2000.html)

Lances03SVT 01-09-2006 06:30 PM

Thanks man :beerchug:

Check out this long thread about it.
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...ad.php?t=18409

White04GT 01-09-2006 06:30 PM


SpringsStang oh god how could i have spelled you're wrong?!!?!? thats much worse than being unable to comprehend 5 sentences my 7 year old brother could understand!
Is your little brother fat too? does mommy get him upgrades for his little huffy bike to lose weight?

GREG@94GT 01-09-2006 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by Lances03GT
Thanks man :beerchug:

Check out this long thread about it.
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...ad.php?t=18409

your link works but the next one doesnt...

Ram air doesnt do much at all... but since it sucks over the hood it pulls in cold air, i would think, better than most CAI...

at really high speeds it also give a small boost...

I'm not sayin that ram air will get you 30 hp... or even 5hp...

its hard to tell too cause you cant dyno test the ram air to see if it works...

again, i'm not sayin it give high horse power gains but its definately not a myth... i dont peopl would waste time buildin them if they did nothin at all...

1 BAD S 01-09-2006 06:45 PM


Originally Posted by Lances03GT
Thanks man :beerchug:

Check out this long thread about it.
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...ad.php?t=18409

well if their sayin that ram air dosent work, then it was prolly the SS's torque that helped him pull away from me once we hit 120+. makes since. me and him were in the 01 SS and we raced a 01 z28 (both cars stock). we won the first race and the z28 won the second. so i guess that helps with your ram air myth

SpinMedia 01-09-2006 07:00 PM

I didn't want to say **** at first, but i dont believe you took the s2000 lol. That car has just about the same HP as your car and its half the size/weight as yours.

bikerjoe 01-09-2006 07:20 PM

torque....

Lances03SVT 01-09-2006 07:21 PM


Originally Posted by bikerjoe
torque....

Exactly :punk:

mac0021 01-09-2006 07:42 PM


Originally Posted by bikerjoe
torque....

Still s2000s are capable of low 14s high 13s...he has a 94 gt convertible it runs low 15s high 14s stock. With his mods a s2000 would kill him, if its in good condition and has a decent driver....

Thats like saying a 99-04 gt with exhaust is gonna kill a 98-02 camaro or TA, its not gonna happen....

But if he says he beat it i believe him but either the s2000 was screwed up, he wasnt trying, or didnt know how to drive.

1 BAD S 01-09-2006 07:45 PM


Originally Posted by SpinMedia
I didn't want to say **** at first, but i dont believe you took the s2000 lol. That car has just about the same HP as your car and its half the size/weight as yours.

smart guy. its all about the weight. i hate when people are like "but ive got more hp then you". if that was true how come crotch rockets will smoke just about anything. nice to see another stang driver backin the S

bikerjoe 01-09-2006 07:50 PM

hey now im backin the s also . it was actually the car i was lookin for b4 i found my stang in whole sale in the back lot of my work....


yea a stock s2000 can prolly beat a stock gt but since we have more torque we can get away with so so driving but the s2000 needs to b driven like a pro cuz of the lack of torque and high rpm hp....

i dunno if im making n e sense to u all

bikerjoe 01-09-2006 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by csledd
I'm sorry but I have more respect for S2000's than most.. mostly because my friend owns this..

http://www.csledd.com/pics/Yesterdays2005/39.jpg


this itb setup is sick tho

plus i ride crouch rockets and that was a main reason y i wanted a car with a "bike engine" .....

mac0021 01-09-2006 07:57 PM


Originally Posted by bikerjoe
hey now im backin the s also . it was actually the car i was lookin for b4 i found my stang in whole sale in the back lot of my work....


yea a stock s2000 can prolly beat a stock gt but since we have more torque we can get away with so so driving but the s2000 needs to b driven like a pro cuz of the lack of torque and high rpm hp....

i dunno if im making n e sense to u all

Lack of high rpm hp??? Their peak hp number comes at 7800 rpms???

MachGT 01-09-2006 08:12 PM

the S2000 is a corner carver. They can run low 14's in the quarter, but they are difficult to launch.

They are about dead even with a 99-04 GT from a roll. I barely pulled on one when I had several bolt ons and 3.73 gears.

a new edge gt should destroy the s2000 from a dead stop. But if the s2000 is launched right, it should about catch up with the gt

1 BAD S 01-09-2006 08:18 PM


Originally Posted by bikerjoe
hey now im backin the s also . it was actually the car i was lookin for b4 i found my stang in whole sale in the back lot of my work....


yea a stock s2000 can prolly beat a stock gt but since we have more torque we can get away with so so driving but the s2000 needs to b driven like a pro cuz of the lack of torque and high rpm hp....

i dunno if im making n e sense to u all

my bad. didnt mean to exclude you. your makein perfect sence to me. love your stangs a$$ in your sig.

GREG@94GT 01-10-2006 04:26 AM

believe what ya want...

the first thing i said was that the numbers were against me...

where i got him the worst was at the launch...
after that he couldnt catch up...

i hit bout 115 when he began to slow...

But I'm a VERY good driver...
he must have been a terrible one...

THE IMPORTANT THING IS THIS

The ricer had his ass handed to him :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

SpinMedia 01-10-2006 06:46 AM


Originally Posted by GREG@94GT
believe what ya want...

the first thing i said was that the numbers were against me...

where i got him the worst was at the launch...
after that he couldnt catch up...

i hit bout 115 when he began to slow...

But I'm a VERY good driver...
he must have been a terrible one...

THE IMPORTANT THING IS THIS

The ricer had his ass handed to him :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:


Dude seriously, dont get to excited, i mean you have a fast car and all and i love stangs but he most likely was not trying, especially if he still had his window sticker on the car, meaning the car wasn't even broken in yet.

1 BAD S 01-10-2006 08:32 AM

My old Ride

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/5422/s2000140ud.jpg

dsdaddy 01-10-2006 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by 1 BAD S

Did you trade that off here in Abilene?

1 BAD S 01-10-2006 09:36 AM


Originally Posted by dsdaddy
Did you trade that off here in Abilene?

yep. my mom was a manager at star honda so they gave us a pretty good deal

dsdaddy 01-10-2006 09:38 AM


Originally Posted by 1 BAD S
yep. my mom was a manager at star honda so they gave us a pretty good deal

I think I know the guy who bought it... :beerchug:

Grimmz 01-10-2006 09:42 AM


Originally Posted by 1 BAD S
smart guy. its all about the weight. i hate when people are like "but ive got more hp then you". if that was true how come crotch rockets will smoke just about anything. nice to see another stang driver backin the S

thats not entirely true, thats a half truth...it has to do with transmission loss too... and the S2000 0-60 stock is 6.0....not 4.5 what the hell were you saying?... No doubt it's decently quick, but the key with imports is they have so much stock engine work done, with ours theres alota potential with the stock block, with theirs, you gotta go more bolt ons for power...or new power adder...

bikerjoe 01-10-2006 10:17 AM


Originally Posted by 1 BAD S

sick s, i was about two weeks away from buying a white with red interior one, back when i was in the hunt for a new sled


we have an 05 with less than 6k on it now at work for like 27k.. i sit in it everyonce in a while to get it out my system lol

but we also had a white 04 cobra with 600 miles only 627 miles!!! for 28k i think a way better deal...prolly y it was sold in 4.5 secounds lol

1 BAD S 01-10-2006 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by Grimmz
thats not entirely true, thats a half truth...it has to do with transmission loss too... and the S2000 0-60 stock is 6.0....not 4.5 what the hell were you saying?... No doubt it's decently quick, but the key with imports is they have so much stock engine work done, with ours theres alota potential with the stock block, with theirs, you gotta go more bolt ons for power...or new power adder...

the fastest time that was recorded for the s2000 0-60 was 4.5. the guy who hit that time was such a good driver he didnt even use the cluth to shift. and i have no idea where you get your info from, i dont know maybe idontknowjacksh*taboutcars.com. the slowest time i have ever seen a s2000 0-60 time was 5.5. im just going to leave that at that.

1 BAD S 01-10-2006 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by dsdaddy
I think I know the guy who bought it... :beerchug:

ask the guy if he bought it with almost 17000 miles on it. i think the guy who bought mine brought the car in for some big problems. im not sure what the problems were, but my mom told me that whoever has it ragged it out pretty bad.

4.6 Love 01-10-2006 12:52 PM

<---is not scared of s2k.... :)

GREG@94GT 01-10-2006 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by SpinMedia
Dude seriously, dont get to excited, i mean you have a fast car and all and i love stangs but he most likely was not trying, especially if he still had his window sticker on the car, meaning the car wasn't even broken in yet.

Dude seriously, shut the **** up... he had his ass handed to him

mac0021 01-10-2006 04:36 PM


Originally Posted by 4.6 Love
<---is not scared of s2k.... :)

What are you scared of?? :devil2:

1 BAD S 01-10-2006 04:47 PM


Originally Posted by 4.6 Love
<---is not scared of s2k.... :)

looks like V. Young is tryin to squeeze out a fart, lol

WaterDR 01-10-2006 05:28 PM

You guys are arguing about a car that is practically rare. i bet there are 150 mustangs on the road for everyone one of these. And of those, prolly 80% are driven by chicks. I have yet to see anyone behind the wheel of one of these younger then 55 besides. To me this is what a retired guy buys his wife for their 40th anniversary...just like a Z-3.

(OK, maybe I overstated this a bit, but you get the point)

1 BAD S 01-10-2006 06:09 PM


Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
You guys are arguing about a car that is practically rare. i bet there are 150 mustangs on the road for everyone one of these. And of those, prolly 80% are driven by chicks. I have yet to see anyone behind the wheel of one of these younger then 55 besides. To me this is what a retired guy buys his wife for their 40th anniversary...just like a Z-3.

(OK, maybe I overstated this a bit, but you get the point)

Im goin to have to pull the BS flag on that one. true they are rare thats what makes them awesome. i was 16 when i got mine, im pretty sure thats no where near 55. and alot of older people dont like them cuz there hard to get in and out of. when i got mine there were only 4000 made that year. there are over 160,000 stangs built a year. dont even try to put the z-3 in the same class as the S. not even close. no wife gets this car. this is your bare bone sports car. no power seats, no trac. control. and you got to love the engine start button


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:28 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands