Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.
View Poll Results: What are your 5.4L swap plans?
Not swapping. You guys are nuts for trying.
1.82%
Not swapping but find the topic interesting.
12.73%
Thinking about doing the swap but not in the next year.
16.82%
Definitely going to do the swap in the next year or so.
25.45%
Doing it now. Looking for an engine or awaiting delivery.
15.45%
Doing it now. Already bought an engine.
18.64%
Done. Got my 5.4L and showin my tail lights to camaro's every day.
7.73%
Screw 5.4, I'm going diesel 4cylinder.
1.36%
Voters: 220. You may not vote on this poll

Anyone intrested in 5.4L swaps, in here. Need you to opine.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #1831  
VOID's Avatar
Totaly pimpalicious 5.42v
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 258
From: Charlotte NC
Default

cool.
 
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 06:18 AM
  #1832  
Twin Turbo 330's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
From: Aviano, Italy
Default

Originally Posted by 2Eighty1
Yea, thats on a GP, this is just a general call us up and buy deal.

Thats still an outstanding price though.

Here's a link to the piston, rods and rings on ebay for $839.99

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/5-4-5...mZ170002914279

How's it going R3dn3ck? I sold my Stang back in December but I have an 87 Notchback now with a 4cyl. and trying to decide if i still want to build a 5.4.
 
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #1833  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

twin... you're back. Welcome. Yes you still want to build a 5.4. in a notch that would be sick fast... you can get notches down to an easy 2900 lbs. thing would accelerate like a lambo.
 
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 09:48 AM
  #1834  
Twin Turbo 330's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
From: Aviano, Italy
Default

Right now the title says it ways 2650 lbs. That's what i'm thinking but i'll probably go 4v since i have to get an engine harness and computer for the swap anyways. I sold my rods and pistons awhile back though but i still have the block and crank and timing cover.
 
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 02:27 PM
  #1835  
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,233
From: bham, ala
Default

anyone else got something put together? since i'm in sight of finishing( but running into lots of stupid things to finish) i wanna see some pics from you guys....

don't make me come looking for you guys....


2v4now: hows your coming along?
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #1836  
Twin Turbo 330's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
From: Aviano, Italy
Default

Is there a difference between 2v, 3v, and 4v blocks? Because i was looking at DSS short blocks and the don't offer short blocks for the 4v just 2v and 3v. I thought they were all the same. Do you think it's just the valve relief in the pistons?
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 09:22 AM
  #1837  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

the 2v and 4v are identical 100%. the 3v have a different mount setup but can be adapted to older cars.
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #1838  
Twin Turbo 330's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
From: Aviano, Italy
Default

Navi's use iron blocks and forged cranks right?
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #1839  
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,233
From: bham, ala
Default

the magazine tested a navi motor and ran it twin turbo to 13300hp without fail. they came fully forged i believe.
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #1840  
Twin Turbo 330's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
From: Aviano, Italy
Default

Originally Posted by myillwillinc
the magazine tested a navi motor and ran it twin turbo to 13300hp without fail. they came fully forged i believe.
Well damn that's pretty sweet if that's true. I found a 03 Navi 4v motor for $3400 on ebay. Don't have the money right now but when i do that would be sweet i was planning on having to change the rods and pistons.
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #1841  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

they're not forged motors... they're stock HE cast pistons and skinny minnie frag-o-rods. I'm pretty sure the navi's after 98 came with a standard cast steel crank. Under that kind of power (assuming 13300 = 1300) the ability of the main caps to stay where they belong will have a lot to do with the motor holding together. You'd have to be nuts to do that on a stock bottom end. I'd be looking for billet rods and main and head studs, o-ringed heads... the works.
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #1842  
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,233
From: bham, ala
Default

i\ll see if i can find the article on it.
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #1843  
2Eighty1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 361
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
they're not forged motors... they're stock HE cast pistons and skinny minnie frag-o-rods. I'm pretty sure the navi's after 98 came with a standard cast steel crank. Under that kind of power (assuming 13300 = 1300) the ability of the main caps to stay where they belong will have a lot to do with the motor holding together. You'd have to be nuts to do that on a stock bottom end. I'd be looking for billet rods and main and head studs, o-ringed heads... the works.
This man speaks the truth... Wait, I think I said that back about page one hundo.

All 5.4 Motors until 1998 were forged crank
From 1999-Current ONLY the Lightning had the forged crank
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #1844  
2Eighty1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 361
Default

Originally Posted by myillwillinc
anyone else got something put together? since i'm in sight of finishing( but running into lots of stupid things to finish) i wanna see some pics from you guys....

don't make me come looking for you guys....


2v4now: hows your coming along?


Ive been lazy this weekend.

I need to package up my pistons and rings to ship back still, I should do that tonight actually.
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 11:28 AM
  #1845  
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,233
From: bham, ala
Default

i so close to cranking the beast up but there are so many little details i have to resolve first.

note to all: the waterneck on 96-98 motors are diffrent then 2000-up. the later points to the right and the earlier one points to the left. also the newer ones have smaller holes for the bolts since it is aluminum and the plastic ones have metal sleeves in it and bigger holes for it.
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #1846  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

I have a couple spare water necks if you need one... freebie+ shipping.
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #1847  
Twin Turbo 330's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
From: Aviano, Italy
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
they're not forged motors... they're stock HE cast pistons and skinny minnie frag-o-rods. I'm pretty sure the navi's after 98 came with a standard cast steel crank. Under that kind of power (assuming 13300 = 1300) the ability of the main caps to stay where they belong will have a lot to do with the motor holding together. You'd have to be nuts to do that on a stock bottom end. I'd be looking for billet rods and main and head studs, o-ringed heads... the works.
I did alot of research last night and all the info i read didn't have the navi's with all forged. That's okay it won't be that bad to do.
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #1848  
VOID's Avatar
Totaly pimpalicious 5.42v
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 258
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Originally Posted by myillwillinc
anyone else got something put together? since i'm in sight of finishing( but running into lots of stupid things to finish) i wanna see some pics from you guys....

don't make me come looking for you guys....


2v4now: hows your coming along?
Well mine came to a major problem yesterday in the form of me wrecking my car. I was sandwhiched between a car going 5 mph and one going 40 mph. I wonder if they are going to total it out. If so i'm getting a fox hatchback.
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #1849  
2Eighty1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 361
Default

Originally Posted by VOID
Well mine came to a major problem yesterday in the form of me wrecking my car. I was sandwhiched between a car going 5 mph and one going 40 mph. I wonder if they are going to total it out. If so i'm getting a fox hatchback.
Damn bro, thats a slight setback.

You make it out ok ? Any pics of the carnage ?
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #1850  
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,233
From: bham, ala
Default

dam bro thats 2 guys here losing thier car to wrecks
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #1851  
Twin Turbo 330's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
From: Aviano, Italy
Default

Hope your alright buddy car accident's are never fun.
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #1852  
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,233
From: bham, ala
Default

ok, this is gonna be fun. i just put 8 qts of oil in the motor and remote oil filter and it is only halfway up the safe area on the dipstick. on the old motor all i had was the stock oil pan from my 4.6 and it took 7 qts then. so i guess the more oil the cooler it will stay.
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #1853  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

with my oil cooler, -8 lines and the canton pan I should have a 9.5qt capacity. Isn't it great. More oil is better...
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 09:43 AM
  #1854  
myillwillinc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,233
From: bham, ala
Default

well also more oil stays healthy longer....
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:27 AM
  #1855  
2Eighty1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 361
Default

I was thinking yesterday - why pay 250 for an aftermarket oil pan, when I can modify a stock one for the cost of digging out the welder.
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #1856  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

If I had time to weld one up I'd just make it from all the spare aluminum plate I have but I don't have time so canton it is.

Any of you guys know how to tig weld and want to fab one up for me? I'll send you an oil pan and a bunch of thin plate aircraft grade aluminum.
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #1857  
2Eighty1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 361
Default

What do you gain by having more oil ?

That is, on a non roadcourse car with a redline approx the same as stock
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #1858  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

longer oil life, cooler oil temps, increased part life... better lubrication in general due to the increase in additives that the oil is capable of delivering. THe additives are the part that wears out... the base stock is usually fine for much longer than 3K miles. With more total oil you can safely stretch out your change intervals.
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #1859  
2Eighty1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 361
Default

Originally Posted by r3dn3ck
longer oil life, cooler oil temps, increased part life... better lubrication in general due to the increase in additives that the oil is capable of delivering. THe additives are the part that wears out... the base stock is usually fine for much longer than 3K miles. With more total oil you can safely stretch out your change intervals.
So thats the big gain, is oil change intervals?

If oil was changed at 3k there would be no real gain since the additives would be fresh ?
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #1860  
r3dn3ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,865
From: Magrathea/California
Default

at the 3K interval you'd still have a greater proportion of the additive pack still active so you'd have overall longer engine part life all else being equal. It's better for the motor but not in hp gain way... more overall reliability.
 



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:39 PM.