Dynojet Results are in.....
#1
Dynojet Results are in.....
ok yesterday i finally got the chance to dyno my 04 Gt 5 spd with the mods listed in my sig...i have to say that im very happy.. i think i may have a factory freak :naka:
-Mike :icon_rr:
-Mike :icon_rr:
#3
Yeah, I agree it's kinda high for intake/exhaust/pullies. It's a nice 30-35rwhp boost. Those numbers are about the same as the 99 Cobra made without the "fix", lol. Maybe your numbers aren't SAE corrected.
#7
I can definitly beleive those numbers as well. Here are mine and my mods to boot...
Mac Straight Shot w/ 85mm MAF, Accufab 75mm T/b and Elbow, Mac Prochamber and Flowpath Catback, FRPP 4.10 gear, Superchips Custom Dyno Tune, H&R Sport Springs, 2003 Cobra Front Bumper, White Face Gauges, Steeda Tri-Ax
Numbers were 273HP and 314Tq
People doubt mine as well but here is the dyno sheet too....
Mac Straight Shot w/ 85mm MAF, Accufab 75mm T/b and Elbow, Mac Prochamber and Flowpath Catback, FRPP 4.10 gear, Superchips Custom Dyno Tune, H&R Sport Springs, 2003 Cobra Front Bumper, White Face Gauges, Steeda Tri-Ax
Numbers were 273HP and 314Tq
People doubt mine as well but here is the dyno sheet too....
#8
gtnumber2,
If you've seen some people kick out numbers at 228HP with more mods then those people were having some SERIOUS issues!! I have hardly ever seen any 1999 up Stang dyno under 225 BONE STOCK and I have seen a GOOD few!!
If you've seen some people kick out numbers at 228HP with more mods then those people were having some SERIOUS issues!! I have hardly ever seen any 1999 up Stang dyno under 225 BONE STOCK and I have seen a GOOD few!!
#11
honestly i think they bumped up the 04 gt without telling anybody there was an 02 there with moremods than I, had a steeda intake, x pipe with cats a diablo chip and flows cat-back..and he put down 10 less hp and 12 less torque...and Tunez is an 04 and his numbers are equally awesome..
i'm not complaining :icon_rr:
-Mike
i'm not complaining :icon_rr:
-Mike
#12
Mine should be going on a Dynojet soon to double check the numbers. Mustang Dynos typically show lower numbers than Dynojets do and if that was the case, it definitly be a freak. I have run with a lightly modded LS1 camaro with no problems and outran a few. I know that many people say that should be no problem but in all honesty, those cars, are beasts. At the same time, I have seen a good few cars with numbers equally as impressive as mine are.
#13
i spoke to a friend of mine at my shop who knows his stuff, he says that ford did change the GT slightly for 04 as they did they v6 (from 3.8 to 3.9) and that they didnt change the hp rating but they are making more around 275 hp CRank stock hp..who knew? :blob10:
-Mike
-Mike
#14
They made no changes between 00 and 04, same power. HP will vary from car to car. I made 250 rwhp through an automatic with similar mod's, mines an 02. Automatics typically makes 5% less rwhp due to drive train loss.
260 is very good for what mod's you have, you definatley got a good one from the factory. Should run real nice at the track. Low 13's with a good 60" time.
260 is very good for what mod's you have, you definatley got a good one from the factory. Should run real nice at the track. Low 13's with a good 60" time.
#15
im really hoping to get deep into the 13's...my 14.3 run was ****ty because i couldnt take any air out of the tires..their compressor was broken and i dont think its a good idea to drive 150 miles home with 15 psi in my tires, so hopefully when i go this wensday i'll get soem good 13 sec passes, i might get my o/f x tomorrow if eveyrthing goes well
-Mike ccasion1
-Mike ccasion1
#16
Originally Posted by MustangMike
im really hoping to get deep into the 13's...my 14.3 run was ****ty because i couldnt take any air out of the tires..their compressor was broken and i dont think its a good idea to drive 150 miles home with 15 psi in my tires, so hopefully when i go this wensday i'll get soem good 13 sec passes, i might get my o/f x tomorrow if eveyrthing goes well
-Mike ccasion1
-Mike ccasion1
#17
yeah i pretty much have the same mods plus gears. and i am only pulling a 13.5 at 103. it could be faster but i was racing with 245 45 eagle gatorbacks with 18 or 20 psi in them i forget its been a few months since i been at the track. and some guy posted his dyno numbers and the weight of his car is only 3200 lbs. when i weighed mine it was 3340 without spare tire and tank on empty and a fully gutted 99-04 mustang should be at about 3000 lbs??? ive checked my track times to my vehicle weight with me in it online and it showed that my car has about the same amount of horsepower that you are pushing.
#18
Originally Posted by Tunez
I can definitly beleive those numbers as well. Here are mine and my mods to boot...
Mac Straight Shot w/ 85mm MAF, Accufab 75mm T/b and Elbow, Mac Prochamber and Flowpath Catback, FRPP 4.10 gear, Superchips Custom Dyno Tune, H&R Sport Springs, 2003 Cobra Front Bumper, White Face Gauges, Steeda Tri-Ax
Numbers were 273HP and 314Tq
People doubt mine as well but here is the dyno sheet too....
Mac Straight Shot w/ 85mm MAF, Accufab 75mm T/b and Elbow, Mac Prochamber and Flowpath Catback, FRPP 4.10 gear, Superchips Custom Dyno Tune, H&R Sport Springs, 2003 Cobra Front Bumper, White Face Gauges, Steeda Tri-Ax
Numbers were 273HP and 314Tq
People doubt mine as well but here is the dyno sheet too....
#20
Originally Posted by WhiteDevil
Your car weighs 3240lbs?!? uhmm, sorry to dissapoint you there, but a factory freak is one thing, but uh...NO! you have like 15peak hp in mods and thats to the crank...sorry, but unless you didn't notice a 50shot that they hid in your trunk then I am calling :3some: Well, you guys dont have a "BS" smiley on this forum, but this one is freakin awesome!
#21
Originally Posted by Tunez
I'm guessing that you are obviously lost to think that my mods will only net 15hp AT THE CRANK of all things. A simple chip or plug in programmer has netted close to 10-15 at the WHEELS alone. I have all of my listed mods and a custom dyno tune to boot. Not only that, if you want to complain and try to disprove my numbers, then tell me how I can reduce a video's size and I will post up a dyno vid for you so you can see it happening first hand. In other words, don't be angry because you weren't one of the lucky ones out of many who have hit numbers that high with similar mods, be happy for those who were that lucky....
Bryan
#23
Originally Posted by Stangdude27
That is some good HP #'s. With all my mods done to my car I've only gotten a pull of 244 HP to the rear. and 267 for torque. and that is SAE corrected.
Bryan
#24
Originally Posted by Tunez
Mine should be going on a Dynojet soon to double check the numbers. Mustang Dynos typically show lower numbers than Dynojets do and if that was the case, it definitly be a freak. I have run with a lightly modded LS1 camaro with no problems and outran a few. I know that many people say that should be no problem but in all honesty, those cars, are beasts. At the same time, I have seen a good few cars with numbers equally as impressive as mine are.
#25
Originally Posted by madmatt
Hey, not to call bs, but those numbers cant be SAE corrected. Some cars with longtubes and cams dont pull those kind of numbers. Just a thought
#26
Different cars make different amounts of power. Those are pretty good numbers for those mods. Unfortunately, you can't race a dyno or the numbers they produce. Which leaves them to be nothing more than that..numbers. I let my car prove itself at the track...that is my "dyno" :toothy10:
BTW my race weight is 3300lbs
Adam
BTW my race weight is 3300lbs
Adam
#28
Originally Posted by WhiteDevil
nice, is that with you in it too? That is a pretty damn nice time, nothin better than breakin a new barrier. What all you have done anyways?
Adam
#29
247hp after the cams?? wow, your cams alone should have put you there, what was your a/f? Do you have a graph, i would love to see it. Also, what were your 60's that run and MPH at the end. Also kinda tires you run? Thats cool man, I have a set of the stage II's on the way, just need to get the springs next check and they are gonna be ready to go
#30
Originally Posted by WhiteDevil
exactly, LOL, the best engine builders out there are barely pulling 340-350rwhp out of an N/A GT without drastically changing CR.. With the "factory freaks" though, who knows what they could do. I mean geez, they could probly break 400rwhp N/A with your stock cams right I'm done with this thread though, unsubscribing I am just giving you a hard time by the way, hopefully you don't get too upset with me :angry4:
Bryan
Bryan
Like I said before, no anger from me. I love to "debate" about this stuff......