Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Here's my plan! Tell me what you think

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-13-2005 | 10:25 PM
Badfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Listen to reggae.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,698
From: Colorado Springs
Exclamation Here's my plan! Tell me what you think

Well I'm going for the Fastest N/A 2v street stang possible
What i mean by street, is having all the comforts of a street vehicle, such as A/C, stereo, etc...only weight reduction i plan to do is rear seat delete and a front tubular suspension (any other ideas?)

Here's what i have :

-SLP O/R X-Pipe
-SLP Loudmouth Exhaust
-Steeda Underdrive Pullies
-K&N FIPK CAI
-Tuned with DiabloSport Predator
-FFRP 4.10 Gears
-Ford Racing C-springs
-MGW Short Throw Shifter

Here's what I'm going to do:
-SLP Ceramic Coated Longtube Headers
-VT Stage 2 Cams w/ Comp Springs
-Fox Lake Modular P-51 Intake manifold
-Ported Heads by Fox Lake
-SCT Xcal 2
-Dyno Tune

Opinions please, what else would you do? would you do it different? Would you not do something?

Note: I realize that this same amount of power can come from a blower for probably a cheaper price. Thats not the point of this. The point of this is to push the N/A 2v to its limits while still retaining streetabilty.
 
  #2  
Old 06-14-2005 | 02:56 AM
Joel's98GT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 72
From: Columbus, ohio
Default

it looks like your going to need a nice size credit card.
 
  #3  
Old 06-14-2005 | 03:16 AM
Badfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Listen to reggae.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,698
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Yeah this will all be over time.
 
  #4  
Old 06-14-2005 | 05:34 AM
cobra4123's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 826
From: Louisville, KY
Default

sounds like a plan. wouldn't also bump up u injectors?
 
  #5  
Old 06-14-2005 | 11:41 AM
Badfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Listen to reggae.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,698
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Actually...I'm not sure...anyone?
 
  #6  
Old 06-16-2005 | 11:55 AM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,312
From: Mexico
Default

The fox lake intake really shines when you run boost!
 
  #7  
Old 06-16-2005 | 12:03 PM
Badfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Listen to reggae.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,698
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Latley i have been re-evaluating my plan.
 
  #8  
Old 06-17-2005 | 02:45 PM
silvergt's Avatar
Speed Racer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 202
Default

75mm throttle body definitely, bigger mass air flow sensor and injectors might be good in there too
 
  #9  
Old 06-17-2005 | 02:54 PM
4.6 Love's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,312
From: Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by silvergt
75mm throttle body definitely, bigger mass air flow sensor and injectors might be good in there too
Unless, he's making well over 300 rwhp he doesn't need a bigger mass air, or bigger injectors!
 
  #10  
Old 06-17-2005 | 04:22 PM
ModMotorRacer's Avatar
Modular Misfit
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 329
From: Iowa
Default

On a NA motor the BSFC (Brake Specific Fuel Consumption) is about .45. So take your 8 /19lb injectors and multiply 8x19=152#/hr of fuel your car flows. Divide that by .45 which equals 337.77. This means that at 39.5psi of fuel pressure 19lb injectors will support 337 crank hp. This is also assuming 100% duty cycle which doesn't happen so these numbers are slightly lower. I'd say anything around 275rwhp its better to move up to 24lbers. Better to be safe than sorry.


Adam
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1982 mustang 5.0
Pictures
8
05-02-2006 05:02 PM
Badfish
Pictures
63
05-01-2006 07:14 PM
cuban3jumper
Pictures
30
11-06-2005 12:02 AM
dannyb785
The Lounge
27
05-24-2005 01:14 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:09 AM.