Lets see who gets the answer to this one...
#61
if the thread mill was spinning backwards and the plane was at a stand still the plane wouldn't move (i am disregardly the small frictional force in the bearings of the wheel because it is incredibly small)
like a skate board on a regular tread mill...
got it?
i hope you do... I can;t think of anyother way to put it
like a skate board on a regular tread mill...
got it?
i hope you do... I can;t think of anyother way to put it
#62
Originally Posted by Badfish
lift is created because the plane is moving. the engines are pushing the plane through the air regardless of the wheels spinning
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by SlicK
I realize that but the plane is still not moving so none of it is relevant. The plane itself either has to be in motion, going fast enough to create the lift, or it has to have some outside force (a huge *** fan) creating enough wind power to create it's own lift.
fire that plane up and it will take off.
you have to understand that the plane can move without its wheels...it does this all during flight. the engines create thrust and push against the air...thats what moves the plane...not the wheels it sits on.
#64
Originally Posted by zigzagg321
well its not moving because the engines arent running then...NOT because of the treadmill.
fire that plane up and it will take off.
you have to understand that the plane can move without its wheels...it does this all during flight. the engines create thrust and push against the air...thats what moves the plane...not the wheels it sits on.
fire that plane up and it will take off.
you have to understand that the plane can move without its wheels...it does this all during flight. the engines create thrust and push against the air...thats what moves the plane...not the wheels it sits on.
the question is worded a little funny... but the key factor is that the wheels have no affect on the planes movement...
#65
Originally Posted by zigzagg321
well its not moving because the engines arent running then...NOT because of the treadmill.
fire that plane up and it will take off.
you have to understand that the plane can move without its wheels...it does this all during flight. the engines create thrust and push against the air...thats what moves the plane...not the wheels it sits on.
fire that plane up and it will take off.
you have to understand that the plane can move without its wheels...it does this all during flight. the engines create thrust and push against the air...thats what moves the plane...not the wheels it sits on.
But if it was a jet engine, the air is sucked in from the forward motion and then ignited as thrust out the ***. So jets are kind of a push/pull combination.
kekeke.
#66
Originally Posted by GREG@SN95
yes...
the question is worded a little funny... but the key factor is that the wheels have no affect on the planes movement...
the question is worded a little funny... but the key factor is that the wheels have no affect on the planes movement...
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by PColav6
Well technically, planes aren't pushed through the air, they're pulled. :P
But if it was a jet engine, the air is sucked in from the forward motion and then ignited as thrust out the ***. So jets are kind of a push/pull combination.
kekeke.
But if it was a jet engine, the air is sucked in from the forward motion and then ignited as thrust out the ***. So jets are kind of a push/pull combination.
kekeke.
#69
Originally Posted by SlicK
I must have posted when you guys were typing that up because I didn't think the engines were on when you brought up the skateboard parallel.
#70
Originally Posted by Badfish
you could get into it super deep, and say the bearings in the wheels cant handle the friction causing them to come off or burst, and the plane wont take off
somone argued that on the SVTP one
somone argued that on the SVTP one
or the tires pop... they explode and send rubber flying into the jet... then the rubber ****s up the engine and it explodes...
not only does the plane not take off... but everyone dies and then the treadmill keeps goin in reverse and send the flaming plane backwards and the plane takes out the radio tower... then that burns the **** down and everyone lives happily ever after
#71
Originally Posted by Badfish
you could get into it super deep, and say the bearings in the wheels cant handle the friction causing them to come off or burst, and the plane wont take off
somone argued that on the SVTP one
somone argued that on the SVTP one
#72
Originally Posted by GREG@SN95
lmao...
or the tires pop... they explode and send rubber flying into the jet... then the rubber ****s up the engine and it explodes...
not only does the plane not take off... but everyone dies and then the treadmill keeps goin in reverse and send the flaming plane backwards and the plane takes out the radio tower... then that burns the **** down and everyone lives happily ever after
or the tires pop... they explode and send rubber flying into the jet... then the rubber ****s up the engine and it explodes...
not only does the plane not take off... but everyone dies and then the treadmill keeps goin in reverse and send the flaming plane backwards and the plane takes out the radio tower... then that burns the **** down and everyone lives happily ever after
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by PColav6
Whatever, planes are still pulled through the air.
I hope you realize that nit-picking everything isnt cool.
the thrust from a jet engine comes from the fact that it PUSHES against the air BEHIND IT, thus moving the object.
no **** the air goes in the front.
#75
ok guys ive been busting my ***** on this one all day. lets say the plane is sitting on the treadmill, and the treadmill is turned on. the plane is going to go backwards, cuz its heavy. tires wont spin. i dont know where that was going. but now i got another point. as long as the treadmill is going as fast as the wheels i dont think it will take off. i think it will run out of gas because of all the gas it will have to burn to lift off. or it will run out of treadmill/runway space. case closed again. now dont bring up this, well the plane has infinite fuel, or the runway goes on forever. the speed of the treadmill might be like 50 knots below the enging speed. therefore the plane will only be going 50 knots at full throttle, thats why he will run out of gas. ok my ***** are busted. im done
#76
ok...
forget about the wheels... floating plane...
plane is hovering over the treadmill... the tread mill moves the opposite direction as the throttle is increased... will it take off? yes... bugs bunny could be underneith jacking off... doesn't affect the plane...
that being said... all the wheels do is make the plane hover...
get it?
forget about the wheels... floating plane...
plane is hovering over the treadmill... the tread mill moves the opposite direction as the throttle is increased... will it take off? yes... bugs bunny could be underneith jacking off... doesn't affect the plane...
that being said... all the wheels do is make the plane hover...
get it?
#77
Originally Posted by GREG@SN95
ok...
forget about the wheels... floating plane...
plane is hovering over the treadmill... the tread mill moves the opposite direction as the throttle is increased... will it take off? yes... bugs bunny could be underneith jacking off... doesn't affect the plane...
that being said... all the wheels do is make the plane hover...
get it?
forget about the wheels... floating plane...
plane is hovering over the treadmill... the tread mill moves the opposite direction as the throttle is increased... will it take off? yes... bugs bunny could be underneith jacking off... doesn't affect the plane...
that being said... all the wheels do is make the plane hover...
get it?
#79
Originally Posted by 1 BAD S
well now theres just a fake plane. ill work on another theory tonight. does anyone know the TRUE answer to this. or is it a never ending ball buster
lol we've been telling you the true answer but you keep saying its wrong...
the plane WILL take off.
#80
Originally Posted by Badfish
your rigth the treadmill thing was a bad example.
but what is stopping the plane from moving foward? the engines push the plane foward through the atmposphere. regardless of what the wheels are doing
but what is stopping the plane from moving foward? the engines push the plane foward through the atmposphere. regardless of what the wheels are doing
Here is another example, take a car on a dyno. With no straps to hold the car there, if you use the car to turn the wheels the car will move......BUT, if the dyno itself turns at the same rate of speed as the cars wheels, it will sit there not moving. It's the exact same concept.
IF you don't believe me, believe Newton. I would love someone to argue his opinion:
And I quote:
Newton's Second Law
Newton's first law of motion predicts the behavior of objects for which all existing forces are balanced. The first law - sometimes referred to as the "law of inertia" - states that if the forces acting upon an object are balanced, then the acceleration of that object will be 0 m/s/s. Objects at equilibrium (the condition in which all forces balance) will not accelerate. According to Newton, an object will only accelerate if there is a net or unbalanced force acting upon it. The presence of an unbalanced force will accelerate an object - changing either its speed, its direction, or both its speed and direction.
Newton's first law of motion predicts the behavior of objects for which all existing forces are balanced. The first law - sometimes referred to as the "law of inertia" - states that if the forces acting upon an object are balanced, then the acceleration of that object will be 0 m/s/s. Objects at equilibrium (the condition in which all forces balance) will not accelerate. According to Newton, an object will only accelerate if there is a net or unbalanced force acting upon it. The presence of an unbalanced force will accelerate an object - changing either its speed, its direction, or both its speed and direction.
Go here to read more.
#81
Nevermind, my last statment. I will leave it there because it's a damn good argument. But, the plane will take off! The wheels will just spin twice as fast and have nothing to do with the equation.
Damn it, now I have extra brain cells I have to burn off with alcohol this weekend!!!
Damn you Fonc, you made me think about the subject I hate most! Physics!!!!
Damn it, now I have extra brain cells I have to burn off with alcohol this weekend!!!
Damn you Fonc, you made me think about the subject I hate most! Physics!!!!
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Rabbit
I still agree with 1 bad S. And your treadmill comparison with roller skates is exactly the same as the comparison with the place. YOU have rockets pushing you forward, and the treadmill going the opposite direction. SO you are at a standstill.
Here is another example, take a car on a dyno. With no straps to hold the car there, if you use the car to turn the wheels the car will move......BUT, if the dyno itself turns at the same rate of speed as the cars wheels, it will sit there not moving. It's the exact same concept.
IF you don't believe me, believe Newton. I would love someone to argue his opinion:
And I quote:
SOOOOO< force pushing the plane is 100knots and treadmills is moving at 100knots Then, ACCELERATION = 0!!!!
Go here to read more.
Here is another example, take a car on a dyno. With no straps to hold the car there, if you use the car to turn the wheels the car will move......BUT, if the dyno itself turns at the same rate of speed as the cars wheels, it will sit there not moving. It's the exact same concept.
IF you don't believe me, believe Newton. I would love someone to argue his opinion:
And I quote:
SOOOOO< force pushing the plane is 100knots and treadmills is moving at 100knots Then, ACCELERATION = 0!!!!
Go here to read more.
since the wheels themselves ARE NOT POWERED the tradmill is irrelevant.
you cant use ANY moving object that gets its power delivered to the ground by its wheels.
#85
ok i got a new concept. thought about it last night. say you have a raft in the water. and say you want to go up stream. the water is the treadmill and the raft is the plane. lets put a motor, or even an engine on the back of the raft. the water is running in the opposite direction of the raft, and it increases speed with the motor of the raft. so lets say you put the throttle of the raft at 5mph. then you turn the water stream to 5 mph. the boat will just sit still. it wont go anywhere. so then the boat increases to 10 mph, then the water does. boat still not going anywhere
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by 1 BAD S
ok i got a new concept. thought about it last night. say you have a raft in the water. and say you want to go up stream. the water is the treadmill and the raft is the plane. lets put a motor, or even an engine on the back of the raft. the water is running in the opposite direction of the raft, and it increases speed with the motor of the raft. so lets say you put the throttle of the raft at 5mph. then you turn the water stream to 5 mph. the boat will just sit still. it wont go anywhere. so then the boat increases to 10 mph, then the water does. boat still not going anywhere
the prop on the boat motor is in contact with the "treadmill" ie. the water
the prop on a plane engine or the jet engine is NOT in contact with the "treadmill" ie. the runway.
#87
Originally Posted by zigzagg321
you still dont get it.
the prop on the boat motor is in contact with the "treadmill" ie. the water
the prop on a plane engine or the jet engine is NOT in contact with the "treadmill" ie. the runway.
the prop on the boat motor is in contact with the "treadmill" ie. the water
the prop on a plane engine or the jet engine is NOT in contact with the "treadmill" ie. the runway.
#88
alright, im going to have to be honest. i first read the question an di thought instantly that the plane would not take off. i had it set in my mind that it would not take off. as i read through the thread i was getting mad at the people who said it would take off and proceeded to call all of the idiots. i read some more threads and then the concept dawned on me. The plane CAN take off. Just like all the people that replied before me said, the wheels are not driving the plane, jet propulsion is. therefore the treadmill has no effect on the forward movement on the plane. So in fact i was the idiot to begin with. but nonetheless the plane CAN take off.
#89
Originally Posted by 1 BAD S
ok, but the main point to this whole question, is that the treadmill keeps speed with the throttle. when the planes on the ground the wheel really isnt "free spinning". the weight of the plane in on them. put the plane on a treadmill and turn it on. the plane will go backwords. if you keep the throttle at 210 knots and the treadmill at 210 knots, the plane is at a standstill. what i really think, is you would have to reach a speed where the weight of the plane is no longer on the wheels, i.e. the force of the treadmill overcomes the weight of the weight of the plane. which brings me back to my point of the plane running out of gas, or it running out of runway space. either way this bird wont fly
#90
Originally Posted by 1 BAD S
lets say you get some skates on and get on a treadmill. and you just get on there and crank it up. the treadmill is going and you are just rolling there. then i apply a little force to you. you will move foward if i did this, but the trick to the question is that the treadmill is connected to the throttle. so once it sees im pushing you, it will add that exact force in the opposite direction. so you would be back to a stand still. now you have to see that