General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms

so.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-06-2008 | 11:46 PM
Leonide's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Avatar just for Jack
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,035
From: Whitehall, Ohio
Default so.....

i put my car in the shop to get the engine, fuel system looked at, and a rear end gear install. hopefully it is just an issue of replacing main bearings. that, and i am leaking fuel SOMEWHERE...no dripping...you just smell fuel as you get done driving it.
 
  #2  
Old 10-09-2008 | 11:30 AM
Leonide's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Avatar just for Jack
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,035
From: Whitehall, Ohio
Default

gears installed....my mustang goes faster. the guy couldn't find the fuel problem, and he has to pull the engine...so that gives me an excuse to buy new internals and redo the heads/intake/cam.


do i need to reflash my chip when i put in the 3:73 gears or no? (i put in the correct speedo gear)
 

Last edited by Leonide; 10-09-2008 at 11:39 AM.
  #3  
Old 10-09-2008 | 11:41 AM
Stephen4036's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,803
From: Orlando, FL
Default

buy a newer mustang
 
  #4  
Old 10-09-2008 | 12:10 PM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,974
From: Orlando,Florida
Default

Since you changed the speedo gear you do NOT need to reflash the ecu for the gear swap, just keep it listed as stock gears in the tune as the speedo gear has fixed it for your year car. Glad to see you like the gears alot, is yours auto or stick? Also why does the motor have to come out?
 
  #5  
Old 10-09-2008 | 05:25 PM
Leonide's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Avatar just for Jack
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,035
From: Whitehall, Ohio
Default

auto, and that is what my mechanic said...he tried pulling the oil pan off, and said he has to pull it to get it off. i need to talk with him more about it in the future, cause i gotta replace those bearings.



(and i aint buying a newer mustang. i am happy with the one i got.)
 
  #6  
Old 10-09-2008 | 05:51 PM
sand1303's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 965
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Stephen4036
buy a newer mustang

SN95 body style rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  #7  
Old 10-09-2008 | 05:58 PM
Stephen4036's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,803
From: Orlando, FL
Default

lol im sorry man, they really dont.
 
  #8  
Old 10-09-2008 | 06:12 PM
sand1303's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 965
From: Austin, TX
Default

yea they do, u could trade me and u would fall in love with them
 
  #9  
Old 10-09-2008 | 06:23 PM
bassman97's Avatar
blank
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,451
From: North Jersey
Default

Technically speaking, your car is SN95, platform wise, but it's "New Edge" in style.
 
  #10  
Old 10-09-2008 | 06:54 PM
INtZ's Avatar
Anal Bum Cover Inventor
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 786
From: Dorm in OH, Home in PA
Default

Originally Posted by bassman97
Technically speaking, your car is SN95, platform wise, but it's "New Edge" in style.
???? both sand and leonide have sn95's, they dont look new edge to me
 
  #11  
Old 10-09-2008 | 07:02 PM
Stephen4036's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,803
From: Orlando, FL
Default

they look nothing like INTz and I's car, they have same frame but who cares. none of the same body panels.
 
  #12  
Old 10-09-2008 | 07:15 PM
3.8for the win's Avatar
Evolution 9
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,887
Default

the frame name SN95 on all 94-04 mustang all 05+ mustangs are S197.

the body style is a little different the 99-04 cars had the new edge style body.

the frame makes the car........
 
  #13  
Old 10-09-2008 | 07:28 PM
sand1303's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 965
From: Austin, TX
Default

the 94-98 were a lot heavier than the 99-04? is that why some people call them snails or is it just the rounded shape? i prefer the stock body of the 94-98 over stock body of 99-04. although i have seen some very nice looking 99-04 body styles that have had add-ons and extra body parts(scoops and other stuff) that look hella beefy and i get excited.
 
  #14  
Old 10-09-2008 | 07:33 PM
3.8for the win's Avatar
Evolution 9
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,887
Default

no, its just they were lacking in power. in 99 the engine got a make over with PI uppers and lowers, i believe i might be wrong but i think that was one of the things.
 
  #15  
Old 10-10-2008 | 10:54 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,719
From: Livermore, Ca
Default

99 started the PI heads and cams. 94-98 can be pulled off very nicely if done right. I think stock for stock a 99-04 looks better. I'm assuming the 94-98 are roughly around the same weight as 99-04.
 
  #16  
Old 10-10-2008 | 02:26 PM
08mustang_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,201
From: Liberty, Missouri
Default

Stock 99-04 definitely look better. The 94-98 bodies are too smooth, curve wise. The sharp lines of the 99-04 look much better.
 
  #17  
Old 10-10-2008 | 03:11 PM
Stephen4036's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,803
From: Orlando, FL
Default

only flaw of 99-04 is how much the front bumper sticks out past headlights, it looks ok if your looking straight at it, but if not, its ugly
 
  #18  
Old 10-11-2008 | 01:26 AM
Leonide's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Avatar just for Jack
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,035
From: Whitehall, Ohio
Default

*watches as this thread gets off track real quick*
 
  #19  
Old 10-11-2008 | 04:25 AM
engineman312's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 615
From: new york city
Default

Originally Posted by spike_africa
why does the motor have to come out?
i was wondering the same thing. maybe talk to another mechanic...
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 PM.