Drag Racing! Discussions on drag racing, using the tree and techniques for improving your performance at the track

03 Lightning Vs Stang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-28-2005, 07:08 PM
buddyabe's Avatar
SILVER 01 GT CONVERT AUTO
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: coon rapids mn. u.s.a.
Posts: 205
Default 03 Lightning Vs Stang

I know we don't recommend or condone street racing but I thought I would post the results of a drag race I had with a co-worker this afternoon at 2 different stop lights we lined up at. I own a 01 GT convert with auto,Hypertech programmer,welded in flowmasters,Accufab plenum and 75mm throtle body and stock airbox with K and N and silencer removed and 3.73 gears. My co-worker owns a 03 stock lightning. The first light from a dead stop the lightning jumped me by a half car length and they stayed even up to 80mph. The second stop light was from a 20mph roll and I jumped him by 1/2 length and stayed ahead up to 80mph. Neither one of us had any traction issues. I don't know what the lightning runs at the track,my car ran 14.3-14.4 before I installed the throtle body and plenum and may run 14.2 now? P.S. we raced on a county highway and not on a city street.
 
  #3  
Old 03-28-2005, 07:34 PM
buddyabe's Avatar
SILVER 01 GT CONVERT AUTO
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: coon rapids mn. u.s.a.
Posts: 205
Default

When my 01 convert with auto was stock,a guy and his wife pulled alongside me with a new dodge 1500 extended cab 4x4 pickup on the highway.I was going 55mph and he stomped on it and I stomped on it after him and I couldn't pass him,we were even from 55-85 mph,I did have 4 people in my car though. The truck and I came to a stop light and raced from a dead stop and they were close again but I did start to eventually pull away. As far as chevy,they are putting a 390 horse 6.0 litre in the ssr pickup now.
 
  #4  
Old 03-28-2005, 08:15 PM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 11,974
Default

i am surprized you kept up the 01-04 lightning with there 380hp blown 5.4 will go as fast as 13.2 stock as a rock in good air with a nice lunach. I know i used ot want one badly, ok i still do.

Ps- why wouldnt you hual with it its a truck its made to hual *** and hual stuff.
 
  #6  
Old 03-28-2005, 10:25 PM
venom's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,075
Default

My wife in a stock 04 Durango Hemi and me on my stock 98 Gt from a 45mph rolling start it was real close I inched ahead of the Hemi slowly. For an SUV thats pretty good. I did buy an intake for the Hemi last week and will dyno it soon to see what it does.
 
  #7  
Old 03-28-2005, 10:47 PM
tedinde's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bear Delaware
Posts: 220
Default

Im surprised to that lightning didnt walk all over you. Its a shame SVT is dead now and no more lightnings!!! I had a 1988 lightning 12 years ago. 351 naturally aspirated i bought it from a buddy. he cammed it up and either it came stock with 4.10s or he put them in. I put some slicks on and 300lbs in the back in sandbags and pulled off a 12.76 best run. Dam thing averaged 9mpg though!!

Ive got a 2002 Ford F150 4x4 4.6 now. Ive done a few mods to it. 36" tires arent for drag, or the dam 6600lb with 4wd and all the options. I shoulda got the 5.4 motor. But i didnt buy it for a drag truck.

I bought the truck new. Man it was so hard not to buy a lightning. but i needed a truck that could do some work. I have a 320 foot paved driveway and i needed a plow for the winter and be able to get to work no matter how much snow. And putting in fence posts last year on my property, I know i easily had over 2000lbs in the back overloaded. No way in a lightning!!

Id love to have a new lightning, my dream truck back in the day. Was a GMC Syclone. Any of u guys remember those. My best friend Had one. Put your foot on the brake at a light and let that turbo spool up and let that brake go and there wasnt anything that could touch those trucks off the line. I havnt seen one on the road in 5 years. They all must be tucked away.
 
  #8  
Old 03-29-2005, 04:20 AM
04DarkShadowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,095
Default

Originally Posted by tedinde
Im surprised to that lightning didnt walk all over you. Its a shame SVT is dead now and no more lightnings!!! I had a 1988 lightning 12 years ago. 351 naturally aspirated i bought it from a buddy. he cammed it up and either it came stock with 4.10s or he put them in. I put some slicks on and 300lbs in the back in sandbags and pulled off a 12.76 best run. Dam thing averaged 9mpg though!!
Firts of all there is no 1988 Lightning. The Gen 1 Lightnings were made from 93-95. Check www.svtperformance.com if you dont believe me.

Second SVT is not dead. There is no more Lightning but there is an AWD 390hp blown Sport Trac and the Shelby Cobra GT 500 still in the SVT stable.

Anyway I am also suprised he didnt spank you. Especially since your an Auto Vert.
 
  #9  
Old 03-29-2005, 05:38 AM
buddyabe's Avatar
SILVER 01 GT CONVERT AUTO
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: coon rapids mn. u.s.a.
Posts: 205
Default

I was expecting to get spanked and perhaps if we both went to the strip and raced a full quarter mile he would turn in the better time slip. Based on the way his truck performed I would have to guess that he might run 13.9-14.00 at the track,but that is just a guess.
 
  #10  
Old 03-29-2005, 01:32 PM
venom's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,075
Default

Originally Posted by 04DarkShadowGT
Firts of all there is no 1988 Lightning. The Gen 1 Lightnings were made from 93-95. Check www.svtperformance.com if you dont believe me.

Second SVT is not dead. There is no more Lightning but there is an AWD 390hp blown Sport Trac and the Shelby Cobra GT 500 still in the SVT stable.

Anyway I am also suprised he didnt spank you. Especially since your an Auto Vert.
Im glad they are moving away from the two seater f150 and going to the four seater. I hope they fix the roll over problem the sport trac has.
 
  #11  
Old 03-29-2005, 04:34 PM
Blk02stang's Avatar
I 8urvtec!!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Va
Posts: 815
Default

I watched a friend of mine race a '01 lightning in his '94 GT 4.6 5 speed w/ jus headers and full exhaust and he walked 3 cars on it and it was a bone stock lightning. I guess it all depends on the driver of the cars...
 
  #12  
Old 03-29-2005, 04:48 PM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 11,974
Default

94's are 5.0s? maybe a different year car.
 
  #13  
Old 03-29-2005, 04:52 PM
Blk02stang's Avatar
I 8urvtec!!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Va
Posts: 815
Default

no his is a 4.6 my uncle has a '94 also and his has the 302 in it but his side badges say gt 4.6 and on my buddy's they say GT mustang so i dunno but it's a weird thing ford did i guess.
 
  #14  
Old 03-29-2005, 05:51 PM
04DarkShadowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,095
Default

Someone put in a different engine because Ford would not have mysteriously put a 4.6 in random 94 Mustangs.

Either that or its not a 94.
 
  #15  
Old 03-29-2005, 11:09 PM
Blk02stang's Avatar
I 8urvtec!!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Va
Posts: 815
Default

i know for sure it is the original engine from when his older brother baught the car new 140K miles on it too. Another boy around here in Va has the same thing, his rims are the split 3-spoke and says GT mustang on the fender badges too and it's a 4.6 engine.
 
  #16  
Old 03-30-2005, 05:42 AM
04DarkShadowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,095
Default

Well if that is in fact the case, which I still doubt, they have some of the rarest mustangs ever, because Ford didnt make a 4.6L mustang till 1996.
 
  #17  
Old 04-10-2005, 06:55 AM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 868
Default

I have raced Lightnings twice at the track and beat both of them. They both ran 13.5's with a bad 60' time. If they could have hooked my butt would have been cooked. I could hear them comming fast at the top end. Those trucks would kill me from a 40 mph roll on the street where they would have less traction issues.
 
  #18  
Old 04-10-2005, 09:32 AM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 11,974
Default

I love Lightnings its what i wanted instead of the stang, but i couldnt find one i liked.
 
  #19  
Old 04-10-2005, 10:07 AM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 868
Default

Originally Posted by spike_africa
I love Lightnings its what i wanted instead of the stang, but i couldnt find one i liked.
You and me both Spike, I love those things. But I like being alive much more. If I bring home another toy my wife would slit my throat in my sleep. :Whaxatk:
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Grey03GTStang
Pictures
12
06-25-2010 03:40 AM
TWIN TURBO
Drag Racing!
3
06-04-2009 07:26 PM
TClark22
Videos
4
10-20-2006 03:53 PM
87ericgt
General Tech Forum
15
06-28-2005 11:19 AM
02wt5sp
The Lounge
3
05-06-2005 12:26 AM



Quick Reply: 03 Lightning Vs Stang



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 PM.