question again - Mustang Boards


5.0L Tech There's no replacement for displacement.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:40 PM
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 831
Default question again

im lyin here in bed really thinkin hard about gettin a fox body. insurrance wise i want a 88 so i can make it a classic/antique car and get a huge reduction on my insurrance. however......can some1 tell me what they changed inbetween the years of 88-93 please? and in your opinion which is ur fav fox year?why?

for the record its not that i dont like carbs(but yea fuel injection is better) .....i just dont like the square head lights on the fox years previous to the 88. i duno why.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2008, 01:53 PM
Ketchum & Killem
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,065
Default

the 89-92 Mustang 5.0's had forged bottom ends.'

im not sure on the 87,88, i dont think they did, there is a lot of info out there saying it was 87092 and 89-92, be on the safe side and get an 89.

the 93's went with some hyperthertic pistons or some **** like that that dont handle as well, so fo fror an 89-92 and you cant go wrong

if you go with a 89-92 and maybe the quick kit 1 & 2 from andersonfort motorsports, all you gotta do is a little suspension and some 4:10's and you can probably hang with stock 03/04 terminators. The quickkit 1 and 2 packages combined bring about 330 dyno proven hp, and it will run you about 4,000


as for the 4 eye mustangs you dont like, a lot of people will swap the panels with a 87-93 and get the better looking front.

from what i understand those cars are almost like legos with how much you can do with them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:34 AM
ClemsonStang's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 378
Default

front end change happened in 87. 87/88 cars were speed density not mass air, so you would have to do the conversion if you wanted to upgrade engine parts. there were other minor changes that came about in 90. the front fenders and extensions changed, the rear quarter panel plastic changed in the hatches. airbag cars have different clusters, columns, and plastic surrounds.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2008, 12:47 PM
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 831
Default

thanks a lot guys... ive been very attracted to the 89 and 90 years. i might do the 89 because i already had a 90....just tryin to change things up

thanks again!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: crofton MD
Posts: 68
Default

88 supposedly had more horses then 89-92. supposedly 88 had 230-235 horses. but the 88's internals arent as strong as mentioned. ur best bet is to go 89-92 like someone has already said also
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP!!!...again G-P 5.0L Tech 2 05-24-2008 03:52 PM
riced again Why why why pneon99 Pictures 13 05-08-2005 07:35 AM
Back in the saddle again... Triangulum New Members! 5 04-18-2005 06:24 AM
October Trivia strikes again ChrisXoxide Modular 4.6L Tech 11 10-26-2004 07:35 PM


Tags
88, bottom, end, forged, mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:08 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.