money to spend

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

#31

11-21-2008, 10:25 AM

stangcharger

500hp v6

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Edmond, OK

Posts: 344

Quote:

Originally Posted by ca96redstang

says the guy with the V-6

who's v6 is darn near as fast as your GT stock for stock.

uneducated is the way of the land. youll call our cars slow and then say a supra or GN is fast. yet are motors make way more than theres boost for boost.

and i will say the same to you as he did. and yes i have a v6.

#32

11-21-2008, 10:45 AM

Redrum

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Humble,Tx

Posts: 524

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Sunshine

ca96redstang

o ok in that case its fine.

#33

11-21-2008, 11:13 AM

Redrum

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Humble,Tx

Posts: 524

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.8LMustang

just get 4.10 gears/tlok/bearing rebuild kit(if u need it)/gear oil/ friction modifier

and then if u have enough left go to a muffler shop and tell them you want dual exhaust with flowmaster and a h-pipe...

end of story

but if he does the gears he still need a tuner

#34

11-21-2008, 11:16 AM

3.8LMustang

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2008

Location: Corpus Christi, Texas

Posts: 2,107

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrum

but if he does the gears he still need a tuner

well ****....

then get the tuner

ur v6 stang will be a sleeper

im pretty sure thats in his price range

Ohhh and off topic.... Wat does a stock 2002 GT get in a 1/4?

#35

11-21-2008, 11:28 AM

stangcharger

500hp v6

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Edmond, OK

Posts: 344

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.8LMustang

well ****....

then get the tuner

ur v6 stang will be a sleeper

im pretty sure thats in his price range

Ohhh and off topic.... Wat does a stock 2002 GT get in a 1/4?

off topic.

low 14's for most. damn good drivers are in the high 13's.

#36

11-21-2008, 11:43 AM

3.8LMustang

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2008

Location: Corpus Christi, Texas

Posts: 2,107

Quote:

Originally Posted by stangcharger

off topic.

low 14's for most. damn good drivers are in the high 13's.

off topic...

how much RWHP are we looking at for stock 02 GT for them to get in the low 14's?

#37

11-21-2008, 12:10 PM

Redrum

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Humble,Tx

Posts: 524

off topic ...

270 rwhp

#38

11-21-2008, 12:51 PM

stangcharger

500hp v6

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Edmond, OK

Posts: 344

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrum

off topic ...

270 rwhp

what? they have 260 crank stock and run that.

220-230rwhp is where they range at.

#39

11-21-2008, 01:10 PM

3.8LMustang

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2008

Location: Corpus Christi, Texas

Posts: 2,107

Quote:

Originally Posted by stangcharger

what? they have 260 crank stock and run that.

220-230rwhp is where they range at.

off topic...

so 220-230rwhp will give me in the low 14's then.... **** i think that's should be easy

and do you think my trans should hold that kind of power? my trans was rebuild like 5 years ago.

Last edited by 3.8LMustang; 11-21-2008 at 01:13 PM.

#40

11-21-2008, 01:54 PM

Lazerred6

Pocket Rocket

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Grand Rapids MI

Posts: 3,791

Off topic

#41

11-21-2008, 01:56 PM

3.8LMustang

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2008

Location: Corpus Christi, Texas

Posts: 2,107

^^^^LMAO!!!! Name: smile048.gif
Views: 9
Size: 4.4 KB

#42

11-21-2008, 02:44 PM

stangcharger

500hp v6

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Edmond, OK

Posts: 344

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.8LMustang

off topic...

so 220-230rwhp will give me in the low 14's then.... **** i think that's should be easy

and do you think my trans should hold that kind of power? my trans was rebuild like 5 years ago.

should easily hold that power. and you can possibly run it with less.

with 195rwhp i went 14.7 w/ 2.1 60ft. get that 60ft lower and i was in the low 14's.

#43

11-21-2008, 02:53 PM

3.8LMustang

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2008

Location: Corpus Christi, Texas

Posts: 2,107

Quote:

Originally Posted by stangcharger

should easily hold that power. and you can possibly run it with less.

with 195rwhp i went 14.7 w/ 2.1 60ft. get that 60ft lower and i was in the low 14's.

damn thats badass.

i think the next time when i go to the track ill be sum were about 15's (without the 8.8 rear/ pill) , but by next year i should have 8.8 rear with anykind of gears it comes with but for sure they are gonna be more than 3.27 gears. and then once after that comes the pill

gonna spray 30-75 shot, dont know which one yet, and with that i should be around low 14's or even high 13's

#44

11-21-2008, 04:12 PM

spike_africa

Administrator

Join Date: Sep 2004

Location: Orlando,Florida

Posts: 11,974

I would not waste my time with anything less then a 75shot.

#45

11-21-2008, 07:39 PM

dOcV6

2002 Mustang V6

Thread Starter

Join Date: Feb 2008

Location: E.B. MASS.

Posts: 141

wow i figured this would be dead. yeah i saved the money up for a while. long time. some from my tax money from feb this year. i still dont know what i want to do. winter is here so rims right now would be pointless. i wouldnt want to look at them in my room all winter long. i'm just going to save it for now. never know whats going to wrong nowadays. i still have to fix my idle problem. i checked the iac and it seems fine. im gunna just take it to the shop on wendsday. its loud when i start it up at 530 in the morning leaving for work. i dont want pissy people next door to me. thanks to the people who tried to help me decide in this. annd to the off topic people who hiijacked this thread.... your just funny as hell. i got a good laugh. good night everyone.