V6 Tech Forums For all your 3.8L and 4.0L needs!

getting more power up top

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-10-2008, 06:33 PM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default getting more power up top

alright so i have a 2002 v6 mustang with the following mods:
4.10 gears,posi-trac differential, dual exhaust, shorty headers, tuner, and drop in filter.

i will have a precision industries stallion torque converter installed for when i go to the track.

the first three gears are no problem and my car flies through them with the mods i have now. once i install the torque converter, it will lock up all the way to the fourth gear. im hoping for mycar to be able to run in the 14's but to do so, i will have to be around 80mph. my car seems to lose power at around 60mph and im afraid that it will fall flat on its face once it hits fourth gear. is there anything that i can do to make more power in this range? ive heard that if i do 1.8 ratio roller rockers, i can reach higher rpm's safely. is this true? and if so could i extend my shift points using the tuner so that the first three gears last longer?
 
  #2  
Old 03-10-2008, 07:09 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

You will need to run more like 95 mph to get into the 14's. Trap speed is a function of hp plain and simple. The higher rpms I don't think will help you that much not on a car like this. You will need to add a power adder or drop the weight of the car by about 500 - 600 lbs. Why don't you add a 75 shot of the sauce and call it a day?
 
  #3  
Old 03-10-2008, 07:32 PM
mustangvsix's Avatar
4 point 6
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Flagstaff, Az / Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 3,347
Default

yeah, you can either build the motor, drop weight, or add a power adder. I was 85mph and only ran a 16.5 with a CAI, stock auto, Mac Catback, and my heavy fat *** tires.
 
  #4  
Old 03-10-2008, 07:55 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

His 80 mph comments has got to be a typo. There is no car in the world that breaks into the 14's and traps in the 80's. Also, I would never crack open that engine to do something like swap the rockers. Maybe if the car made 800 hp.

Again, slap on some sauce or a blower and call it a day.
 
  #5  
Old 03-10-2008, 09:05 PM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by WaterDR
His 80 miles per hour comments has got to be a typo. There is no car in the world that breaks into the 14's and traps in the 80's. Also, I would never crack open that engine to do something like swap the rockers. Maybe if the car made 800 hp.

Again, slap on some sauce or a blower and call it a day.
sorry about the mph mistake. but whats wrong with roller rockers? they bolt right on and with the 1.8 ratio, should add around 10hp.
 
  #6  
Old 03-10-2008, 09:35 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Just seems too extreme. The motor is not designed to spin much faster and I have never heard of anyone making this mod on a sixer or a GT. Hey, you could be the first. But the work+cost vs results ratio just is not good enough.

Maybe someone else...or you will prove me wrong.
 
  #7  
Old 03-10-2008, 09:46 PM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by WaterDR
Just seems too extreme. The motor is not designed to spin much faster and I have never heard of anyone making this mod on a sixer or a GT. Hey, you could be the first. But the work+cost vs results ratio just is not good enough.

Maybe someone else...or you will prove me wrong.
um youve never heard of ANYONE using these? and its not extreme at all. just unbolt the upper intake manifold and valve covers and bolt them down.
 
  #8  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:26 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Anytime you have to open the motor to gain 10 hp, that is too extreme for me. Not to mention spinning the motor faster then it should go w/o making any other modifications to the engine.

If you can find one guy here that has done this, and has dyno data, I will owe you a Starbucks. Gift card will be sent the next day.
 
  #9  
Old 03-11-2008, 07:30 AM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

to be honest youll prolly be in the mid 15's as you car sits now. maybe low 15's on a good run.

1.8RR's would be ok i have them in mine. 1.73's are ideal if you plan on a cam later.

looking into a J-mod would be benificial.

and BTW god help you if your running on 17in rims. if that is the case id say your in the 16's.

take it out to the track and see what it does. track time is the best way to lower et's. youd be suprised how much faster you accelerate at the track when launch as opposed to the street.
 
  #10  
Old 03-11-2008, 08:05 AM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by stangcharger
to be honest youll prolly be in the mid 15's as you car sits now. maybe low 15's on a good run.

1.8RR's would be ok i have them in mine. 1.73's are ideal if you plan on a cam later.

looking into a J-mod would be benificial.

and BTW god help you if your running on 17in rims. if that is the case id say your in the 16's.

take it out to the track and see what it does. track time is the best way to lower et's. youd be suprised how much faster you accelerate at the track when launch as opposed to the street.
i have 18*9 chrome saleens on my car and i cant see how im in the 16's now. i thought these cars run that stock? and my car is a hell of a lot faster with the gears and tune now than before and that is with the rims on.
 
  #11  
Old 03-11-2008, 08:59 AM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

Originally Posted by tigerfan2771
i have 18*9 chrome saleens on my car and i cant see how im in the 16's now. i thought these cars run that stock? and my car is a hell of a lot faster with the gears and tune now than before and that is with the rims on.
because for ever 10lbs added to rotating mass(i.e. your rims) you lose .1 sec in the 1/4. so by going up to 18's you prolly gained and easy 50lbs. that is half a sec slower in the 1/4 with your rims/tires alone. so basically your mods put you back to where you were stock. just to make up for the weight gained from the rims/tires.

really though with that big of rim and tires id say your more like 80lbs heavier. so good estimate would be .8 slower than if you had your stock 15's on.
 

Last edited by stangcharger; 03-11-2008 at 09:03 AM.
  #12  
Old 03-11-2008, 09:08 AM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by stangcharger
because for ever 10lbs added to rotating mass(i.e. your rims) you lose .1 sec in the 1/4. so by going up to 18's you prolly gained and easy 50lbs. that is half a sec slower in the 1/4 with your rims/tires alone. so basically your mods put you back to where you were stock. just to make up for the weight gained from the rims/tires.

really though with that big of rim and tires id say your more like 80lbs heavier. so good estimate would be .8 slower than if you had your stock 15's on.
so how is it that when i raced a couple stock 99-04 v6's, i beat the hell out of them? how is it that i almost keep up with my friend's chevy ss intimidator and a 99-04 stock gt?
 
  #13  
Old 03-11-2008, 10:08 AM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

Originally Posted by tigerfan2771
so how is it that when i raced a couple stock 99-04 v6's, i beat the hell out of them? how is it that i almost keep up with my friend's chevy ss intimidator and a 99-04 stock gt?
bad drivers.

you couldnt keep up with a stock 99-04 gt anyway. they run low 14's and even if you hit low 15's a full sec difference is quite a bit.

listen facts are facts street races dont matter one bit. the track is completely different.

and were those races from a dig? cause that's what the track will be. and with no torque spinning those huge tires is going to be a chore.

there a reason why i put 15's on the front of my car when i go to the track. and would put 15's on the back as well if they could hold the tire i need.

this ratating mass theory has been tested to death and has the same result everytime. example a dead stock 03 cobra put v6 rims(15in) and did 12.6 in the 1/4. i dont know of any one with stock 17's doing that..it was because of the less rotating mass.
 

Last edited by stangcharger; 03-11-2008 at 10:12 AM.
  #14  
Old 03-11-2008, 10:26 AM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

One second is a lot....then again ist is not that much either. Some guys run mid 14's and some can get into the 13's on a stock GT. But a car running mid 15's will not keep up with a low 14 second car. It is pretty much night and day. You can always find a "range" where the cars might look similar, but that is about it.

2 seconds or even one second is a lot at 90+ miles per hour. One second is something like 125 feet. That is not a close race in anyone's book.
 
  #15  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:30 PM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

alright but there is NO possible way that my car is as slow as it was all stock. between the tune and the gears, my car is a whole lot faster now. and once i get the torque converter, upper intake, intake spacer, pullies, lca's, j-mod, and throttle body, i should see about the same improvements as i did with the gears and tuner.

tell me if im factoring these in right:
lets say the rims add about .5-.8sec.

a stock 02 v6 runs about a 16.0. with the rims thats up toabout a 16.5-16.8.

the gears/posi-trac takes off about .5seconds
the tuner takes off about .2-.3seconds
the torque converter takes off around .4-.5seconds
the pullies ive heard around .2seconds
the j-mod is around .1second
between the headers,cat-back, intake, intake spacer, and throttle body around .2-.3seconds

with the addition of the lca's and maybe some other suspension mods, i should be able to get off the line much quicker as well. as it is right now, my car can get moving pretty quick up to 60mph and should only improve.
with the above mentioned mods, i see no reason why i cant hit a mid-high 14sec quarter mile. im not saying that this is impressive or anything, but it is my goal.
 
  #16  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:58 PM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

Originally Posted by tigerfan2771
alright but there is NO possible way that my car is as slow as it was all stock. between the tune and the gears, my car is a whole lot faster now. and once i get the torque converter, upper intake, intake spacer, pullies, lca's, j-mod, and throttle body, i should see about the same improvements as i did with the gears and tuner.

tell me if im factoring these in right:
lets say the rims add about .5-.8sec.

a stock 02 v6 runs about a 16.0. with the rims thats up toabout a 16.5-16.8.

the gears/posi-trac takes off about .5seconds
the tuner takes off about .2-.3seconds
the torque converter takes off around .4-.5seconds
the pullies ive heard around .2seconds
the j-mod is around .1second
between the headers,cat-back, intake, intake spacer, and throttle body around .2-.3seconds

with the addition of the lca's and maybe some other suspension mods, i should be able to get off the line much quicker as well. as it is right now, my car can get moving pretty quick up to 60mph and should only improve.
with the above mentioned mods, i see no reason why i cant hit a mid-high 14sec quarter mile. im not saying that this is impressive or anything, but it is my goal.
dont add figures they will never add up. see what rwhp you are at and the weight of your car. and that will give you the best ET guess.
 
  #17  
Old 03-11-2008, 03:25 PM
SSSTANG's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 62
Default

Originally Posted by tigerfan2771
alright but there is NO possible way that my car is as slow as it was all stock. between the tune and the gears, my car is a whole lot faster now. and once i get the torque converter, upper intake, intake spacer, pullies, lca's, j-mod, and throttle body, i should see about the same improvements as i did with the gears and tuner.

tell me if im factoring these in right:
lets say the rims add about .5-.8sec.

a stock 02 v6 runs about a 16.0. with the rims thats up toabout a 16.5-16.8.

the gears/posi-trac takes off about .5seconds
the tuner takes off about .2-.3seconds
the torque converter takes off around .4-.5seconds
the pullies ive heard around .2seconds
the j-mod is around .1second
between the headers,cat-back, intake, intake spacer, and throttle body around .2-.3seconds

with the addition of the lca's and maybe some other suspension mods, i should be able to get off the line much quicker as well. as it is right now, my car can get moving pretty quick up to 60mph and should only improve.
with the above mentioned mods, i see no reason why i cant hit a mid-high 14sec quarter mile. im not saying that this is impressive or anything, but it is my goal.

RICER MATH!!!!!!!!
 
  #18  
Old 03-11-2008, 05:09 PM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by SSSTANG
RICER MATH!!!!!!!!
how is this ricer math? im not adding up 60hp from the mods im making. just because i have a certain hp and weight doesnt mean im gonna run a certain time. how do you factor in things such as gears and a torque converter? and suspension mods like lower control arms?
 
  #19  
Old 03-11-2008, 07:51 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

Calling it "ricer math" is a bit mean, but I understand what he means. The ricer guys are always claiming rediculous numbers from the mods they do....I don't think you are being that excessive. But, the numbers really don't up the way you suggest.

It is great to have a goal.

If you want to know what you need to do to your car to get it into the 14's, then find a 6'er that runs that low and see what they did. I don't think you will find a single car w/o nitrous or a blower or at least ported heads with cams.

To get into the mid 14's, you need to be able to pull a 60 foot of under 2.0 seconds and will most likely need to trap near 100 miles per hour. That is a huge gain and is a straight function of either hp or weight. You don't have enough of the first, and have to much of the later. Suspension mods only will take you so far. This is why your car feels like it falls on it's face at 60 miles per hour......not enough hp. You need to make 50 to 75 more hp.

Your car feels faster for two reasons: 1 - It probably is. 2 - You wallet is now thinner so the butt-o-meter is more sensitive. This happens to everyone....not a bust on you.

There are some nice 1/4 mile calculators out there. Find a good one and start playing with the numbers (weight, gears, and hp) and it will show you pretty much what you need.

Have you raced it? Latop racing sucks. Get it to a track....make one mod at a time and practise. If you have never raced, I guarentee you suck...we all do at first. Everyone gets better as they go and running at a track is an entirely different experience then on a street.
 
  #20  
Old 03-11-2008, 09:07 PM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by WaterDR
Calling it "ricer math" is a bit mean, but I understand what he means. The ricer guys are always claiming rediculous numbers from the mods they do....I don't think you are being that excessive. But, the numbers really don't up the way you suggest.

It is great to have a goal.

If you want to know what you need to do to your car to get it into the 14's, then find a 6'er that runs that low and see what they did. I don't think you will find a single car w/o nitrous or a blower or at least ported heads with cams.

To get into the mid 14's, you need to be able to pull a 60 foot of under 2.0 seconds and will most likely need to trap near 100 miles per hour. That is a huge gain and is a straight function of either hp or weight. You don't have enough of the first, and have to much of the later. Suspension mods only will take you so far. This is why your car feels like it falls on it's face at 60 miles per hour......not enough hp. You need to make 50 to 75 more hp.

Your car feels faster for two reasons: 1 - It probably is. 2 - You wallet is now thinner so the butt-o-meter is more sensitive. This happens to everyone....not a bust on you.

There are some nice 1/4 mile calculators out there. Find a good one and start playing with the numbers (weight, gears, and hp) and it will show you pretty much what you need.

Have you raced it? Latop racing sucks. Get it to a track....make one mod at a time and practise. If you have never raced, I guarentee you suck...we all do at first. Everyone gets better as they go and running at a track is an entirely different experience then on a street.
im not sure if youre a member of moddedmustangs.com but atlanticblue runs a 15.05-.08 with just bolt-ons and on 17/9&17/10.5 rims. all he has are 4.10 gears, posi-trac differential, mac long tubes,o/r h-pipe,magnaflow magnapack,cai,tuner,lowering springs,removed front away bar.

true i do have 18 inch rims, but i will have a torque converter, j-mod, lca's, ported upper, intake spacer, and tb in addition to most of his mods.
 
  #21  
Old 03-11-2008, 11:19 PM
SSSTANG's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 62
Default

Originally Posted by tigerfan2771
so how is it that when i raced a couple stock 99-04 v6's, i beat the hell out of them? how is it that i almost keep up with my friend's chevy ss intimidator and a 99-04 stock gt?

What do you consider almost?
And is said 99-04 gt the vert/auto version?

Anyway what kind of exhaust are you running?
AB ran a 14.9 with 4.10s, I could see you maybe running a 14.7 on some decent tires.
 

Last edited by SSSTANG; 03-11-2008 at 11:23 PM.
  #22  
Old 03-12-2008, 08:07 AM
White04GT's Avatar
KenneBell Blown
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kingwood, Tx.
Posts: 1,287
Default

I dont care what people say stock for stock a V6 can't keep up with a GT. That's like a GT owner saying he can keep up with a 03-04 cobra. This kid in high school had a v6 mustang with cai, Ud pulley's, and catback and his car was a standard and thought he could beat my GT because I was a stock auto. Ya I put a good bus length on his ***.
 
  #23  
Old 03-12-2008, 08:53 AM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by SSSTANG
What do you consider almost?
And is said 99-04 gt the vert/auto version?

Anyway what kind of exhaust are you running?
AB ran a 14.9 with 4.10s, I could see you maybe running a 14.7 on some decent tires.
the gt was my friend's. it was an 03 with 18 inch bullits, an auto, and a coupe. it also had around 80000 miles on it though.

i like the tires that i have. they arent as good as drag radials but they give me great traction on the street. they are toyo proxes 4. im not sure of the exact specs though. i just dont see why i couldnt beat his time with a little experience. especially with the extra mods that i have planned.
 
  #24  
Old 03-12-2008, 08:55 AM
tigerfan2771's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by White04GT
I dont care what people say stock for stock a V6 can't keep up with a GT. That's like a GT owner saying he can keep up with a 03-04 cobra. This kid in high school had a v6 mustang with cai, Ud pulley's, and catback and his car was a standard and thought he could beat my GT because I was a stock auto. Ya I put a good bus length on his ***.
well no **** i couldnt keep up with a gt with my v6 being stock. i had 4.10 gears, shorty headers, dual exhaust, differential, and an awesome tune. and i said that it was pretty close
 
  #25  
Old 03-12-2008, 08:56 AM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

Originally Posted by White04GT
I dont care what people say stock for stock a V6 can't keep up with a GT. That's like a GT owner saying he can keep up with a 03-04 cobra. This kid in high school had a v6 mustang with cai, Ud pulley's, and catback and his car was a standard and thought he could beat my GT because I was a stock auto. Ya I put a good bus length on his ***.
not totally true.

the 05 v6 mustang was actually de-tuned when it was built because it was keeping up with the previous model GT. They knew the GT owners would be pissed so they made it slower. so now they run high 14's stock.

and that kid you raced wasnt a good driver. auto GT's are around a 14.5 range dead stock and his car should have been nipping at the 15.0 zone with his mods. driver means everything.

I was beating 99-04 gt's when i had 195rwhp. just because they werent good drivers.
 
  #26  
Old 03-12-2008, 09:03 AM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

i guess bottom line is take it to the track as is and then get the time slips and we can help you from there.

the second half of the 1/8 mile will tell alot about your high end power.

and GL i hope you do hit low 15's or even 14's. i was just trying to give the knowledge that i am familiar with.
 
  #27  
Old 03-12-2008, 10:11 AM
White04GT's Avatar
KenneBell Blown
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kingwood, Tx.
Posts: 1,287
Default

This wasn't a 05+ v6 it was a 04 v6. I know the 05+ have a little get up and go I had one as a rental car. It wasn't near as fast as my 04GT was when it was stock but it was impressive for a 6. I don't know how you were beating a car that dyno's around 40rwhp higher and that is lighter then you maybe they were people with manuals that were bounceing off the limiter. My car dynoed 230rwhp stock with just the catback through an auto. With full bolt on's it dynoed at 260rwhp and 298rwtq through an auto. I should be well over the 410rwhp this summer once I get my new built auto tranny and pi torque converter and thats with only 8#'s of boost.
 

Last edited by White04GT; 03-12-2008 at 10:14 AM.
  #28  
Old 03-12-2008, 12:56 PM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

Originally Posted by White04GT
This wasn't a 05+ v6 it was a 04 v6. I know the 05+ have a little get up and go I had one as a rental car. It wasn't near as fast as my 04GT was when it was stock but it was impressive for a 6. I don't know how you were beating a car that dyno's around 40rwhp higher and that is lighter then you maybe they were people with manuals that were bounceing off the limiter. My car dynoed 230rwhp stock with just the catback through an auto. With full bolt on's it dynoed at 260rwhp and 298rwtq through an auto. I should be well over the 410rwhp this summer once I get my new built auto tranny and pi torque converter and thats with only 8#'s of boost.
40rwhp higher? those Gt's get 220-230rwhp stock. so that means yours was about 223rwhp or so when it was completely stock. catback atually helps alot on those gt's. i was at 195rwhp at the time. thats only around 25rwhp difference and v6's weight around 200-250lbs less than a GT.

And the weighing less is funny. my car right now weighs 3150lbs last time i ahd it on the scales. No GT could touch that unless stuff was taken off.

I agree though for 8#'s of boost that is nice to make those numbers. but power is power and these v6's blocks have already taken 30psi and withstood it for a long time. I will get a turbo when i can. with 15psi these v6's make anywhere from 520rwhp-560rwhp. both have been made with only 15psi. I plan to run 20psi or more and hopefully hit over 600rwhp.
 
  #29  
Old 03-12-2008, 01:11 PM
White04GT's Avatar
KenneBell Blown
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kingwood, Tx.
Posts: 1,287
Default

Yeah with a forged bottom end any motor can withstand alot of boost.

edit: Ya my numbers are nice I have one of the best tuner's in Tx. Pat @ PSI motorsports is awesome.
 
  #30  
Old 03-12-2008, 03:01 PM
stangcharger's Avatar
500hp v6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 344
Default

Originally Posted by White04GT
Yeah with a forged bottom end any motor can withstand alot of boost.

edit: Ya my numbers are nice I have one of the best tuner's in Tx. Pat @ PSI motorsports is awesome.
havent seen them much, link to website.

my tuner is in texas as well. HPP motorsports in lewisville. It is worth the travel from oklahoma city. but it is a decent drive.

hopefully i will be back in texas soon for another tune once i get my sheet metal intake bought and installed.
 


Quick Reply: getting more power up top



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 AM.